Cargando…
Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation
‘Green exercise’ (being physically active within a natural environment) research has examined the influence of environmental setting on health and wellbeing-related exercise outcomes. However, it is not known whether social exercise settings influence green exercise-associated changes in mood, self-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020624 |
_version_ | 1783496405870968832 |
---|---|
author | Rogerson, Mike Colbeck, Ian Bragg, Rachel Dosumu, Adekunle Griffin, Murray |
author_facet | Rogerson, Mike Colbeck, Ian Bragg, Rachel Dosumu, Adekunle Griffin, Murray |
author_sort | Rogerson, Mike |
collection | PubMed |
description | ‘Green exercise’ (being physically active within a natural environment) research has examined the influence of environmental setting on health and wellbeing-related exercise outcomes. However, it is not known whether social exercise settings influence green exercise-associated changes in mood, self-esteem, and connection to nature. This study directly compared outcomes of participating in green exercise alone compared to in a group. Using repeated measures, counterbalanced and randomized-crossover design, participants (n = 40) completed two 3 km runs around sports fields. These fields had a relatively flat grass terrain, predominant view of trees, and open grassland. On one occasion participants ran alone and on the other they ran in a group of 4–5 participants. Questionnaire measures of mood, self-esteem, and connection to nature were completed immediately pre- and post-run. Across all of the measures, two-way mixed ANOVAs found that there were statistically significant effects for time but not for time-by-condition interactions. The simplest interpretation of this finding is that social setting does not influence individuals’ attainment of the psychological outcomes of green exercise participation. However, we discuss the possibility that more complex processes might underpin this finding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7013434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70134342020-03-09 Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation Rogerson, Mike Colbeck, Ian Bragg, Rachel Dosumu, Adekunle Griffin, Murray Int J Environ Res Public Health Article ‘Green exercise’ (being physically active within a natural environment) research has examined the influence of environmental setting on health and wellbeing-related exercise outcomes. However, it is not known whether social exercise settings influence green exercise-associated changes in mood, self-esteem, and connection to nature. This study directly compared outcomes of participating in green exercise alone compared to in a group. Using repeated measures, counterbalanced and randomized-crossover design, participants (n = 40) completed two 3 km runs around sports fields. These fields had a relatively flat grass terrain, predominant view of trees, and open grassland. On one occasion participants ran alone and on the other they ran in a group of 4–5 participants. Questionnaire measures of mood, self-esteem, and connection to nature were completed immediately pre- and post-run. Across all of the measures, two-way mixed ANOVAs found that there were statistically significant effects for time but not for time-by-condition interactions. The simplest interpretation of this finding is that social setting does not influence individuals’ attainment of the psychological outcomes of green exercise participation. However, we discuss the possibility that more complex processes might underpin this finding. MDPI 2020-01-18 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7013434/ /pubmed/31963700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020624 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rogerson, Mike Colbeck, Ian Bragg, Rachel Dosumu, Adekunle Griffin, Murray Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation |
title | Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation |
title_full | Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation |
title_fullStr | Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation |
title_full_unstemmed | Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation |
title_short | Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation |
title_sort | affective outcomes of group versus lone green exercise participation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rogersonmike affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation AT colbeckian affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation AT braggrachel affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation AT dosumuadekunle affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation AT griffinmurray affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation |