Cargando…

Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation

‘Green exercise’ (being physically active within a natural environment) research has examined the influence of environmental setting on health and wellbeing-related exercise outcomes. However, it is not known whether social exercise settings influence green exercise-associated changes in mood, self-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogerson, Mike, Colbeck, Ian, Bragg, Rachel, Dosumu, Adekunle, Griffin, Murray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020624
_version_ 1783496405870968832
author Rogerson, Mike
Colbeck, Ian
Bragg, Rachel
Dosumu, Adekunle
Griffin, Murray
author_facet Rogerson, Mike
Colbeck, Ian
Bragg, Rachel
Dosumu, Adekunle
Griffin, Murray
author_sort Rogerson, Mike
collection PubMed
description ‘Green exercise’ (being physically active within a natural environment) research has examined the influence of environmental setting on health and wellbeing-related exercise outcomes. However, it is not known whether social exercise settings influence green exercise-associated changes in mood, self-esteem, and connection to nature. This study directly compared outcomes of participating in green exercise alone compared to in a group. Using repeated measures, counterbalanced and randomized-crossover design, participants (n = 40) completed two 3 km runs around sports fields. These fields had a relatively flat grass terrain, predominant view of trees, and open grassland. On one occasion participants ran alone and on the other they ran in a group of 4–5 participants. Questionnaire measures of mood, self-esteem, and connection to nature were completed immediately pre- and post-run. Across all of the measures, two-way mixed ANOVAs found that there were statistically significant effects for time but not for time-by-condition interactions. The simplest interpretation of this finding is that social setting does not influence individuals’ attainment of the psychological outcomes of green exercise participation. However, we discuss the possibility that more complex processes might underpin this finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7013434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70134342020-03-09 Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation Rogerson, Mike Colbeck, Ian Bragg, Rachel Dosumu, Adekunle Griffin, Murray Int J Environ Res Public Health Article ‘Green exercise’ (being physically active within a natural environment) research has examined the influence of environmental setting on health and wellbeing-related exercise outcomes. However, it is not known whether social exercise settings influence green exercise-associated changes in mood, self-esteem, and connection to nature. This study directly compared outcomes of participating in green exercise alone compared to in a group. Using repeated measures, counterbalanced and randomized-crossover design, participants (n = 40) completed two 3 km runs around sports fields. These fields had a relatively flat grass terrain, predominant view of trees, and open grassland. On one occasion participants ran alone and on the other they ran in a group of 4–5 participants. Questionnaire measures of mood, self-esteem, and connection to nature were completed immediately pre- and post-run. Across all of the measures, two-way mixed ANOVAs found that there were statistically significant effects for time but not for time-by-condition interactions. The simplest interpretation of this finding is that social setting does not influence individuals’ attainment of the psychological outcomes of green exercise participation. However, we discuss the possibility that more complex processes might underpin this finding. MDPI 2020-01-18 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7013434/ /pubmed/31963700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020624 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rogerson, Mike
Colbeck, Ian
Bragg, Rachel
Dosumu, Adekunle
Griffin, Murray
Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation
title Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation
title_full Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation
title_fullStr Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation
title_full_unstemmed Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation
title_short Affective Outcomes of Group versus Lone Green Exercise Participation
title_sort affective outcomes of group versus lone green exercise participation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020624
work_keys_str_mv AT rogersonmike affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation
AT colbeckian affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation
AT braggrachel affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation
AT dosumuadekunle affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation
AT griffinmurray affectiveoutcomesofgroupversuslonegreenexerciseparticipation