Cargando…

Beyond Lithium-Based Batteries

We discuss the latest developments in alternative battery systems based on sodium, magnesium, zinc and aluminum. In each case, we categorize the individual metals by the overarching cathode material type, focusing on the energy storage mechanism. Specifically, sodium-ion batteries are the closest in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biemolt, Jasper, Jungbacker, Peter, van Teijlingen, Tess, Yan, Ning, Rothenberg, Gadi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020425
_version_ 1783496456711176192
author Biemolt, Jasper
Jungbacker, Peter
van Teijlingen, Tess
Yan, Ning
Rothenberg, Gadi
author_facet Biemolt, Jasper
Jungbacker, Peter
van Teijlingen, Tess
Yan, Ning
Rothenberg, Gadi
author_sort Biemolt, Jasper
collection PubMed
description We discuss the latest developments in alternative battery systems based on sodium, magnesium, zinc and aluminum. In each case, we categorize the individual metals by the overarching cathode material type, focusing on the energy storage mechanism. Specifically, sodium-ion batteries are the closest in technology and chemistry to today’s lithium-ion batteries. This lowers the technology transition barrier in the short term, but their low specific capacity creates a long-term problem. The lower reactivity of magnesium makes pure Mg metal anodes much safer than alkali ones. However, these are still reactive enough to be deactivated over time. Alloying magnesium with different metals can solve this problem. Combining this with different cathodes gives good specific capacities, but with a lower voltage (<1.3 V, compared with 3.8 V for Li-ion batteries). Zinc has the lowest theoretical specific capacity, but zinc metal anodes are so stable that they can be used without alterations. This results in comparable capacities to the other materials and can be immediately used in systems where weight is not a problem. Theoretically, aluminum is the most promising alternative, with its high specific capacity thanks to its three-electron redox reaction. However, the trade-off between stability and specific capacity is a problem. After analyzing each option separately, we compare them all via a political, economic, socio-cultural and technological (PEST) analysis. The review concludes with recommendations for future applications in the mobile and stationary power sectors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7013668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70136682020-03-09 Beyond Lithium-Based Batteries Biemolt, Jasper Jungbacker, Peter van Teijlingen, Tess Yan, Ning Rothenberg, Gadi Materials (Basel) Review We discuss the latest developments in alternative battery systems based on sodium, magnesium, zinc and aluminum. In each case, we categorize the individual metals by the overarching cathode material type, focusing on the energy storage mechanism. Specifically, sodium-ion batteries are the closest in technology and chemistry to today’s lithium-ion batteries. This lowers the technology transition barrier in the short term, but their low specific capacity creates a long-term problem. The lower reactivity of magnesium makes pure Mg metal anodes much safer than alkali ones. However, these are still reactive enough to be deactivated over time. Alloying magnesium with different metals can solve this problem. Combining this with different cathodes gives good specific capacities, but with a lower voltage (<1.3 V, compared with 3.8 V for Li-ion batteries). Zinc has the lowest theoretical specific capacity, but zinc metal anodes are so stable that they can be used without alterations. This results in comparable capacities to the other materials and can be immediately used in systems where weight is not a problem. Theoretically, aluminum is the most promising alternative, with its high specific capacity thanks to its three-electron redox reaction. However, the trade-off between stability and specific capacity is a problem. After analyzing each option separately, we compare them all via a political, economic, socio-cultural and technological (PEST) analysis. The review concludes with recommendations for future applications in the mobile and stationary power sectors. MDPI 2020-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7013668/ /pubmed/31963257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020425 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Biemolt, Jasper
Jungbacker, Peter
van Teijlingen, Tess
Yan, Ning
Rothenberg, Gadi
Beyond Lithium-Based Batteries
title Beyond Lithium-Based Batteries
title_full Beyond Lithium-Based Batteries
title_fullStr Beyond Lithium-Based Batteries
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Lithium-Based Batteries
title_short Beyond Lithium-Based Batteries
title_sort beyond lithium-based batteries
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020425
work_keys_str_mv AT biemoltjasper beyondlithiumbasedbatteries
AT jungbackerpeter beyondlithiumbasedbatteries
AT vanteijlingentess beyondlithiumbasedbatteries
AT yanning beyondlithiumbasedbatteries
AT rothenberggadi beyondlithiumbasedbatteries