Cargando…

Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things

Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordinati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seferagić, Amina, Famaey, Jeroen, De Poorter, Eli, Hoebeke, Jeroen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952214
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20020488
_version_ 1783496458541989888
author Seferagić, Amina
Famaey, Jeroen
De Poorter, Eli
Hoebeke, Jeroen
author_facet Seferagić, Amina
Famaey, Jeroen
De Poorter, Eli
Hoebeke, Jeroen
author_sort Seferagić, Amina
collection PubMed
description Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordination of production stages, connecting mobile robots and autonomous transport vehicles, as well as localization and tracking of assets. All these opportunities already inspired the development of many wireless technologies in an effort to fully enable Industry 4.0. However, different technologies significantly differ in performance and capabilities, none being capable of supporting all industrial use cases. When designing a network solution, one must be aware of the capabilities and the trade-offs that prospective technologies have. This paper evaluates the technologies potentially suitable for IWSAN solutions covering an entire industrial site with limited infrastructure cost and discusses their trade-offs in an effort to provide information for choosing the most suitable technology for the use case of interest. The comparative discussion presented in this paper aims to enable engineers to choose the most suitable wireless technology for their specific IWSAN deployment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7013676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70136762020-03-09 Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things Seferagić, Amina Famaey, Jeroen De Poorter, Eli Hoebeke, Jeroen Sensors (Basel) Review Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordination of production stages, connecting mobile robots and autonomous transport vehicles, as well as localization and tracking of assets. All these opportunities already inspired the development of many wireless technologies in an effort to fully enable Industry 4.0. However, different technologies significantly differ in performance and capabilities, none being capable of supporting all industrial use cases. When designing a network solution, one must be aware of the capabilities and the trade-offs that prospective technologies have. This paper evaluates the technologies potentially suitable for IWSAN solutions covering an entire industrial site with limited infrastructure cost and discusses their trade-offs in an effort to provide information for choosing the most suitable technology for the use case of interest. The comparative discussion presented in this paper aims to enable engineers to choose the most suitable wireless technology for their specific IWSAN deployment. MDPI 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7013676/ /pubmed/31952214 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20020488 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Seferagić, Amina
Famaey, Jeroen
De Poorter, Eli
Hoebeke, Jeroen
Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things
title Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things
title_full Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things
title_fullStr Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things
title_full_unstemmed Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things
title_short Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things
title_sort survey on wireless technology trade-offs for the industrial internet of things
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952214
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20020488
work_keys_str_mv AT seferagicamina surveyonwirelesstechnologytradeoffsfortheindustrialinternetofthings
AT famaeyjeroen surveyonwirelesstechnologytradeoffsfortheindustrialinternetofthings
AT depoortereli surveyonwirelesstechnologytradeoffsfortheindustrialinternetofthings
AT hoebekejeroen surveyonwirelesstechnologytradeoffsfortheindustrialinternetofthings