Cargando…

An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation

Objectives: In this functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study, we investigated the activation of cerebral pathways involved in the elaboration of self-retracting photos (SELF) and the same pictures of others (OTHER). Each of the photographs showed one of the participants during different stages of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cattoni, Francesca, Tetè, Giulia, Uccioli, Riccardo, Manazza, Fabio, Gastaldi, Giorgio, Perani, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020588
_version_ 1783496561156685824
author Cattoni, Francesca
Tetè, Giulia
Uccioli, Riccardo
Manazza, Fabio
Gastaldi, Giorgio
Perani, Daniela
author_facet Cattoni, Francesca
Tetè, Giulia
Uccioli, Riccardo
Manazza, Fabio
Gastaldi, Giorgio
Perani, Daniela
author_sort Cattoni, Francesca
collection PubMed
description Objectives: In this functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study, we investigated the activation of cerebral pathways involved in the elaboration of self-retracting photos (SELF) and the same pictures of others (OTHER). Each of the photographs showed one of the participants during different stages of the rehabilitation: pre-treatment (PRE), virtual planning using “Smile-Lynx” smile design software (VIR), and post-rehabilitation (POST). Methods: We selected eighteen volunteers, both male and female, between 22 and 67 years of age, who previously underwent prosthetic rehabilitation. Each of them was subjected to an fMRI acquisition. Various stimuli were then shown to the subjects in the form of self-retracting photographs and photographs of other participants, all in pseudo-randomized order. We then carried out a two- stage mixed-effects group data analysis with statistical contrast targeting two main effects: one regarding the main effect of Identity (SELF vs. OTHER) and the other regarding the effect of the prosthetic rehabilitation phase (PRE vs. VIR vs. POS). All the effects mentioned above survived a peak-level of p < 0.05. Results: For the effect of identity, results reported the involvement of dorsolateral frontoparietal areas bilaterally. For the phase by identity effect, results reported activation in the supplementary motor area (SMA) in the right hemisphere. A stronger activation in observing self-retracting photos (SELF) post-treatment (POST) was reported compared to the other phases considered in the experiment. Conclusions: All the collected data showed differences regarding the main effect of Identity (SELF vs. OTHER). Most importantly, the present study provides some trend-wise evidence that the pictures portraying the subject in their actual physiognomy (POST) have a somewhat special status in eliciting selectively greater brain activation in the SMA. This effect was interpreted as a plausible correlate of an empathic response for beautiful and neutral faces. The present research suggests a possible way to measure self-perception of the subject after an appearance-altering procedure such an implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. However, future clinical studies are needed to investigate this matter further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7014141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70141412020-03-09 An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation Cattoni, Francesca Tetè, Giulia Uccioli, Riccardo Manazza, Fabio Gastaldi, Giorgio Perani, Daniela Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Objectives: In this functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study, we investigated the activation of cerebral pathways involved in the elaboration of self-retracting photos (SELF) and the same pictures of others (OTHER). Each of the photographs showed one of the participants during different stages of the rehabilitation: pre-treatment (PRE), virtual planning using “Smile-Lynx” smile design software (VIR), and post-rehabilitation (POST). Methods: We selected eighteen volunteers, both male and female, between 22 and 67 years of age, who previously underwent prosthetic rehabilitation. Each of them was subjected to an fMRI acquisition. Various stimuli were then shown to the subjects in the form of self-retracting photographs and photographs of other participants, all in pseudo-randomized order. We then carried out a two- stage mixed-effects group data analysis with statistical contrast targeting two main effects: one regarding the main effect of Identity (SELF vs. OTHER) and the other regarding the effect of the prosthetic rehabilitation phase (PRE vs. VIR vs. POS). All the effects mentioned above survived a peak-level of p < 0.05. Results: For the effect of identity, results reported the involvement of dorsolateral frontoparietal areas bilaterally. For the phase by identity effect, results reported activation in the supplementary motor area (SMA) in the right hemisphere. A stronger activation in observing self-retracting photos (SELF) post-treatment (POST) was reported compared to the other phases considered in the experiment. Conclusions: All the collected data showed differences regarding the main effect of Identity (SELF vs. OTHER). Most importantly, the present study provides some trend-wise evidence that the pictures portraying the subject in their actual physiognomy (POST) have a somewhat special status in eliciting selectively greater brain activation in the SMA. This effect was interpreted as a plausible correlate of an empathic response for beautiful and neutral faces. The present research suggests a possible way to measure self-perception of the subject after an appearance-altering procedure such an implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. However, future clinical studies are needed to investigate this matter further. MDPI 2020-01-16 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7014141/ /pubmed/31963274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020588 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cattoni, Francesca
Tetè, Giulia
Uccioli, Riccardo
Manazza, Fabio
Gastaldi, Giorgio
Perani, Daniela
An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation
title An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation
title_full An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation
title_fullStr An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation
title_short An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation
title_sort fmri study on self-perception of patients after aesthetic implant-prosthetic rehabilitation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020588
work_keys_str_mv AT cattonifrancesca anfmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT tetegiulia anfmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT uccioliriccardo anfmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT manazzafabio anfmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT gastaldigiorgio anfmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT peranidaniela anfmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT cattonifrancesca fmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT tetegiulia fmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT uccioliriccardo fmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT manazzafabio fmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT gastaldigiorgio fmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation
AT peranidaniela fmristudyonselfperceptionofpatientsafteraestheticimplantprostheticrehabilitation