Cargando…

Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition

The implant surface features affect the osseointegration process. Different surface treatment methods have been applied to improve the surface topography and properties. Trace of different elements may appear on the implant surface, which can modify surface properties and may affect the body’s respo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel, Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio, Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan, Monsalve-Guil, Loreto, Gil, Javier, Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31936686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020314
_version_ 1783496609235992576
author Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel
Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan
Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
Gil, Javier
Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro
author_facet Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel
Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan
Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
Gil, Javier
Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro
author_sort Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel
collection PubMed
description The implant surface features affect the osseointegration process. Different surface treatment methods have been applied to improve the surface topography and properties. Trace of different elements may appear on the implant surface, which can modify surface properties and may affect the body’s response. The aim was to evaluate the roughness based on the surface treatment received and the amount and type of trace elements found. Ninety implants (nine different surface treatment) were evaluated. Roughness parameters were measured using white-light-interferometry (WLI). The arithmetical mean for R(a), R(q), R(t), and R(z) of each implant system was calculated, and Fisher’s exact test was applied, obtaining R(a) values between 0.79 and 2.89 µm. Surface chemical composition was evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) at two times: as received by the manufacturer (AR) and after sputter-cleaning (SC). Traces of several elements were found in all groups, decreasing in favor of the Ti concentration after the sputter-cleaning. Within the limitations of this study, we can conclude that the surface treatment influences the roughness and the average percentage of the trace elements on the implant surface. The cleaning process at the implant surface should be improved by the manufacturer before assembling the implant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7014346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70143462020-03-09 Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan Monsalve-Guil, Loreto Gil, Javier Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro Materials (Basel) Article The implant surface features affect the osseointegration process. Different surface treatment methods have been applied to improve the surface topography and properties. Trace of different elements may appear on the implant surface, which can modify surface properties and may affect the body’s response. The aim was to evaluate the roughness based on the surface treatment received and the amount and type of trace elements found. Ninety implants (nine different surface treatment) were evaluated. Roughness parameters were measured using white-light-interferometry (WLI). The arithmetical mean for R(a), R(q), R(t), and R(z) of each implant system was calculated, and Fisher’s exact test was applied, obtaining R(a) values between 0.79 and 2.89 µm. Surface chemical composition was evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) at two times: as received by the manufacturer (AR) and after sputter-cleaning (SC). Traces of several elements were found in all groups, decreasing in favor of the Ti concentration after the sputter-cleaning. Within the limitations of this study, we can conclude that the surface treatment influences the roughness and the average percentage of the trace elements on the implant surface. The cleaning process at the implant surface should be improved by the manufacturer before assembling the implant. MDPI 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7014346/ /pubmed/31936686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020314 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel
Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan
Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
Gil, Javier
Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro
Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition
title Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition
title_full Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition
title_fullStr Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition
title_short Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition
title_sort influence of the titanium implant surface treatment on the surface roughness and chemical composition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31936686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020314
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolassilventeanaisabel influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition
AT velascoortegaeugenio influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition
AT ortizgarciaivan influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition
AT monsalveguilloreto influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition
AT giljavier influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition
AT jimenezguerraalvaro influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition