Cargando…
Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition
The implant surface features affect the osseointegration process. Different surface treatment methods have been applied to improve the surface topography and properties. Trace of different elements may appear on the implant surface, which can modify surface properties and may affect the body’s respo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31936686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020314 |
_version_ | 1783496609235992576 |
---|---|
author | Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan Monsalve-Guil, Loreto Gil, Javier Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro |
author_facet | Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan Monsalve-Guil, Loreto Gil, Javier Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro |
author_sort | Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The implant surface features affect the osseointegration process. Different surface treatment methods have been applied to improve the surface topography and properties. Trace of different elements may appear on the implant surface, which can modify surface properties and may affect the body’s response. The aim was to evaluate the roughness based on the surface treatment received and the amount and type of trace elements found. Ninety implants (nine different surface treatment) were evaluated. Roughness parameters were measured using white-light-interferometry (WLI). The arithmetical mean for R(a), R(q), R(t), and R(z) of each implant system was calculated, and Fisher’s exact test was applied, obtaining R(a) values between 0.79 and 2.89 µm. Surface chemical composition was evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) at two times: as received by the manufacturer (AR) and after sputter-cleaning (SC). Traces of several elements were found in all groups, decreasing in favor of the Ti concentration after the sputter-cleaning. Within the limitations of this study, we can conclude that the surface treatment influences the roughness and the average percentage of the trace elements on the implant surface. The cleaning process at the implant surface should be improved by the manufacturer before assembling the implant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7014346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70143462020-03-09 Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan Monsalve-Guil, Loreto Gil, Javier Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro Materials (Basel) Article The implant surface features affect the osseointegration process. Different surface treatment methods have been applied to improve the surface topography and properties. Trace of different elements may appear on the implant surface, which can modify surface properties and may affect the body’s response. The aim was to evaluate the roughness based on the surface treatment received and the amount and type of trace elements found. Ninety implants (nine different surface treatment) were evaluated. Roughness parameters were measured using white-light-interferometry (WLI). The arithmetical mean for R(a), R(q), R(t), and R(z) of each implant system was calculated, and Fisher’s exact test was applied, obtaining R(a) values between 0.79 and 2.89 µm. Surface chemical composition was evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) at two times: as received by the manufacturer (AR) and after sputter-cleaning (SC). Traces of several elements were found in all groups, decreasing in favor of the Ti concentration after the sputter-cleaning. Within the limitations of this study, we can conclude that the surface treatment influences the roughness and the average percentage of the trace elements on the implant surface. The cleaning process at the implant surface should be improved by the manufacturer before assembling the implant. MDPI 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7014346/ /pubmed/31936686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020314 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nicolas-Silvente, Ana Isabel Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan Monsalve-Guil, Loreto Gil, Javier Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition |
title | Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition |
title_full | Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition |
title_fullStr | Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition |
title_short | Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition |
title_sort | influence of the titanium implant surface treatment on the surface roughness and chemical composition |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31936686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nicolassilventeanaisabel influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition AT velascoortegaeugenio influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition AT ortizgarciaivan influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition AT monsalveguilloreto influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition AT giljavier influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition AT jimenezguerraalvaro influenceofthetitaniumimplantsurfacetreatmentonthesurfaceroughnessandchemicalcomposition |