Cargando…
Benchmarking Deep Trackers on Aerial Videos
In recent years, deep learning-based visual object trackers have achieved state-of-the-art performance on several visual object tracking benchmarks. However, most tracking benchmarks are focused on ground level videos, whereas aerial tracking presents a new set of challenges. In this paper, we compa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20020547 |
_version_ | 1783496642635235328 |
---|---|
author | Taufique, Abu Md Niamul Minnehan, Breton Savakis, Andreas |
author_facet | Taufique, Abu Md Niamul Minnehan, Breton Savakis, Andreas |
author_sort | Taufique, Abu Md Niamul |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, deep learning-based visual object trackers have achieved state-of-the-art performance on several visual object tracking benchmarks. However, most tracking benchmarks are focused on ground level videos, whereas aerial tracking presents a new set of challenges. In this paper, we compare ten trackers based on deep learning techniques on four aerial datasets. We choose top performing trackers utilizing different approaches, specifically tracking by detection, discriminative correlation filters, Siamese networks and reinforcement learning. In our experiments, we use a subset of OTB2015 dataset with aerial style videos; the UAV123 dataset without synthetic sequences; the UAV20L dataset, which contains 20 long sequences; and DTB70 dataset as our benchmark datasets. We compare the advantages and disadvantages of different trackers in different tracking situations encountered in aerial data. Our findings indicate that the trackers perform significantly worse in aerial datasets compared to standard ground level videos. We attribute this effect to smaller target size, camera motion, significant camera rotation with respect to the target, out of view movement, and clutter in the form of occlusions or similar looking distractors near tracked object. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7014490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70144902020-03-09 Benchmarking Deep Trackers on Aerial Videos Taufique, Abu Md Niamul Minnehan, Breton Savakis, Andreas Sensors (Basel) Review In recent years, deep learning-based visual object trackers have achieved state-of-the-art performance on several visual object tracking benchmarks. However, most tracking benchmarks are focused on ground level videos, whereas aerial tracking presents a new set of challenges. In this paper, we compare ten trackers based on deep learning techniques on four aerial datasets. We choose top performing trackers utilizing different approaches, specifically tracking by detection, discriminative correlation filters, Siamese networks and reinforcement learning. In our experiments, we use a subset of OTB2015 dataset with aerial style videos; the UAV123 dataset without synthetic sequences; the UAV20L dataset, which contains 20 long sequences; and DTB70 dataset as our benchmark datasets. We compare the advantages and disadvantages of different trackers in different tracking situations encountered in aerial data. Our findings indicate that the trackers perform significantly worse in aerial datasets compared to standard ground level videos. We attribute this effect to smaller target size, camera motion, significant camera rotation with respect to the target, out of view movement, and clutter in the form of occlusions or similar looking distractors near tracked object. MDPI 2020-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7014490/ /pubmed/31963879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20020547 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Taufique, Abu Md Niamul Minnehan, Breton Savakis, Andreas Benchmarking Deep Trackers on Aerial Videos |
title | Benchmarking Deep Trackers on Aerial Videos |
title_full | Benchmarking Deep Trackers on Aerial Videos |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking Deep Trackers on Aerial Videos |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking Deep Trackers on Aerial Videos |
title_short | Benchmarking Deep Trackers on Aerial Videos |
title_sort | benchmarking deep trackers on aerial videos |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20020547 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taufiqueabumdniamul benchmarkingdeeptrackersonaerialvideos AT minnehanbreton benchmarkingdeeptrackersonaerialvideos AT savakisandreas benchmarkingdeeptrackersonaerialvideos |