Cargando…
A probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector
BACKGROUND: Construction workers are at a high risk of exposure to various types of hazardous substances such as crystalline silica. Though multiple studies indicate the evidence regarding the effectiveness of different silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector, the decision...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8307-7 |
_version_ | 1783496673186545664 |
---|---|
author | Mofidi, Amirabbas Tompa, Emile Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher Esfahanipour, Akbar Demers, Paul A. |
author_facet | Mofidi, Amirabbas Tompa, Emile Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher Esfahanipour, Akbar Demers, Paul A. |
author_sort | Mofidi, Amirabbas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Construction workers are at a high risk of exposure to various types of hazardous substances such as crystalline silica. Though multiple studies indicate the evidence regarding the effectiveness of different silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector, the decisions for selecting a specific silica exposure reduction intervention are best informed by an economic evaluation. Economic evaluation of interventions is subjected to uncertainties in practice, mostly due to the lack of precise data on important variables. In this study, we aim to identify the most cost-beneficial silica exposure reduction intervention for the construction sector under uncertain situations. METHODS: We apply a probabilistic modeling approach that covers a large number of variables relevant to the cost of lung cancer, as well as the costs of silica exposure reduction interventions. To estimate the societal lifetime cost of lung cancer, we use an incidence cost approach. To estimate the net benefit of each intervention, we compare the expected cost of lung cancer cases averted, with expected cost of implementation of the intervention in one calendar year. Sensitivity analysis is used to quantify how different variables affect interventions net benefit. RESULTS: A positive net benefit is expected for all considered interventions. The highest number of lung cancer cases are averted by combined use of wet method, local exhaust ventilation and personal protective equipment, about 107 cases, with expected net benefit of $45.9 million. Results also suggest that the level of exposure is an important determinant for the selection of the most cost-beneficial intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insights for decision makers about silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector. It also provides an overview of the potential advantages of using probabilistic modeling approach to undertake economic evaluations, particularly when researchers are confronted with a large number of uncertain variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7014628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70146282020-02-18 A probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector Mofidi, Amirabbas Tompa, Emile Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher Esfahanipour, Akbar Demers, Paul A. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Construction workers are at a high risk of exposure to various types of hazardous substances such as crystalline silica. Though multiple studies indicate the evidence regarding the effectiveness of different silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector, the decisions for selecting a specific silica exposure reduction intervention are best informed by an economic evaluation. Economic evaluation of interventions is subjected to uncertainties in practice, mostly due to the lack of precise data on important variables. In this study, we aim to identify the most cost-beneficial silica exposure reduction intervention for the construction sector under uncertain situations. METHODS: We apply a probabilistic modeling approach that covers a large number of variables relevant to the cost of lung cancer, as well as the costs of silica exposure reduction interventions. To estimate the societal lifetime cost of lung cancer, we use an incidence cost approach. To estimate the net benefit of each intervention, we compare the expected cost of lung cancer cases averted, with expected cost of implementation of the intervention in one calendar year. Sensitivity analysis is used to quantify how different variables affect interventions net benefit. RESULTS: A positive net benefit is expected for all considered interventions. The highest number of lung cancer cases are averted by combined use of wet method, local exhaust ventilation and personal protective equipment, about 107 cases, with expected net benefit of $45.9 million. Results also suggest that the level of exposure is an important determinant for the selection of the most cost-beneficial intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insights for decision makers about silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector. It also provides an overview of the potential advantages of using probabilistic modeling approach to undertake economic evaluations, particularly when researchers are confronted with a large number of uncertain variables. BioMed Central 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7014628/ /pubmed/32046683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8307-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mofidi, Amirabbas Tompa, Emile Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher Esfahanipour, Akbar Demers, Paul A. A probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector |
title | A probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector |
title_full | A probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector |
title_fullStr | A probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector |
title_full_unstemmed | A probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector |
title_short | A probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector |
title_sort | probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8307-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mofidiamirabbas aprobabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector AT tompaemile aprobabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector AT mortazaviseyedbagher aprobabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector AT esfahanipourakbar aprobabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector AT demerspaula aprobabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector AT mofidiamirabbas probabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector AT tompaemile probabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector AT mortazaviseyedbagher probabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector AT esfahanipourakbar probabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector AT demerspaula probabilisticapproachforeconomicevaluationofoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacasestudyofsilicaexposurereductioninterventionsintheconstructionsector |