Cargando…

How do applicants, students and physicians think about the feminisation of medicine? - a questionnaire-survey

BACKGROUND: The implications of the feminisation of medicine, which is characterised by a growing proportion of female doctors, is a topic currently being debated worldwide. To date, however, there has been no systematic survey of the viewpoint of present and future doctors on this subject. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laurence, D., Görlich, Y., Simmenroth, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1959-2
_version_ 1783496689551671296
author Laurence, D.
Görlich, Y.
Simmenroth, A.
author_facet Laurence, D.
Görlich, Y.
Simmenroth, A.
author_sort Laurence, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The implications of the feminisation of medicine, which is characterised by a growing proportion of female doctors, is a topic currently being debated worldwide. To date, however, there has been no systematic survey of the viewpoint of present and future doctors on this subject. The aim of the present study is to determine how future and present doctors view this trend in terms of its relevance to the medical profession and its present impacts. METHODS: Of a total sample of 3813 people, 181 applicants for the winter term 2014, 590 medical students and 225 doctors of the UMG participated in this cross-sectional electronic questionnaire. The answers were analysed by means of the statistics program IBM SPSS Statistics 22. Open answers were qualitatively evaluated and categorised using the “Basiswissengeleitete offene Kategorienfindung” (Werner Früh) and coded for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The majority of our participants favoured a balanced gender-ratio among doctors: 77% of applicants, 68% of students and 61% of doctors rated this as important or very important. The results from the student and applicant groups differed concerning female gender. When answering in the role of a patient, the doctor’s gender was found to be more relevant than when the participants were answering in the role of the doctor. The majority of the respondents opined that feminisation had had an impact on their workplace: particular factors included part-time work, work-related organisation and the diversity of the medical profession. Commentaries were mostly categorised as negative. CONCLUSIONS: The feminisation of medicine was viewed largely critically by the participants of this study. The respondents evaluated gender as being relevant for the medical profession and favoured a diverse workforce; however, the significance of one’s own gender in medical practice was underrated in comparison, implying a need for more awareness of the effect of a doctor’s gender on the patient-doctor-relationship. The mainly negative comments concerning the impact of feminisiation on work organisation, work satisfaction and patient care show the need for further research and action to adapt current medical work practices to the changing demographics in order to improve work satisfaction and quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7014700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70147002020-02-18 How do applicants, students and physicians think about the feminisation of medicine? - a questionnaire-survey Laurence, D. Görlich, Y. Simmenroth, A. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The implications of the feminisation of medicine, which is characterised by a growing proportion of female doctors, is a topic currently being debated worldwide. To date, however, there has been no systematic survey of the viewpoint of present and future doctors on this subject. The aim of the present study is to determine how future and present doctors view this trend in terms of its relevance to the medical profession and its present impacts. METHODS: Of a total sample of 3813 people, 181 applicants for the winter term 2014, 590 medical students and 225 doctors of the UMG participated in this cross-sectional electronic questionnaire. The answers were analysed by means of the statistics program IBM SPSS Statistics 22. Open answers were qualitatively evaluated and categorised using the “Basiswissengeleitete offene Kategorienfindung” (Werner Früh) and coded for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The majority of our participants favoured a balanced gender-ratio among doctors: 77% of applicants, 68% of students and 61% of doctors rated this as important or very important. The results from the student and applicant groups differed concerning female gender. When answering in the role of a patient, the doctor’s gender was found to be more relevant than when the participants were answering in the role of the doctor. The majority of the respondents opined that feminisation had had an impact on their workplace: particular factors included part-time work, work-related organisation and the diversity of the medical profession. Commentaries were mostly categorised as negative. CONCLUSIONS: The feminisation of medicine was viewed largely critically by the participants of this study. The respondents evaluated gender as being relevant for the medical profession and favoured a diverse workforce; however, the significance of one’s own gender in medical practice was underrated in comparison, implying a need for more awareness of the effect of a doctor’s gender on the patient-doctor-relationship. The mainly negative comments concerning the impact of feminisiation on work organisation, work satisfaction and patient care show the need for further research and action to adapt current medical work practices to the changing demographics in order to improve work satisfaction and quality of care. BioMed Central 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7014700/ /pubmed/32046693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1959-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Laurence, D.
Görlich, Y.
Simmenroth, A.
How do applicants, students and physicians think about the feminisation of medicine? - a questionnaire-survey
title How do applicants, students and physicians think about the feminisation of medicine? - a questionnaire-survey
title_full How do applicants, students and physicians think about the feminisation of medicine? - a questionnaire-survey
title_fullStr How do applicants, students and physicians think about the feminisation of medicine? - a questionnaire-survey
title_full_unstemmed How do applicants, students and physicians think about the feminisation of medicine? - a questionnaire-survey
title_short How do applicants, students and physicians think about the feminisation of medicine? - a questionnaire-survey
title_sort how do applicants, students and physicians think about the feminisation of medicine? - a questionnaire-survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1959-2
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenced howdoapplicantsstudentsandphysiciansthinkaboutthefeminisationofmedicineaquestionnairesurvey
AT gorlichy howdoapplicantsstudentsandphysiciansthinkaboutthefeminisationofmedicineaquestionnairesurvey
AT simmenrotha howdoapplicantsstudentsandphysiciansthinkaboutthefeminisationofmedicineaquestionnairesurvey