Cargando…

Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis

BACKGROUND: The distance between the central incisor to incisive papilla (CI-IP) is constant and regarded as one of the landmarks for the placement of artificial teeth in the prosthesis. Earlier studies were done in relation to anterior border of papilla but after extraction the incisive papilla rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karthik, K.V. Guru Charan, Padmaja, B. Indira, Babu, N. Suresh, Haritha, J., Nikhil, M., Priya, K. Shanthi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110608
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_772_19
_version_ 1783496729784483840
author Karthik, K.V. Guru Charan
Padmaja, B. Indira
Babu, N. Suresh
Haritha, J.
Nikhil, M.
Priya, K. Shanthi
author_facet Karthik, K.V. Guru Charan
Padmaja, B. Indira
Babu, N. Suresh
Haritha, J.
Nikhil, M.
Priya, K. Shanthi
author_sort Karthik, K.V. Guru Charan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The distance between the central incisor to incisive papilla (CI-IP) is constant and regarded as one of the landmarks for the placement of artificial teeth in the prosthesis. Earlier studies were done in relation to anterior border of papilla but after extraction the incisive papilla recedes changing the position of anterior border. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 100 dentulous subjects were divided into two groups (males and females) with 50 in each group. Maxillary alginate impressions were made and base poured using levelling instrument to standardize all casts and surveyed on the surveyor for uniformity of the casts. The measured distances were analyzed using Student t-test analysis. RESULTS: The ovoid arch was the commonest arch form found in both males and females with slightly more prevalent in females. Analysis was done using Student t-test analysis and found that the mean distance from CI-IP was found to be at 12.85 mm and 12.39 mm in males and females, respectively. CONCLUSION: When square arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP was compared with the total sample mean CI-IP, the mean CI-IP of square arch form was less than that of total sample with greater significance (P < 0.05). When ovoid arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP was compared with the square arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP, the mean CI-IP of ovoid arch form was greater than that of square arch form with greatest significance (P = 0).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7014900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70149002020-02-27 Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis Karthik, K.V. Guru Charan Padmaja, B. Indira Babu, N. Suresh Haritha, J. Nikhil, M. Priya, K. Shanthi J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: The distance between the central incisor to incisive papilla (CI-IP) is constant and regarded as one of the landmarks for the placement of artificial teeth in the prosthesis. Earlier studies were done in relation to anterior border of papilla but after extraction the incisive papilla recedes changing the position of anterior border. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 100 dentulous subjects were divided into two groups (males and females) with 50 in each group. Maxillary alginate impressions were made and base poured using levelling instrument to standardize all casts and surveyed on the surveyor for uniformity of the casts. The measured distances were analyzed using Student t-test analysis. RESULTS: The ovoid arch was the commonest arch form found in both males and females with slightly more prevalent in females. Analysis was done using Student t-test analysis and found that the mean distance from CI-IP was found to be at 12.85 mm and 12.39 mm in males and females, respectively. CONCLUSION: When square arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP was compared with the total sample mean CI-IP, the mean CI-IP of square arch form was less than that of total sample with greater significance (P < 0.05). When ovoid arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP was compared with the square arch form (both male and female) mean CI-IP, the mean CI-IP of ovoid arch form was greater than that of square arch form with greatest significance (P = 0). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7014900/ /pubmed/32110608 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_772_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karthik, K.V. Guru Charan
Padmaja, B. Indira
Babu, N. Suresh
Haritha, J.
Nikhil, M.
Priya, K. Shanthi
Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_full Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_fullStr Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_short Evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
title_sort evaluation of esthetics of incisor position in relation to incisive papilla to replicate in the denture prosthesis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110608
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_772_19
work_keys_str_mv AT karthikkvgurucharan evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT padmajabindira evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT babunsuresh evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT harithaj evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT nikhilm evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis
AT priyakshanthi evaluationofestheticsofincisorpositioninrelationtoincisivepapillatoreplicateinthedentureprosthesis