Cargando…

Comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in Uganda

BACKGROUND: Outcomes in observational studies may not best estimate those expected in the HIV vaccine efficacy trials. We compared retention in Simulated HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials (SiVETs) and observational cohorts drawn from two key populations in Uganda. METHODS: Two SiVETs were nested within tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abaasa, Andrew, Todd, Jim, Nash, Stephen, Mayanja, Yunia, Kaleebu, Pontiano, Fast, Patricia E., Price, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00920-4
_version_ 1783496736027705344
author Abaasa, Andrew
Todd, Jim
Nash, Stephen
Mayanja, Yunia
Kaleebu, Pontiano
Fast, Patricia E.
Price, Matt
author_facet Abaasa, Andrew
Todd, Jim
Nash, Stephen
Mayanja, Yunia
Kaleebu, Pontiano
Fast, Patricia E.
Price, Matt
author_sort Abaasa, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Outcomes in observational studies may not best estimate those expected in the HIV vaccine efficacy trials. We compared retention in Simulated HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials (SiVETs) and observational cohorts drawn from two key populations in Uganda. METHODS: Two SiVETs were nested within two observational cohorts, one in Fisherfolk (FF) and another one in Female Sex Workers (FSW). Adult participants in each observational cohort were screened for enrolment into SiVETs. Those screened-out or not screened continued participation in the observational (non-SiVET) cohorts. SiVET participants were administered a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in a schedule that mimicked an actual HIV vaccine efficacy trial. Both cohorts were followed for 12 months and retention was assessed through dropout, defined as lost to follow up, being uncontactable, refusal to continue or missing the last study clinic visit. Dropout rates were compared using Poisson models giving rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: Out of 1525 participants (565 FF and 960 FSW), 572 (38%) were enrolled into SiVETs (282-FF and 290-FSW), and 953 (62%) remained in the non-SiVET cohorts. Overall, 326 (101 SiVET, 225 non-SiVET) dropped out in 1260 Person Years of Observation (PYO), a dropout rate of 25.9 /100 PYO (95%CI: 23.2–28.8); fewer dropped out in the SiVET cohorts (18.4, 95% CI: 15.1–22.4) than in the non-SiVET cohorts (31.6, 95% CI: 27.8–36.1), rate ratio (RR) =0.58, 95% CI: 0.46–0.73. In all cohorts, the dropout was more marked in FSW than in FF population. Duration lived in community was associated with dropout in both SiVETs and religion in both non-SiVET cohorts. CONCLUSION: The rate of dropout was lower in SiVET compared to non-SiVET cohort. Though the difference in dropout between SiVET and non-SiVET was generally similar, the actual dropout rates were higher in the FSW population. Conduct of SiVETs in these key populations could mean that designing HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials will benefit from lower dropout rate shown in SiVET than non-SiVET observational cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7014936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70149362020-02-20 Comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in Uganda Abaasa, Andrew Todd, Jim Nash, Stephen Mayanja, Yunia Kaleebu, Pontiano Fast, Patricia E. Price, Matt BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Outcomes in observational studies may not best estimate those expected in the HIV vaccine efficacy trials. We compared retention in Simulated HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials (SiVETs) and observational cohorts drawn from two key populations in Uganda. METHODS: Two SiVETs were nested within two observational cohorts, one in Fisherfolk (FF) and another one in Female Sex Workers (FSW). Adult participants in each observational cohort were screened for enrolment into SiVETs. Those screened-out or not screened continued participation in the observational (non-SiVET) cohorts. SiVET participants were administered a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in a schedule that mimicked an actual HIV vaccine efficacy trial. Both cohorts were followed for 12 months and retention was assessed through dropout, defined as lost to follow up, being uncontactable, refusal to continue or missing the last study clinic visit. Dropout rates were compared using Poisson models giving rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: Out of 1525 participants (565 FF and 960 FSW), 572 (38%) were enrolled into SiVETs (282-FF and 290-FSW), and 953 (62%) remained in the non-SiVET cohorts. Overall, 326 (101 SiVET, 225 non-SiVET) dropped out in 1260 Person Years of Observation (PYO), a dropout rate of 25.9 /100 PYO (95%CI: 23.2–28.8); fewer dropped out in the SiVET cohorts (18.4, 95% CI: 15.1–22.4) than in the non-SiVET cohorts (31.6, 95% CI: 27.8–36.1), rate ratio (RR) =0.58, 95% CI: 0.46–0.73. In all cohorts, the dropout was more marked in FSW than in FF population. Duration lived in community was associated with dropout in both SiVETs and religion in both non-SiVET cohorts. CONCLUSION: The rate of dropout was lower in SiVET compared to non-SiVET cohort. Though the difference in dropout between SiVET and non-SiVET was generally similar, the actual dropout rates were higher in the FSW population. Conduct of SiVETs in these key populations could mean that designing HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials will benefit from lower dropout rate shown in SiVET than non-SiVET observational cohort. BioMed Central 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7014936/ /pubmed/32050900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00920-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abaasa, Andrew
Todd, Jim
Nash, Stephen
Mayanja, Yunia
Kaleebu, Pontiano
Fast, Patricia E.
Price, Matt
Comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in Uganda
title Comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in Uganda
title_full Comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in Uganda
title_fullStr Comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in Uganda
title_short Comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in Uganda
title_sort comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated hiv vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00920-4
work_keys_str_mv AT abaasaandrew comparisonofretentioninobservationalcohortsandnestedsimulatedhivvaccineefficacytrialsinthekeypopulationsinuganda
AT toddjim comparisonofretentioninobservationalcohortsandnestedsimulatedhivvaccineefficacytrialsinthekeypopulationsinuganda
AT nashstephen comparisonofretentioninobservationalcohortsandnestedsimulatedhivvaccineefficacytrialsinthekeypopulationsinuganda
AT mayanjayunia comparisonofretentioninobservationalcohortsandnestedsimulatedhivvaccineefficacytrialsinthekeypopulationsinuganda
AT kaleebupontiano comparisonofretentioninobservationalcohortsandnestedsimulatedhivvaccineefficacytrialsinthekeypopulationsinuganda
AT fastpatriciae comparisonofretentioninobservationalcohortsandnestedsimulatedhivvaccineefficacytrialsinthekeypopulationsinuganda
AT pricematt comparisonofretentioninobservationalcohortsandnestedsimulatedhivvaccineefficacytrialsinthekeypopulationsinuganda