Cargando…

Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends

INTRODUCTION: According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the male to female ratio of plastic surgeons is approximately 5:1. As more surgical specialties are recruiting female residents, there has been an increase in the amount of females. We set out to examine the current trends in resid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karamanos, Efstathios, Julian, Bao-Quynh, Wampler, Mallory, Sippel, Michael, Shah, Amita, Wang, Howard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002581
_version_ 1783496828327559168
author Karamanos, Efstathios
Julian, Bao-Quynh
Wampler, Mallory
Sippel, Michael
Shah, Amita
Wang, Howard
author_facet Karamanos, Efstathios
Julian, Bao-Quynh
Wampler, Mallory
Sippel, Michael
Shah, Amita
Wang, Howard
author_sort Karamanos, Efstathios
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the male to female ratio of plastic surgeons is approximately 5:1. As more surgical specialties are recruiting female residents, there has been an increase in the amount of females. We set out to examine the current trends in residency recruitment and whether a quantifiable gender bias exists. METHODS: A review of all the integrated plastic surgery programs within the United States was conducted. Data were collected regarding department or division status, the gender of the chairman and the program directors, the number of residents per year and gender of residents per year. The ratio of male to female residents was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 62 residency programs were identified. The vast majority had a male program director with only 8 female program directors identified. The mean ratio of female/male (F/M) residents overall was 1/1.2. Female program directors selected residents in the same ratio as their male counterparts [F/M ratio: 1/1.26 versus 1/1.18, p:0.813]. A linear logistic regression failed to identify the geographic location, department status, gender of the department chairman or the number of residents selected per year as predictors of higher F/M ratio. CONCLUSIONS: There are still fewer female program directors and residents in plastic surgery overall. However, neither was more likely to select a resident of their own gender. This analysis does not rule out the possible self-selection factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7015597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70155972020-02-24 Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends Karamanos, Efstathios Julian, Bao-Quynh Wampler, Mallory Sippel, Michael Shah, Amita Wang, Howard Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Special Topic INTRODUCTION: According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the male to female ratio of plastic surgeons is approximately 5:1. As more surgical specialties are recruiting female residents, there has been an increase in the amount of females. We set out to examine the current trends in residency recruitment and whether a quantifiable gender bias exists. METHODS: A review of all the integrated plastic surgery programs within the United States was conducted. Data were collected regarding department or division status, the gender of the chairman and the program directors, the number of residents per year and gender of residents per year. The ratio of male to female residents was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 62 residency programs were identified. The vast majority had a male program director with only 8 female program directors identified. The mean ratio of female/male (F/M) residents overall was 1/1.2. Female program directors selected residents in the same ratio as their male counterparts [F/M ratio: 1/1.26 versus 1/1.18, p:0.813]. A linear logistic regression failed to identify the geographic location, department status, gender of the department chairman or the number of residents selected per year as predictors of higher F/M ratio. CONCLUSIONS: There are still fewer female program directors and residents in plastic surgery overall. However, neither was more likely to select a resident of their own gender. This analysis does not rule out the possible self-selection factor. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7015597/ /pubmed/32095396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002581 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Special Topic
Karamanos, Efstathios
Julian, Bao-Quynh
Wampler, Mallory
Sippel, Michael
Shah, Amita
Wang, Howard
Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends
title Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends
title_full Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends
title_fullStr Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends
title_full_unstemmed Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends
title_short Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends
title_sort gender bias in the integrated plastic surgery residency: a snapshot of current trends
topic Special Topic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002581
work_keys_str_mv AT karamanosefstathios genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends
AT julianbaoquynh genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends
AT wamplermallory genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends
AT sippelmichael genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends
AT shahamita genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends
AT wanghoward genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends