Cargando…
Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends
INTRODUCTION: According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the male to female ratio of plastic surgeons is approximately 5:1. As more surgical specialties are recruiting female residents, there has been an increase in the amount of females. We set out to examine the current trends in resid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002581 |
_version_ | 1783496828327559168 |
---|---|
author | Karamanos, Efstathios Julian, Bao-Quynh Wampler, Mallory Sippel, Michael Shah, Amita Wang, Howard |
author_facet | Karamanos, Efstathios Julian, Bao-Quynh Wampler, Mallory Sippel, Michael Shah, Amita Wang, Howard |
author_sort | Karamanos, Efstathios |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the male to female ratio of plastic surgeons is approximately 5:1. As more surgical specialties are recruiting female residents, there has been an increase in the amount of females. We set out to examine the current trends in residency recruitment and whether a quantifiable gender bias exists. METHODS: A review of all the integrated plastic surgery programs within the United States was conducted. Data were collected regarding department or division status, the gender of the chairman and the program directors, the number of residents per year and gender of residents per year. The ratio of male to female residents was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 62 residency programs were identified. The vast majority had a male program director with only 8 female program directors identified. The mean ratio of female/male (F/M) residents overall was 1/1.2. Female program directors selected residents in the same ratio as their male counterparts [F/M ratio: 1/1.26 versus 1/1.18, p:0.813]. A linear logistic regression failed to identify the geographic location, department status, gender of the department chairman or the number of residents selected per year as predictors of higher F/M ratio. CONCLUSIONS: There are still fewer female program directors and residents in plastic surgery overall. However, neither was more likely to select a resident of their own gender. This analysis does not rule out the possible self-selection factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7015597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70155972020-02-24 Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends Karamanos, Efstathios Julian, Bao-Quynh Wampler, Mallory Sippel, Michael Shah, Amita Wang, Howard Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Special Topic INTRODUCTION: According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the male to female ratio of plastic surgeons is approximately 5:1. As more surgical specialties are recruiting female residents, there has been an increase in the amount of females. We set out to examine the current trends in residency recruitment and whether a quantifiable gender bias exists. METHODS: A review of all the integrated plastic surgery programs within the United States was conducted. Data were collected regarding department or division status, the gender of the chairman and the program directors, the number of residents per year and gender of residents per year. The ratio of male to female residents was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 62 residency programs were identified. The vast majority had a male program director with only 8 female program directors identified. The mean ratio of female/male (F/M) residents overall was 1/1.2. Female program directors selected residents in the same ratio as their male counterparts [F/M ratio: 1/1.26 versus 1/1.18, p:0.813]. A linear logistic regression failed to identify the geographic location, department status, gender of the department chairman or the number of residents selected per year as predictors of higher F/M ratio. CONCLUSIONS: There are still fewer female program directors and residents in plastic surgery overall. However, neither was more likely to select a resident of their own gender. This analysis does not rule out the possible self-selection factor. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7015597/ /pubmed/32095396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002581 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Special Topic Karamanos, Efstathios Julian, Bao-Quynh Wampler, Mallory Sippel, Michael Shah, Amita Wang, Howard Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends |
title | Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends |
title_full | Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends |
title_fullStr | Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends |
title_short | Gender Bias in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: A Snapshot of Current Trends |
title_sort | gender bias in the integrated plastic surgery residency: a snapshot of current trends |
topic | Special Topic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karamanosefstathios genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends AT julianbaoquynh genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends AT wamplermallory genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends AT sippelmichael genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends AT shahamita genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends AT wanghoward genderbiasintheintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencyasnapshotofcurrenttrends |