Cargando…

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The free flap failure rate is 5% in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction, and ischemia–reperfusion injury is an important mechanism behind this failure rate. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a recent intervention targeting ischemia–reperfusion injury. The aim of the presen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krag, Andreas E., Hvas, Anne-Mette, Hvas, Christine L., Kiil, Birgitte J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002591
_version_ 1783496831816171520
author Krag, Andreas E.
Hvas, Anne-Mette
Hvas, Christine L.
Kiil, Birgitte J.
author_facet Krag, Andreas E.
Hvas, Anne-Mette
Hvas, Christine L.
Kiil, Birgitte J.
author_sort Krag, Andreas E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The free flap failure rate is 5% in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction, and ischemia–reperfusion injury is an important mechanism behind this failure rate. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a recent intervention targeting ischemia–reperfusion injury. The aim of the present study was to investigate if RIPC improved clinical outcomes in microsurgical reconstruction. METHODS: Head and neck cancer patients undergoing tumor resection and microsurgical reconstruction were included in a randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized (1:1) to RIPC or sham intervention administered intraoperatively just before transfer of the free flap. RIPC was administered by four 5-minute periods of upper extremity occlusion and reperfusion. Clinical data were prospectively collected in the perioperative period and at follow-up on postoperative days 30 and 90. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized to RIPC (n = 30) or sham intervention (n = 30). All patients received allocated intervention. No patients were lost to follow up. At 30-day follow-up, flap failure occurred in 7% of RIPC patients (n = 2) and 3% of sham patients (n = 1) with the relative risk and 95% confidence interval 2.0 [0.2;20.9], P = 1.0. The rate of pedicle thrombosis was 10% (n = 3) in both groups with relative risk 1.0 [0.2;4.6], P = 1.0. The flap failure rate did not change at 90-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RIPC is safe and feasible but does not affect clinical outcomes in head and neck cancer patients undergoing microsurgical reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7015612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70156122020-02-24 Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial Krag, Andreas E. Hvas, Anne-Mette Hvas, Christine L. Kiil, Birgitte J. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The free flap failure rate is 5% in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction, and ischemia–reperfusion injury is an important mechanism behind this failure rate. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a recent intervention targeting ischemia–reperfusion injury. The aim of the present study was to investigate if RIPC improved clinical outcomes in microsurgical reconstruction. METHODS: Head and neck cancer patients undergoing tumor resection and microsurgical reconstruction were included in a randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized (1:1) to RIPC or sham intervention administered intraoperatively just before transfer of the free flap. RIPC was administered by four 5-minute periods of upper extremity occlusion and reperfusion. Clinical data were prospectively collected in the perioperative period and at follow-up on postoperative days 30 and 90. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized to RIPC (n = 30) or sham intervention (n = 30). All patients received allocated intervention. No patients were lost to follow up. At 30-day follow-up, flap failure occurred in 7% of RIPC patients (n = 2) and 3% of sham patients (n = 1) with the relative risk and 95% confidence interval 2.0 [0.2;20.9], P = 1.0. The rate of pedicle thrombosis was 10% (n = 3) in both groups with relative risk 1.0 [0.2;4.6], P = 1.0. The flap failure rate did not change at 90-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RIPC is safe and feasible but does not affect clinical outcomes in head and neck cancer patients undergoing microsurgical reconstruction. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7015612/ /pubmed/32095401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002591 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Krag, Andreas E.
Hvas, Anne-Mette
Hvas, Christine L.
Kiil, Birgitte J.
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort remote ischemic preconditioning in microsurgical head and neck reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002591
work_keys_str_mv AT kragandrease remoteischemicpreconditioninginmicrosurgicalheadandneckreconstructionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hvasannemette remoteischemicpreconditioninginmicrosurgicalheadandneckreconstructionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hvaschristinel remoteischemicpreconditioninginmicrosurgicalheadandneckreconstructionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kiilbirgittej remoteischemicpreconditioninginmicrosurgicalheadandneckreconstructionarandomizedcontrolledtrial