Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, CBMdisc, and VIP database were searched. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) was selected and the meta-anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiao-Qiang, Luo, Xian-Du, Wu, Yan-Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019064
_version_ 1783496834351628288
author Liu, Xiao-Qiang
Luo, Xian-Du
Wu, Yan-Qing
author_facet Liu, Xiao-Qiang
Luo, Xian-Du
Wu, Yan-Qing
author_sort Liu, Xiao-Qiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, CBMdisc, and VIP database were searched. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) was selected and the meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.1. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding. Secondary efficacy endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis (ST), stock, mortality, and thrombocytopenia. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin. RESULTS: Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and 16,640 patients were included. We found that bivalirudin associated with lower risk of mortality (RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.74–1.49; P = .03; I(2) = 2%), major bleeding (RR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.54–0.75; P < .00001; I(2) = 70%) and thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.25–0.61; P < .0001; I(2) = 0) compared with heparin. However, the use of bivalirudin increase the risk of MI(RR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.10–1.71; P = .004; I(2) = 25%) and ST(RR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.05–2.47; P = .03; I(2) = 70%) and has similar risk of MACE (RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.90–1.11; P = .97; I(2) = 16%), TVR (RR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.92–2.22; P = .11; I(2) = 46%) and stock (RR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.92–2.22; P = .11; I(2) = 46%) compared with heparin used in STEMI patients. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin associated with lower risk of mortality, major bleeding and thrombocytopenia compared with heparin. However, the use of bivalirudin increase the risk of MI and ST and has similar risk of MACE, TVR and stock compared with heparin used in STEMI patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7015623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70156232020-02-26 Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Liu, Xiao-Qiang Luo, Xian-Du Wu, Yan-Qing Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, CBMdisc, and VIP database were searched. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) was selected and the meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.1. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding. Secondary efficacy endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis (ST), stock, mortality, and thrombocytopenia. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin. RESULTS: Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and 16,640 patients were included. We found that bivalirudin associated with lower risk of mortality (RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.74–1.49; P = .03; I(2) = 2%), major bleeding (RR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.54–0.75; P < .00001; I(2) = 70%) and thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.25–0.61; P < .0001; I(2) = 0) compared with heparin. However, the use of bivalirudin increase the risk of MI(RR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.10–1.71; P = .004; I(2) = 25%) and ST(RR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.05–2.47; P = .03; I(2) = 70%) and has similar risk of MACE (RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.90–1.11; P = .97; I(2) = 16%), TVR (RR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.92–2.22; P = .11; I(2) = 46%) and stock (RR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.92–2.22; P = .11; I(2) = 46%) compared with heparin used in STEMI patients. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin associated with lower risk of mortality, major bleeding and thrombocytopenia compared with heparin. However, the use of bivalirudin increase the risk of MI and ST and has similar risk of MACE, TVR and stock compared with heparin used in STEMI patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7015623/ /pubmed/32028428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019064 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 3400
Liu, Xiao-Qiang
Luo, Xian-Du
Wu, Yan-Qing
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic 3400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019064
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiaoqiang efficacyandsafetyofbivalirudinvsheparininpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseaseundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT luoxiandu efficacyandsafetyofbivalirudinvsheparininpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseaseundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuyanqing efficacyandsafetyofbivalirudinvsheparininpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseaseundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials