Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, CBMdisc, and VIP database were searched. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) was selected and the meta-anal...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019064 |
_version_ | 1783496834351628288 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xiao-Qiang Luo, Xian-Du Wu, Yan-Qing |
author_facet | Liu, Xiao-Qiang Luo, Xian-Du Wu, Yan-Qing |
author_sort | Liu, Xiao-Qiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, CBMdisc, and VIP database were searched. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) was selected and the meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.1. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding. Secondary efficacy endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis (ST), stock, mortality, and thrombocytopenia. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin. RESULTS: Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and 16,640 patients were included. We found that bivalirudin associated with lower risk of mortality (RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.74–1.49; P = .03; I(2) = 2%), major bleeding (RR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.54–0.75; P < .00001; I(2) = 70%) and thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.25–0.61; P < .0001; I(2) = 0) compared with heparin. However, the use of bivalirudin increase the risk of MI(RR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.10–1.71; P = .004; I(2) = 25%) and ST(RR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.05–2.47; P = .03; I(2) = 70%) and has similar risk of MACE (RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.90–1.11; P = .97; I(2) = 16%), TVR (RR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.92–2.22; P = .11; I(2) = 46%) and stock (RR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.92–2.22; P = .11; I(2) = 46%) compared with heparin used in STEMI patients. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin associated with lower risk of mortality, major bleeding and thrombocytopenia compared with heparin. However, the use of bivalirudin increase the risk of MI and ST and has similar risk of MACE, TVR and stock compared with heparin used in STEMI patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7015623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70156232020-02-26 Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Liu, Xiao-Qiang Luo, Xian-Du Wu, Yan-Qing Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, CBMdisc, and VIP database were searched. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) was selected and the meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.1. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding. Secondary efficacy endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis (ST), stock, mortality, and thrombocytopenia. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin. RESULTS: Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and 16,640 patients were included. We found that bivalirudin associated with lower risk of mortality (RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.74–1.49; P = .03; I(2) = 2%), major bleeding (RR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.54–0.75; P < .00001; I(2) = 70%) and thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.25–0.61; P < .0001; I(2) = 0) compared with heparin. However, the use of bivalirudin increase the risk of MI(RR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.10–1.71; P = .004; I(2) = 25%) and ST(RR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.05–2.47; P = .03; I(2) = 70%) and has similar risk of MACE (RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.90–1.11; P = .97; I(2) = 16%), TVR (RR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.92–2.22; P = .11; I(2) = 46%) and stock (RR = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.92–2.22; P = .11; I(2) = 46%) compared with heparin used in STEMI patients. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin associated with lower risk of mortality, major bleeding and thrombocytopenia compared with heparin. However, the use of bivalirudin increase the risk of MI and ST and has similar risk of MACE, TVR and stock compared with heparin used in STEMI patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7015623/ /pubmed/32028428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019064 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3400 Liu, Xiao-Qiang Luo, Xian-Du Wu, Yan-Qing Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of bivalirudin vs heparin in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | 3400 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32028428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxiaoqiang efficacyandsafetyofbivalirudinvsheparininpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseaseundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT luoxiandu efficacyandsafetyofbivalirudinvsheparininpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseaseundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wuyanqing efficacyandsafetyofbivalirudinvsheparininpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseaseundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |