Cargando…

Prognostic Impact of Menopausal Hormone Therapy in Breast Cancer Differs According to Tumor Characteristics and Treatment

This study investigated how a history of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) impacts clinical outcomes overall and in different subgroups of breast cancer patients. The study included 814 primary breast cancer patients aged ≥50 years in Sweden (2002–2012) with follow-up until 2016. Associations between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godina, Christopher, Ottander, Erik, Tryggvadottir, Helga, Borgquist, Signe, Isaksson, Karolin, Jernström, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32117735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00080
Descripción
Sumario:This study investigated how a history of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) impacts clinical outcomes overall and in different subgroups of breast cancer patients. The study included 814 primary breast cancer patients aged ≥50 years in Sweden (2002–2012) with follow-up until 2016. Associations between patient- and tumor characteristics, recurrences, and overall survival were analyzed in relation to MHT. After a median follow-up of 7 years, 119 recurrences, and 111 deaths occurred. Ever MHT (n = 433, 53.2%) was associated with a lower BMI, frequency of alcohol abstinence, and histological grade, higher frequency of oral contraceptive use, and lobular cancer. Overall, MHT was not associated with prognosis, but there were significant effect modifications by estrogen receptor (ER) status, node status, main histological type, and aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment on recurrence-risk (all P(interactions)≤ 0.017). MHT conferred an increased recurrence-risk in patients with ER- tumors, adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR(adj)) 3.99 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.40–11.33), in node-negative patients HR(adj) 1.88 (95% CI 1.11–3.17), and in non-AI-treated patients HR(adj) 1.81 (95% CI 1.01–3.24), but decreased recurrence-risk in AI-treated patients HR(adj) 0.46 (95% CI 0.25–0.84) and in patients with lobular cancer HR(adj) 0.15 (95% CI 0.04–0.64). MHT was associated with lower risk of death in node-positive patients HR(adj) of 0.48 (95% CI 0.27–0.86) and in AI-treated patients HR(adj) of 0.41 (95% CI 0.22–0.77), but not in other patients (both P(interactions)≤ 0.027). A history of MHT may have prognostic value for certain subgroups of breast cancer patients such as AI-treated or node-negative patients.