Cargando…

Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the extent of bacterial contamination in water from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs). METHODOLOGY: Water samples were collected (before flushing, 1 min post-flushing, and 3 min post-flushing) from 24 clinics (Group A: no disinfection, Group B: citric acid disinfectant) of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alkhulaifi, Manal M., Alotaibi, Dalal H., Alajlan, Hisham, Binshoail, Thekra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32071534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.07.003
_version_ 1783496941355663360
author Alkhulaifi, Manal M.
Alotaibi, Dalal H.
Alajlan, Hisham
Binshoail, Thekra
author_facet Alkhulaifi, Manal M.
Alotaibi, Dalal H.
Alajlan, Hisham
Binshoail, Thekra
author_sort Alkhulaifi, Manal M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluated the extent of bacterial contamination in water from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs). METHODOLOGY: Water samples were collected (before flushing, 1 min post-flushing, and 3 min post-flushing) from 24 clinics (Group A: no disinfection, Group B: citric acid disinfectant) of a Government Dental College. Bacterial counts, identification, antibiotic sensitivity tests, determination of endotoxin levels, and scanning electron microscopy (to confirm the presence of biofilm) were performed. RESULTS: The most common opportunistic bacteria were P. aeruginosa (95%), S. aureus (58%), S. auricularis (49%), P. fluorescens (44%), and A. baumannii (20%). Approximately 50% of the bacterial isolates were resistant to two or more antibiotics. Flushing for 3 min did not reduce the contamination of water from Group A clinics which exceeded the recommendation of ≤500 CFU/ml. No bacterial growth was seen in Group B samples. Endotoxin levels were >5.00 endotoxin units (EU)/ml in Group A and ranged from 1.33 to 5.00 EU/ml in Group B clinics. Scanning electron microscopy images showed bacterial biofilms on the surfaces of the tubes. CONCLUSIONS: DUWL contamination is a serious issue in dentistry, and the microbiological quality of the water must be monitored regularly. Further studies on endotoxin exposure and prevention are therefore necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7016225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70162252020-02-18 Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing Alkhulaifi, Manal M. Alotaibi, Dalal H. Alajlan, Hisham Binshoail, Thekra Saudi Dent J Original Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated the extent of bacterial contamination in water from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs). METHODOLOGY: Water samples were collected (before flushing, 1 min post-flushing, and 3 min post-flushing) from 24 clinics (Group A: no disinfection, Group B: citric acid disinfectant) of a Government Dental College. Bacterial counts, identification, antibiotic sensitivity tests, determination of endotoxin levels, and scanning electron microscopy (to confirm the presence of biofilm) were performed. RESULTS: The most common opportunistic bacteria were P. aeruginosa (95%), S. aureus (58%), S. auricularis (49%), P. fluorescens (44%), and A. baumannii (20%). Approximately 50% of the bacterial isolates were resistant to two or more antibiotics. Flushing for 3 min did not reduce the contamination of water from Group A clinics which exceeded the recommendation of ≤500 CFU/ml. No bacterial growth was seen in Group B samples. Endotoxin levels were >5.00 endotoxin units (EU)/ml in Group A and ranged from 1.33 to 5.00 EU/ml in Group B clinics. Scanning electron microscopy images showed bacterial biofilms on the surfaces of the tubes. CONCLUSIONS: DUWL contamination is a serious issue in dentistry, and the microbiological quality of the water must be monitored regularly. Further studies on endotoxin exposure and prevention are therefore necessary. Elsevier 2020-02 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7016225/ /pubmed/32071534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.07.003 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Alkhulaifi, Manal M.
Alotaibi, Dalal H.
Alajlan, Hisham
Binshoail, Thekra
Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing
title Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing
title_full Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing
title_fullStr Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing
title_short Assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: Impact of flushing
title_sort assessment of nosocomial bacterial contamination in dental unit waterlines: impact of flushing
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32071534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT alkhulaifimanalm assessmentofnosocomialbacterialcontaminationindentalunitwaterlinesimpactofflushing
AT alotaibidalalh assessmentofnosocomialbacterialcontaminationindentalunitwaterlinesimpactofflushing
AT alajlanhisham assessmentofnosocomialbacterialcontaminationindentalunitwaterlinesimpactofflushing
AT binshoailthekra assessmentofnosocomialbacterialcontaminationindentalunitwaterlinesimpactofflushing