Cargando…

The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND: Acellular matrix (AM) therapy has shown promise in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in several studies. The clinical effects of AM therapy were not well established. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Wentao, Chen, Yongsong, Wang, Nasui, Yin, Guoshu, Wei, Chiju, Xu, Wencan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6245758
_version_ 1783496989417144320
author Huang, Wentao
Chen, Yongsong
Wang, Nasui
Yin, Guoshu
Wei, Chiju
Xu, Wencan
author_facet Huang, Wentao
Chen, Yongsong
Wang, Nasui
Yin, Guoshu
Wei, Chiju
Xu, Wencan
author_sort Huang, Wentao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acellular matrix (AM) therapy has shown promise in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in several studies. The clinical effects of AM therapy were not well established. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of AM therapy for patients with DFUs. METHODS: A literature search of 5 databases was performed to identify RCTs comparing AM therapy to standard therapy (ST) in patients with DFUs. The primary outcome was the complete healing rate and the secondary outcomes mainly included time to complete healing and adverse events. RESULTS: Nine RCTs involving 897 patients were included. Compared with ST group, patients allocated to AM group had a higher complete healing rate both at 12 weeks (risk ratio (RR) = 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 2.30) and 16 weeks (RR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.91), a shorter time to complete healing (mean difference (MD) = −2.41; 95% CI: -3.49 to -1.32), and fewer adverse events (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.93). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that AM therapy as an adjuvant treatment could further promote the healing of full-thickness, noninfected, and nonischemia DFUs. AM therapy also has a safety profile. More large well-designed randomized clinical trials with long follow-up duration are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of AM therapy for DFUs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7016477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70164772020-02-23 The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Huang, Wentao Chen, Yongsong Wang, Nasui Yin, Guoshu Wei, Chiju Xu, Wencan J Diabetes Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Acellular matrix (AM) therapy has shown promise in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in several studies. The clinical effects of AM therapy were not well established. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of AM therapy for patients with DFUs. METHODS: A literature search of 5 databases was performed to identify RCTs comparing AM therapy to standard therapy (ST) in patients with DFUs. The primary outcome was the complete healing rate and the secondary outcomes mainly included time to complete healing and adverse events. RESULTS: Nine RCTs involving 897 patients were included. Compared with ST group, patients allocated to AM group had a higher complete healing rate both at 12 weeks (risk ratio (RR) = 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 2.30) and 16 weeks (RR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.91), a shorter time to complete healing (mean difference (MD) = −2.41; 95% CI: -3.49 to -1.32), and fewer adverse events (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.93). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that AM therapy as an adjuvant treatment could further promote the healing of full-thickness, noninfected, and nonischemia DFUs. AM therapy also has a safety profile. More large well-designed randomized clinical trials with long follow-up duration are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of AM therapy for DFUs. Hindawi 2020-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7016477/ /pubmed/32090122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6245758 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wentao Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Wentao
Chen, Yongsong
Wang, Nasui
Yin, Guoshu
Wei, Chiju
Xu, Wencan
The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of acellular matrix therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6245758
work_keys_str_mv AT huangwentao theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT chenyongsong theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT wangnasui theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT yinguoshu theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT weichiju theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT xuwencan theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT huangwentao efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT chenyongsong efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT wangnasui efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT yinguoshu efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT weichiju efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT xuwencan efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials