Cargando…
The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
BACKGROUND: Acellular matrix (AM) therapy has shown promise in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in several studies. The clinical effects of AM therapy were not well established. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6245758 |
_version_ | 1783496989417144320 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Wentao Chen, Yongsong Wang, Nasui Yin, Guoshu Wei, Chiju Xu, Wencan |
author_facet | Huang, Wentao Chen, Yongsong Wang, Nasui Yin, Guoshu Wei, Chiju Xu, Wencan |
author_sort | Huang, Wentao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acellular matrix (AM) therapy has shown promise in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in several studies. The clinical effects of AM therapy were not well established. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of AM therapy for patients with DFUs. METHODS: A literature search of 5 databases was performed to identify RCTs comparing AM therapy to standard therapy (ST) in patients with DFUs. The primary outcome was the complete healing rate and the secondary outcomes mainly included time to complete healing and adverse events. RESULTS: Nine RCTs involving 897 patients were included. Compared with ST group, patients allocated to AM group had a higher complete healing rate both at 12 weeks (risk ratio (RR) = 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 2.30) and 16 weeks (RR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.91), a shorter time to complete healing (mean difference (MD) = −2.41; 95% CI: -3.49 to -1.32), and fewer adverse events (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.93). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that AM therapy as an adjuvant treatment could further promote the healing of full-thickness, noninfected, and nonischemia DFUs. AM therapy also has a safety profile. More large well-designed randomized clinical trials with long follow-up duration are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of AM therapy for DFUs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7016477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70164772020-02-23 The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Huang, Wentao Chen, Yongsong Wang, Nasui Yin, Guoshu Wei, Chiju Xu, Wencan J Diabetes Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Acellular matrix (AM) therapy has shown promise in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in several studies. The clinical effects of AM therapy were not well established. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of AM therapy for patients with DFUs. METHODS: A literature search of 5 databases was performed to identify RCTs comparing AM therapy to standard therapy (ST) in patients with DFUs. The primary outcome was the complete healing rate and the secondary outcomes mainly included time to complete healing and adverse events. RESULTS: Nine RCTs involving 897 patients were included. Compared with ST group, patients allocated to AM group had a higher complete healing rate both at 12 weeks (risk ratio (RR) = 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 2.30) and 16 weeks (RR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.91), a shorter time to complete healing (mean difference (MD) = −2.41; 95% CI: -3.49 to -1.32), and fewer adverse events (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.93). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that AM therapy as an adjuvant treatment could further promote the healing of full-thickness, noninfected, and nonischemia DFUs. AM therapy also has a safety profile. More large well-designed randomized clinical trials with long follow-up duration are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of AM therapy for DFUs. Hindawi 2020-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7016477/ /pubmed/32090122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6245758 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wentao Huang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Wentao Chen, Yongsong Wang, Nasui Yin, Guoshu Wei, Chiju Xu, Wencan The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title | The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_full | The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_short | The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of acellular matrix therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6245758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangwentao theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT chenyongsong theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT wangnasui theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT yinguoshu theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT weichiju theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT xuwencan theefficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT huangwentao efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT chenyongsong efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT wangnasui efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT yinguoshu efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT weichiju efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT xuwencan efficacyandsafetyofacellularmatrixtherapyfordiabeticfootulcersametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials |