Cargando…
Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage
Ionising radiation (IR) is known to induce a wide variety of lesions in DNA. In this review, we compared three different techniques that examined the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage at nucleotide resolution. These three techniques were: the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11010008 |
_version_ | 1783497034295148544 |
---|---|
author | Murray, Vincent Hardie, Megan E. Gautam, Shweta D. |
author_facet | Murray, Vincent Hardie, Megan E. Gautam, Shweta D. |
author_sort | Murray, Vincent |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ionising radiation (IR) is known to induce a wide variety of lesions in DNA. In this review, we compared three different techniques that examined the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage at nucleotide resolution. These three techniques were: the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay, the end-labelling procedure, and Illumina next-generation genome-wide sequencing. The DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage was compared in purified DNA sequences including human genomic DNA. It was found that the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage identified by the end-labelling procedure (that mainly detected single-strand breaks) and Illumina next-generation genome-wide sequencing (that mainly detected double-strand breaks) was at C nucleotides, while the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay (that mainly detected base damage) was at G nucleotides. A consensus sequence at the IR-induced DNA damage was found to be 5′-AGGC*C for the end-labelling technique, 5′-GGC*MH (where * is the cleavage site, M is A or C, H is any nucleotide except G) for the genome-wide technique, and 5′-GG* for the linear amplification/polymerase stop procedure. These three different approaches are important because they provide a deeper insight into the mechanism of action of IR-induced DNA damage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7016695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70166952020-02-28 Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Murray, Vincent Hardie, Megan E. Gautam, Shweta D. Genes (Basel) Article Ionising radiation (IR) is known to induce a wide variety of lesions in DNA. In this review, we compared three different techniques that examined the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage at nucleotide resolution. These three techniques were: the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay, the end-labelling procedure, and Illumina next-generation genome-wide sequencing. The DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage was compared in purified DNA sequences including human genomic DNA. It was found that the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage identified by the end-labelling procedure (that mainly detected single-strand breaks) and Illumina next-generation genome-wide sequencing (that mainly detected double-strand breaks) was at C nucleotides, while the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay (that mainly detected base damage) was at G nucleotides. A consensus sequence at the IR-induced DNA damage was found to be 5′-AGGC*C for the end-labelling technique, 5′-GGC*MH (where * is the cleavage site, M is A or C, H is any nucleotide except G) for the genome-wide technique, and 5′-GG* for the linear amplification/polymerase stop procedure. These three different approaches are important because they provide a deeper insight into the mechanism of action of IR-induced DNA damage. MDPI 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7016695/ /pubmed/31861886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11010008 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Murray, Vincent Hardie, Megan E. Gautam, Shweta D. Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage |
title | Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage |
title_full | Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage |
title_short | Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage |
title_sort | comparison of different methods to determine the dna sequence preference of ionising radiation-induced dna damage |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11010008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murrayvincent comparisonofdifferentmethodstodeterminethednasequencepreferenceofionisingradiationinduceddnadamage AT hardiemegane comparisonofdifferentmethodstodeterminethednasequencepreferenceofionisingradiationinduceddnadamage AT gautamshwetad comparisonofdifferentmethodstodeterminethednasequencepreferenceofionisingradiationinduceddnadamage |