Cargando…

Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage

Ionising radiation (IR) is known to induce a wide variety of lesions in DNA. In this review, we compared three different techniques that examined the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage at nucleotide resolution. These three techniques were: the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murray, Vincent, Hardie, Megan E., Gautam, Shweta D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11010008
_version_ 1783497034295148544
author Murray, Vincent
Hardie, Megan E.
Gautam, Shweta D.
author_facet Murray, Vincent
Hardie, Megan E.
Gautam, Shweta D.
author_sort Murray, Vincent
collection PubMed
description Ionising radiation (IR) is known to induce a wide variety of lesions in DNA. In this review, we compared three different techniques that examined the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage at nucleotide resolution. These three techniques were: the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay, the end-labelling procedure, and Illumina next-generation genome-wide sequencing. The DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage was compared in purified DNA sequences including human genomic DNA. It was found that the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage identified by the end-labelling procedure (that mainly detected single-strand breaks) and Illumina next-generation genome-wide sequencing (that mainly detected double-strand breaks) was at C nucleotides, while the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay (that mainly detected base damage) was at G nucleotides. A consensus sequence at the IR-induced DNA damage was found to be 5′-AGGC*C for the end-labelling technique, 5′-GGC*MH (where * is the cleavage site, M is A or C, H is any nucleotide except G) for the genome-wide technique, and 5′-GG* for the linear amplification/polymerase stop procedure. These three different approaches are important because they provide a deeper insight into the mechanism of action of IR-induced DNA damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7016695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70166952020-02-28 Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Murray, Vincent Hardie, Megan E. Gautam, Shweta D. Genes (Basel) Article Ionising radiation (IR) is known to induce a wide variety of lesions in DNA. In this review, we compared three different techniques that examined the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage at nucleotide resolution. These three techniques were: the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay, the end-labelling procedure, and Illumina next-generation genome-wide sequencing. The DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage was compared in purified DNA sequences including human genomic DNA. It was found that the DNA sequence preference of IR-induced DNA damage identified by the end-labelling procedure (that mainly detected single-strand breaks) and Illumina next-generation genome-wide sequencing (that mainly detected double-strand breaks) was at C nucleotides, while the linear amplification/polymerase stop assay (that mainly detected base damage) was at G nucleotides. A consensus sequence at the IR-induced DNA damage was found to be 5′-AGGC*C for the end-labelling technique, 5′-GGC*MH (where * is the cleavage site, M is A or C, H is any nucleotide except G) for the genome-wide technique, and 5′-GG* for the linear amplification/polymerase stop procedure. These three different approaches are important because they provide a deeper insight into the mechanism of action of IR-induced DNA damage. MDPI 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7016695/ /pubmed/31861886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11010008 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Murray, Vincent
Hardie, Megan E.
Gautam, Shweta D.
Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage
title Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage
title_full Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage
title_short Comparison of Different Methods to Determine the DNA Sequence Preference of Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Damage
title_sort comparison of different methods to determine the dna sequence preference of ionising radiation-induced dna damage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11010008
work_keys_str_mv AT murrayvincent comparisonofdifferentmethodstodeterminethednasequencepreferenceofionisingradiationinduceddnadamage
AT hardiemegane comparisonofdifferentmethodstodeterminethednasequencepreferenceofionisingradiationinduceddnadamage
AT gautamshwetad comparisonofdifferentmethodstodeterminethednasequencepreferenceofionisingradiationinduceddnadamage