Cargando…

Neuromuscular Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Force Production during an Attentional Focus Task

We examined the effects of attentional focus cues on maximal voluntary force output of the elbow flexors and the underlying physiological mechanisms. Eleven males participated in two randomized experimental sessions. In each session, four randomized blocks of three maximal voluntary contractions (MV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiseman, Shawn, Alizadeh, Shahab, Halperin, Israel, Lahouti, Behzad, Snow, Nicholas J., Power, Kevin E., Button, Duane C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31936030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010033
_version_ 1783497035887935488
author Wiseman, Shawn
Alizadeh, Shahab
Halperin, Israel
Lahouti, Behzad
Snow, Nicholas J.
Power, Kevin E.
Button, Duane C.
author_facet Wiseman, Shawn
Alizadeh, Shahab
Halperin, Israel
Lahouti, Behzad
Snow, Nicholas J.
Power, Kevin E.
Button, Duane C.
author_sort Wiseman, Shawn
collection PubMed
description We examined the effects of attentional focus cues on maximal voluntary force output of the elbow flexors and the underlying physiological mechanisms. Eleven males participated in two randomized experimental sessions. In each session, four randomized blocks of three maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) were performed. The blocks consisted of two externally and two internally attentional focus cued blocks. In one of the sessions, corticospinal excitability (CSE) was measured. During the stimulation session transcranial magnetic, transmastoid and Erb’s point stimulations were used to induce motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary MEP (CMEPs) and maximal muscle action potential (Mmax), respectively in the biceps brachii. Across both sessions forces were lower (p = 0.024) under the internal (282.4 ± 60.3 N) compared to the external condition (310.7 ± 11.3 N). Muscle co-activation was greater (p = 0.016) under the internal (26.3 ± 11.5%) compared with the external condition (21.5 ± 9.4%). There was no change in CSE. Across both sessions, force measurements were lower (p = 0.033) during the stimulation (279.0 ± 47.1 N) compared with the no-stimulation session (314.1 ± 57.5 N). In conclusion, external focus increased force, likely due to reduced co-activation. Stimulating the corticospinal pathway may confound attentional focus. The stimulations may distract participants from the cues and/or disrupt areas of the cortex responsible for attention and focus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7016702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70167022020-02-28 Neuromuscular Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Force Production during an Attentional Focus Task Wiseman, Shawn Alizadeh, Shahab Halperin, Israel Lahouti, Behzad Snow, Nicholas J. Power, Kevin E. Button, Duane C. Brain Sci Article We examined the effects of attentional focus cues on maximal voluntary force output of the elbow flexors and the underlying physiological mechanisms. Eleven males participated in two randomized experimental sessions. In each session, four randomized blocks of three maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) were performed. The blocks consisted of two externally and two internally attentional focus cued blocks. In one of the sessions, corticospinal excitability (CSE) was measured. During the stimulation session transcranial magnetic, transmastoid and Erb’s point stimulations were used to induce motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary MEP (CMEPs) and maximal muscle action potential (Mmax), respectively in the biceps brachii. Across both sessions forces were lower (p = 0.024) under the internal (282.4 ± 60.3 N) compared to the external condition (310.7 ± 11.3 N). Muscle co-activation was greater (p = 0.016) under the internal (26.3 ± 11.5%) compared with the external condition (21.5 ± 9.4%). There was no change in CSE. Across both sessions, force measurements were lower (p = 0.033) during the stimulation (279.0 ± 47.1 N) compared with the no-stimulation session (314.1 ± 57.5 N). In conclusion, external focus increased force, likely due to reduced co-activation. Stimulating the corticospinal pathway may confound attentional focus. The stimulations may distract participants from the cues and/or disrupt areas of the cortex responsible for attention and focus. MDPI 2020-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7016702/ /pubmed/31936030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010033 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wiseman, Shawn
Alizadeh, Shahab
Halperin, Israel
Lahouti, Behzad
Snow, Nicholas J.
Power, Kevin E.
Button, Duane C.
Neuromuscular Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Force Production during an Attentional Focus Task
title Neuromuscular Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Force Production during an Attentional Focus Task
title_full Neuromuscular Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Force Production during an Attentional Focus Task
title_fullStr Neuromuscular Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Force Production during an Attentional Focus Task
title_full_unstemmed Neuromuscular Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Force Production during an Attentional Focus Task
title_short Neuromuscular Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Force Production during an Attentional Focus Task
title_sort neuromuscular mechanisms underlying changes in force production during an attentional focus task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31936030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010033
work_keys_str_mv AT wisemanshawn neuromuscularmechanismsunderlyingchangesinforceproductionduringanattentionalfocustask
AT alizadehshahab neuromuscularmechanismsunderlyingchangesinforceproductionduringanattentionalfocustask
AT halperinisrael neuromuscularmechanismsunderlyingchangesinforceproductionduringanattentionalfocustask
AT lahoutibehzad neuromuscularmechanismsunderlyingchangesinforceproductionduringanattentionalfocustask
AT snownicholasj neuromuscularmechanismsunderlyingchangesinforceproductionduringanattentionalfocustask
AT powerkevine neuromuscularmechanismsunderlyingchangesinforceproductionduringanattentionalfocustask
AT buttonduanec neuromuscularmechanismsunderlyingchangesinforceproductionduringanattentionalfocustask