Cargando…
Temporal Limitations of the Standard Leaky Integrate and Fire Model
Itti and Koch’s Saliency Model has been used extensively to simulate fixation selection in a variety of tasks from visual search to simple reaction times. Although the Saliency Model has been tested for its spatial prediction of fixations in visual salience, it has not been well tested for their tem...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010016 |
_version_ | 1783497036359794688 |
---|---|
author | Merzon, Liya Malevich, Tatiana Zhulikov, Georgiy Krasovskaya, Sofia MacInnes, W. Joseph |
author_facet | Merzon, Liya Malevich, Tatiana Zhulikov, Georgiy Krasovskaya, Sofia MacInnes, W. Joseph |
author_sort | Merzon, Liya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Itti and Koch’s Saliency Model has been used extensively to simulate fixation selection in a variety of tasks from visual search to simple reaction times. Although the Saliency Model has been tested for its spatial prediction of fixations in visual salience, it has not been well tested for their temporal accuracy. Visual tasks, like search, invariably result in a positively skewed distribution of saccadic reaction times over large numbers of samples, yet we show that the leaky integrate and fire (LIF) neuronal model included in the classic implementation of the model tends to produce a distribution shifted to shorter fixations (in comparison with human data). Further, while parameter optimization using a genetic algorithm and Nelder–Mead method does improve the fit of the resulting distribution, it is still unable to match temporal distributions of human responses in a visual task. Analysis of times for individual images reveal that the LIF algorithm produces initial fixation durations that are fixed instead of a sample from a distribution (as in the human case). Only by aggregating responses over many input images do they result in a distribution, although the form of this distribution still depends on the input images used to create it and not on internal model variability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7016704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70167042020-02-28 Temporal Limitations of the Standard Leaky Integrate and Fire Model Merzon, Liya Malevich, Tatiana Zhulikov, Georgiy Krasovskaya, Sofia MacInnes, W. Joseph Brain Sci Article Itti and Koch’s Saliency Model has been used extensively to simulate fixation selection in a variety of tasks from visual search to simple reaction times. Although the Saliency Model has been tested for its spatial prediction of fixations in visual salience, it has not been well tested for their temporal accuracy. Visual tasks, like search, invariably result in a positively skewed distribution of saccadic reaction times over large numbers of samples, yet we show that the leaky integrate and fire (LIF) neuronal model included in the classic implementation of the model tends to produce a distribution shifted to shorter fixations (in comparison with human data). Further, while parameter optimization using a genetic algorithm and Nelder–Mead method does improve the fit of the resulting distribution, it is still unable to match temporal distributions of human responses in a visual task. Analysis of times for individual images reveal that the LIF algorithm produces initial fixation durations that are fixed instead of a sample from a distribution (as in the human case). Only by aggregating responses over many input images do they result in a distribution, although the form of this distribution still depends on the input images used to create it and not on internal model variability. MDPI 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7016704/ /pubmed/31892197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010016 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Merzon, Liya Malevich, Tatiana Zhulikov, Georgiy Krasovskaya, Sofia MacInnes, W. Joseph Temporal Limitations of the Standard Leaky Integrate and Fire Model |
title | Temporal Limitations of the Standard Leaky Integrate and Fire Model |
title_full | Temporal Limitations of the Standard Leaky Integrate and Fire Model |
title_fullStr | Temporal Limitations of the Standard Leaky Integrate and Fire Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Temporal Limitations of the Standard Leaky Integrate and Fire Model |
title_short | Temporal Limitations of the Standard Leaky Integrate and Fire Model |
title_sort | temporal limitations of the standard leaky integrate and fire model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merzonliya temporallimitationsofthestandardleakyintegrateandfiremodel AT malevichtatiana temporallimitationsofthestandardleakyintegrateandfiremodel AT zhulikovgeorgiy temporallimitationsofthestandardleakyintegrateandfiremodel AT krasovskayasofia temporallimitationsofthestandardleakyintegrateandfiremodel AT macinneswjoseph temporallimitationsofthestandardleakyintegrateandfiremodel |