Cargando…

Role of the interferons in CD64 and CD169 expressions in whole blood: Relevance in the balance between viral‐ or bacterial‐oriented immune responses

INTRODUCTION: CD64 expression increases on neutrophils during bacterial infections. Recently an increase in CD169 expression has been discovered on monocytes during viral infections. Generally, interferons α (IFNsα) and IFNsγ are key drivers of the infectious host immune response. The purpose of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourgoin, Pénélope, Biéchelé, Géraldine, Ait Belkacem, Inès, Morange, Pierre‐Emmanuel, Malergue, Fabrice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32031762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.289
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: CD64 expression increases on neutrophils during bacterial infections. Recently an increase in CD169 expression has been discovered on monocytes during viral infections. Generally, interferons α (IFNsα) and IFNsγ are key drivers of the infectious host immune response. The purpose of this study was to explore if a link exists between these IFNs and both biomarkers. METHODS: Whole blood samples from healthy volunteers were stimulated with either IFNs, interleukins, or infectious extracts, to mimic an infectious state. Expressions of CD64 and CD169 were assessed in these samples by multiple flow cytometry methods, over precise kinetics. RESULTS: The expression of CD64 was statistically higher in samples stimulated with IFNγ, and CD169 in those stimulated with IFNα (and all other type I IFNs). Surface expressions are directly induced by their respective IFNs via Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transduction pathways within 6 to 8 hours of incubation. Mixing both types of IFNs seemed to indicate that they partially inhibit each other. CONCLUSIONS: The induction of CD169 on monocytes and CD164 on neutrophils by type I and type II IFNs confirms the relevance of these markers for assessing between a viral‐ vs bacterial‐oriented immune response.