Cargando…

Comparison of Attachment and Antibacterial Activity of Covalent and Noncovalent Lysozyme-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

[Image: see text] Carbon nanotube–lysozyme (LSZ) conjugates provide an attractive combination of high strength and antimicrobial activity. However, there has not been a direct comparison of the covalent and noncovalent methods for creating them. In this work, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noor, Matthew M., Goswami, Joyanta, Davis, Virginia A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03387
_version_ 1783497084066856960
author Noor, Matthew M.
Goswami, Joyanta
Davis, Virginia A.
author_facet Noor, Matthew M.
Goswami, Joyanta
Davis, Virginia A.
author_sort Noor, Matthew M.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Carbon nanotube–lysozyme (LSZ) conjugates provide an attractive combination of high strength and antimicrobial activity. However, there has not been a direct comparison of the covalent and noncovalent methods for creating them. In this work, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) were functionalized with LSZ using both noncovalent adsorption and covalent attachment via N-ethyl-N-(3-dimethylamino-propyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride–N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC–NHS) chemistry. The amount of attached lysozyme, dispersion stability, and antimicrobial activity was compared. In addition, the mechanical properties of LSZ–SWNT in poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) composite films were investigated. Dispersions of covalently bound LSZ–SWNT had better dispersion stability. This was attributed to covalent functionalization enabling sustained SWNT dispersion at a lower LSZ/SWNT ratio. The covalently bound LSZ–SWNT also exhibited a lower initial rate of antibacterial response but were active over a longer time scale. Composite films made from LSZ–SWNT maintained similar activity as the corresponding dispersions. However, the noncovalent LSZ–SWNT films were stronger and more hydrolytically stable than those made from covalent LSZ–SWNT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7016910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70169102020-02-14 Comparison of Attachment and Antibacterial Activity of Covalent and Noncovalent Lysozyme-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Noor, Matthew M. Goswami, Joyanta Davis, Virginia A. ACS Omega [Image: see text] Carbon nanotube–lysozyme (LSZ) conjugates provide an attractive combination of high strength and antimicrobial activity. However, there has not been a direct comparison of the covalent and noncovalent methods for creating them. In this work, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) were functionalized with LSZ using both noncovalent adsorption and covalent attachment via N-ethyl-N-(3-dimethylamino-propyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride–N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC–NHS) chemistry. The amount of attached lysozyme, dispersion stability, and antimicrobial activity was compared. In addition, the mechanical properties of LSZ–SWNT in poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) composite films were investigated. Dispersions of covalently bound LSZ–SWNT had better dispersion stability. This was attributed to covalent functionalization enabling sustained SWNT dispersion at a lower LSZ/SWNT ratio. The covalently bound LSZ–SWNT also exhibited a lower initial rate of antibacterial response but were active over a longer time scale. Composite films made from LSZ–SWNT maintained similar activity as the corresponding dispersions. However, the noncovalent LSZ–SWNT films were stronger and more hydrolytically stable than those made from covalent LSZ–SWNT. American Chemical Society 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7016910/ /pubmed/32064386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03387 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Noor, Matthew M.
Goswami, Joyanta
Davis, Virginia A.
Comparison of Attachment and Antibacterial Activity of Covalent and Noncovalent Lysozyme-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
title Comparison of Attachment and Antibacterial Activity of Covalent and Noncovalent Lysozyme-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
title_full Comparison of Attachment and Antibacterial Activity of Covalent and Noncovalent Lysozyme-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
title_fullStr Comparison of Attachment and Antibacterial Activity of Covalent and Noncovalent Lysozyme-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Attachment and Antibacterial Activity of Covalent and Noncovalent Lysozyme-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
title_short Comparison of Attachment and Antibacterial Activity of Covalent and Noncovalent Lysozyme-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
title_sort comparison of attachment and antibacterial activity of covalent and noncovalent lysozyme-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7016910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03387
work_keys_str_mv AT noormatthewm comparisonofattachmentandantibacterialactivityofcovalentandnoncovalentlysozymefunctionalizedsinglewalledcarbonnanotubes
AT goswamijoyanta comparisonofattachmentandantibacterialactivityofcovalentandnoncovalentlysozymefunctionalizedsinglewalledcarbonnanotubes
AT davisvirginiaa comparisonofattachmentandantibacterialactivityofcovalentandnoncovalentlysozymefunctionalizedsinglewalledcarbonnanotubes