Cargando…

Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, “We Can Quit 2”: A systematic review protocol

Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in Ireland with almost 6,000 smokers dying each year from smoking-related diseases. Amongst younger Irish women, smoking rates are considerably higher in those from socially disadvantaged areas compared to women from affluent areas. Women from po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burke, Emma, Dobbie, Fiona, Dougall, Nadine, Adebolu Oluwaseun, Mary, Mockler, David, Vance, Joanne, O'Connell, Nicola, Darker, Catherine, Bauld, Linda, Hayes, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104776
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12901.1
_version_ 1783497145923403776
author Burke, Emma
Dobbie, Fiona
Dougall, Nadine
Adebolu Oluwaseun, Mary
Mockler, David
Vance, Joanne
O'Connell, Nicola
Darker, Catherine
Bauld, Linda
Hayes, Catherine
author_facet Burke, Emma
Dobbie, Fiona
Dougall, Nadine
Adebolu Oluwaseun, Mary
Mockler, David
Vance, Joanne
O'Connell, Nicola
Darker, Catherine
Bauld, Linda
Hayes, Catherine
author_sort Burke, Emma
collection PubMed
description Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in Ireland with almost 6,000 smokers dying each year from smoking-related diseases. Amongst younger Irish women, smoking rates are considerably higher in those from socially disadvantaged areas compared to women from affluent areas. Women from poorer areas also experience higher rates of lung cancer. To our knowledge, there are no peer reviewed published systematic reviews on the effectiveness of interventions tailored to reduce smoking rates in women from disadvantaged areas. This systematic review protocol will aim to examine the effectiveness of such interventions and to describe trial processes such as recruitment, follow-up and dropout prevention strategies, as well as barriers and enablers of successful implementation.    A systematic review will be conducted of peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials and associated process evaluations of smoking cessation interventions designed for women living in socially disadvantaged areas. If the search returns, less than five studies are review criteria will expand to include quasi-experimental studies. A number of databases of scholarly literature will be searched from inception using a detailed search strategy. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles to identify relevant studies using a pre-defined checklist based on PICOS. In the case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be consulted. The quality of included studies will be assessed using the ‘Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation’ (GRADE) criteria. Quantitative data will be extracted and, if comparable, will be assessed using meta-analysis. A narrative meta-synthesis of qualitative data will be conducted.   This review aims to synthesise information from relevant studies on smoking cessation interventions tailored for women from socially disadvantaged areas. The evidence obtained from studies and presented in this review will help guide future research in this area. Registration: This review will be registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7017191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70171912020-02-25 Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, “We Can Quit 2”: A systematic review protocol Burke, Emma Dobbie, Fiona Dougall, Nadine Adebolu Oluwaseun, Mary Mockler, David Vance, Joanne O'Connell, Nicola Darker, Catherine Bauld, Linda Hayes, Catherine HRB Open Res Systematic Review Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in Ireland with almost 6,000 smokers dying each year from smoking-related diseases. Amongst younger Irish women, smoking rates are considerably higher in those from socially disadvantaged areas compared to women from affluent areas. Women from poorer areas also experience higher rates of lung cancer. To our knowledge, there are no peer reviewed published systematic reviews on the effectiveness of interventions tailored to reduce smoking rates in women from disadvantaged areas. This systematic review protocol will aim to examine the effectiveness of such interventions and to describe trial processes such as recruitment, follow-up and dropout prevention strategies, as well as barriers and enablers of successful implementation.    A systematic review will be conducted of peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials and associated process evaluations of smoking cessation interventions designed for women living in socially disadvantaged areas. If the search returns, less than five studies are review criteria will expand to include quasi-experimental studies. A number of databases of scholarly literature will be searched from inception using a detailed search strategy. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles to identify relevant studies using a pre-defined checklist based on PICOS. In the case of disagreement, a third reviewer will be consulted. The quality of included studies will be assessed using the ‘Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation’ (GRADE) criteria. Quantitative data will be extracted and, if comparable, will be assessed using meta-analysis. A narrative meta-synthesis of qualitative data will be conducted.   This review aims to synthesise information from relevant studies on smoking cessation interventions tailored for women from socially disadvantaged areas. The evidence obtained from studies and presented in this review will help guide future research in this area. Registration: This review will be registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). F1000 Research Limited 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7017191/ /pubmed/32104776 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12901.1 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Burke E et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Burke, Emma
Dobbie, Fiona
Dougall, Nadine
Adebolu Oluwaseun, Mary
Mockler, David
Vance, Joanne
O'Connell, Nicola
Darker, Catherine
Bauld, Linda
Hayes, Catherine
Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, “We Can Quit 2”: A systematic review protocol
title Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, “We Can Quit 2”: A systematic review protocol
title_full Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, “We Can Quit 2”: A systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, “We Can Quit 2”: A systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, “We Can Quit 2”: A systematic review protocol
title_short Smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, “We Can Quit 2”: A systematic review protocol
title_sort smoking cessation programmes for women living in disadvantaged communities, “we can quit 2”: a systematic review protocol
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104776
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12901.1
work_keys_str_mv AT burkeemma smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol
AT dobbiefiona smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol
AT dougallnadine smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol
AT adeboluoluwaseunmary smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol
AT mocklerdavid smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol
AT vancejoanne smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol
AT oconnellnicola smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol
AT darkercatherine smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol
AT bauldlinda smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol
AT hayescatherine smokingcessationprogrammesforwomenlivingindisadvantagedcommunitieswecanquit2asystematicreviewprotocol