Cargando…
Synthesis of Dimethyl Ether via CO(2) Hydrogenation: Effect of the Drying Technique of Alumina on Properties and Performance of Alumina-Supported Copper Catalysts
[Image: see text] Thermal treatment during catalyst preparation is one of the important factors affecting the characteristics and performance of a catalyst. To improve the catalytic performance of an alumina-supported copper catalyst prepared by an impregnation method for dimethyl ether (DME) synthe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03713 |
Sumario: | [Image: see text] Thermal treatment during catalyst preparation is one of the important factors affecting the characteristics and performance of a catalyst. To improve the catalytic performance of an alumina-supported copper catalyst prepared by an impregnation method for dimethyl ether (DME) synthesis from CO(2), the effects of the use of hot air and infrared drying as well as calcination at 600 and 900 °C to prepare alumina supports were investigated. Infrared drying could shorten the required drying time by 75% when compared with hot air drying. Infrared drying could also help maintain the pore size and pore volume of the supports, leading to their larger surface areas. Different drying techniques were additionally noted to result in different sizes and shapes of the pores as well as to different copper distributions and intensities of acid sites of the catalyst. An increase in the calcination temperature resulted in a decrease in the surface area of the supports because of particle aggregation. The drying technique exhibited a more significant effect than calcination temperature on the space-time yield of DME. A catalyst utilizing the support prepared by infrared drying and then calcined at 600 °C exhibited the highest yield of DME (40.9 g(DME) kg(cat)(–1) h(–1)) at a reaction temperature of 300 °C. Stability of the optimal catalyst, when monitored over a 24 h period, was noted to be excellent. |
---|