Cargando…

Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment

BACKGROUND: Smaller portions may help to reduce energy intake. However, there may be a limit to the magnitude of the portion size reduction that can be made before consumers respond by increasing intake of other food immediately or at later meals. We tested the theoretical prediction that reductions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haynes, Ashleigh, Hardman, Charlotte A., Halford, Jason C. G., Jebb, Susan A., Mead, Bethan R., Robinson, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-0920-4
_version_ 1783497220620812288
author Haynes, Ashleigh
Hardman, Charlotte A.
Halford, Jason C. G.
Jebb, Susan A.
Mead, Bethan R.
Robinson, Eric
author_facet Haynes, Ashleigh
Hardman, Charlotte A.
Halford, Jason C. G.
Jebb, Susan A.
Mead, Bethan R.
Robinson, Eric
author_sort Haynes, Ashleigh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smaller portions may help to reduce energy intake. However, there may be a limit to the magnitude of the portion size reduction that can be made before consumers respond by increasing intake of other food immediately or at later meals. We tested the theoretical prediction that reductions to portion size would result in a significant reduction to daily energy intake when the resulting portion was visually perceived as ‘normal’ in size, but that a reduction resulting in a ‘smaller than normal’ portion size would cause immediate or later additional eating. METHODS: Over three 5-day periods, daily energy intake was measured in a controlled laboratory study using a randomized crossover design (N = 30). The served portion size of the main meal component of lunch and dinner was manipulated in three conditions: ‘large-normal’ (747 kcal), ‘small-normal’ (543 kcal), and ‘smaller than normal’ (339 kcal). Perceived ‘normality’ of portion sizes was determined by two pilot studies. Ad libitum daily energy intake from all meals and snacks was measured. RESULTS: Daily energy intake in the ‘large-normal’ condition was 2543 kcals. Daily energy intake was significantly lower in the ‘small-normal’ portion size condition (mean difference − 95 kcal/d, 95% CI [− 184, − 6], p = .04); and was also significantly lower in the ‘smaller than normal’ than the ‘small-normal’ condition (mean difference − 210 kcal/d, 95% CI [− 309, − 111], p < .001). Contrary to predictions, there was no evidence that the degree of additional food consumption observed was greater when portions were reduced past the point of appearing normal in size. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions to the portion size of main-meal foods resulted in significant decreases in daily energy intake. Additional food consumption did not offset this effect, even when portions were reduced to the point that they were no longer perceived as being normal in size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered protocol and analysis plan: https://osf.io/natws/; retrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03811210.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7017560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70175602020-02-20 Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment Haynes, Ashleigh Hardman, Charlotte A. Halford, Jason C. G. Jebb, Susan A. Mead, Bethan R. Robinson, Eric Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Smaller portions may help to reduce energy intake. However, there may be a limit to the magnitude of the portion size reduction that can be made before consumers respond by increasing intake of other food immediately or at later meals. We tested the theoretical prediction that reductions to portion size would result in a significant reduction to daily energy intake when the resulting portion was visually perceived as ‘normal’ in size, but that a reduction resulting in a ‘smaller than normal’ portion size would cause immediate or later additional eating. METHODS: Over three 5-day periods, daily energy intake was measured in a controlled laboratory study using a randomized crossover design (N = 30). The served portion size of the main meal component of lunch and dinner was manipulated in three conditions: ‘large-normal’ (747 kcal), ‘small-normal’ (543 kcal), and ‘smaller than normal’ (339 kcal). Perceived ‘normality’ of portion sizes was determined by two pilot studies. Ad libitum daily energy intake from all meals and snacks was measured. RESULTS: Daily energy intake in the ‘large-normal’ condition was 2543 kcals. Daily energy intake was significantly lower in the ‘small-normal’ portion size condition (mean difference − 95 kcal/d, 95% CI [− 184, − 6], p = .04); and was also significantly lower in the ‘smaller than normal’ than the ‘small-normal’ condition (mean difference − 210 kcal/d, 95% CI [− 309, − 111], p < .001). Contrary to predictions, there was no evidence that the degree of additional food consumption observed was greater when portions were reduced past the point of appearing normal in size. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions to the portion size of main-meal foods resulted in significant decreases in daily energy intake. Additional food consumption did not offset this effect, even when portions were reduced to the point that they were no longer perceived as being normal in size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered protocol and analysis plan: https://osf.io/natws/; retrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03811210. BioMed Central 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7017560/ /pubmed/32050979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-0920-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Haynes, Ashleigh
Hardman, Charlotte A.
Halford, Jason C. G.
Jebb, Susan A.
Mead, Bethan R.
Robinson, Eric
Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment
title Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment
title_full Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment
title_fullStr Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment
title_full_unstemmed Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment
title_short Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment
title_sort reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32050979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-0920-4
work_keys_str_mv AT haynesashleigh reductionstomainmealportionsizesreducedailyenergyintakeregardlessofperceivednormalityofportionsizea5daycrossoverlaboratoryexperiment
AT hardmancharlottea reductionstomainmealportionsizesreducedailyenergyintakeregardlessofperceivednormalityofportionsizea5daycrossoverlaboratoryexperiment
AT halfordjasoncg reductionstomainmealportionsizesreducedailyenergyintakeregardlessofperceivednormalityofportionsizea5daycrossoverlaboratoryexperiment
AT jebbsusana reductionstomainmealportionsizesreducedailyenergyintakeregardlessofperceivednormalityofportionsizea5daycrossoverlaboratoryexperiment
AT meadbethanr reductionstomainmealportionsizesreducedailyenergyintakeregardlessofperceivednormalityofportionsizea5daycrossoverlaboratoryexperiment
AT robinsoneric reductionstomainmealportionsizesreducedailyenergyintakeregardlessofperceivednormalityofportionsizea5daycrossoverlaboratoryexperiment