Cargando…

A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel(®) and ProSeal(™) LMA in children

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Supraglottic airways (SGAs) should have good oropharyngeal seal pressures (OSP) for adequate ventilation and prevention of aspiration. Our aim was to study the effect of lateral position on OSP and thereby on ventilatory parameters for i-gel(®) and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thakur, Deepali P, Malde, Anila D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32139930
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_635_19
_version_ 1783497239505666048
author Thakur, Deepali P
Malde, Anila D
author_facet Thakur, Deepali P
Malde, Anila D
author_sort Thakur, Deepali P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Supraglottic airways (SGAs) should have good oropharyngeal seal pressures (OSP) for adequate ventilation and prevention of aspiration. Our aim was to study the effect of lateral position on OSP and thereby on ventilatory parameters for i-gel(®) and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in children. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 86 children of ASA I-II, aged 1 month to 12 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia using i-gel(®) or PLMA and requiring lateral position either for surgery or regional blocks were included. In both supine and lateral position OSP (constant flow method), expired tidal volume, fractional volume loss (%), and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)) were noted. Intragroup and intergroup difference in OSP from supine to lateral position was analyzed using paired and unpaired t-test respectively. RESULTS: In lateral position, there was a significant decrease in the OSP (cm H(2)O) in both i-gel(®) (supine: 21.94 ± 5.82, lateral: 15.54 ± 5.37) and PLMA (supine: 17.53 ± 5.05, lateral: 12.76 ± 3.37) groups (P = 0.000). Percentage reduction in OSP from supine to lateral with i-gel(®) (28.14 ± 18.86) and PLMA (24.06 ± 19.75) were comparable (P = 0.339). With both i-gel(®) and PLMA significant increase in fractional volume loss and ETCO(2) were noted in lateral position. I-gel(®) group had higher OSP compared to PLMA in supine (P = 0.001) and lateral position (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: In lateral position there was significant reduction in OSP compared to supine position with both i-gel(®) and PLMA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7017671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70176712020-03-05 A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel(®) and ProSeal(™) LMA in children Thakur, Deepali P Malde, Anila D Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Supraglottic airways (SGAs) should have good oropharyngeal seal pressures (OSP) for adequate ventilation and prevention of aspiration. Our aim was to study the effect of lateral position on OSP and thereby on ventilatory parameters for i-gel(®) and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in children. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 86 children of ASA I-II, aged 1 month to 12 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia using i-gel(®) or PLMA and requiring lateral position either for surgery or regional blocks were included. In both supine and lateral position OSP (constant flow method), expired tidal volume, fractional volume loss (%), and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)) were noted. Intragroup and intergroup difference in OSP from supine to lateral position was analyzed using paired and unpaired t-test respectively. RESULTS: In lateral position, there was a significant decrease in the OSP (cm H(2)O) in both i-gel(®) (supine: 21.94 ± 5.82, lateral: 15.54 ± 5.37) and PLMA (supine: 17.53 ± 5.05, lateral: 12.76 ± 3.37) groups (P = 0.000). Percentage reduction in OSP from supine to lateral with i-gel(®) (28.14 ± 18.86) and PLMA (24.06 ± 19.75) were comparable (P = 0.339). With both i-gel(®) and PLMA significant increase in fractional volume loss and ETCO(2) were noted in lateral position. I-gel(®) group had higher OSP compared to PLMA in supine (P = 0.001) and lateral position (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: In lateral position there was significant reduction in OSP compared to supine position with both i-gel(®) and PLMA. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-02 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7017671/ /pubmed/32139930 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_635_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Thakur, Deepali P
Malde, Anila D
A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel(®) and ProSeal(™) LMA in children
title A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel(®) and ProSeal(™) LMA in children
title_full A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel(®) and ProSeal(™) LMA in children
title_fullStr A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel(®) and ProSeal(™) LMA in children
title_full_unstemmed A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel(®) and ProSeal(™) LMA in children
title_short A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel(®) and ProSeal(™) LMA in children
title_sort study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel(®) and proseal(™) lma in children
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32139930
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_635_19
work_keys_str_mv AT thakurdeepalip astudyofeffectoflateralpositiononoropharyngealsealpressureofigelandproseallmainchildren
AT maldeanilad astudyofeffectoflateralpositiononoropharyngealsealpressureofigelandproseallmainchildren
AT thakurdeepalip studyofeffectoflateralpositiononoropharyngealsealpressureofigelandproseallmainchildren
AT maldeanilad studyofeffectoflateralpositiononoropharyngealsealpressureofigelandproseallmainchildren