Cargando…

Comparison of lipid accumulation product and body mass index as indicators of diabetes diagnosis among 215,651 Chinese adults

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess if lipid accumulation product (LAP) could outperform body mass index (BMI) as a marker for diabetes diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed the results of a national physical examination project in Urumqi, China. This project was conducted in 442 community clinics in Urumqi from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Tian, Pei, Hualian, Chen, Zhen, Hailili, Gulisiya, Wang, Shuxia, Sun, Yong, Yao, Hua, Jianghong, Dai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095339
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8483
_version_ 1783497253211602944
author Tian, Tian
Pei, Hualian
Chen, Zhen
Hailili, Gulisiya
Wang, Shuxia
Sun, Yong
Yao, Hua
Jianghong, Dai
author_facet Tian, Tian
Pei, Hualian
Chen, Zhen
Hailili, Gulisiya
Wang, Shuxia
Sun, Yong
Yao, Hua
Jianghong, Dai
author_sort Tian, Tian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We aimed to assess if lipid accumulation product (LAP) could outperform body mass index (BMI) as a marker for diabetes diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed the results of a national physical examination project in Urumqi, China. This project was conducted in 442 community clinics in Urumqi from October 2016 to February 2017. RESULTS: LAP was highly correlated with diabetes. The subjects with higher amounts of LAP had a higher risk of diabetes, and the prevalence of diabetes in the fourth quartile of LAP was dramatically higher than in the first quartile (5.72% vs. 21.76%). The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) associated with diabetes in the fourth quartile of LAP was significantly higher than the AOR associated with diabetes in the first quartile, and when BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2) was compared with BMI < 28 kg/m(2) (3.24 (3.11, 3.37) vs. 1.65 (1.60, 1.70)). The LAP’s area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher than the BMI’s AUC when based on diabetes (0.655 vs. 0.604). In the normal BMI group, 34% of participants had a LAP value higher than the cutoff point found during ROC analysis. In this subgroup, we observed a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes that was similar to that of the subgroup with a BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2), and both of their LAP values were higher than the cutoff point. CONCLUSION: When use as a tool for diabetes diagnosis, LAP performed better than BMI, implying that LAP could be a preferable anthropometry assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7017788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70177882020-02-24 Comparison of lipid accumulation product and body mass index as indicators of diabetes diagnosis among 215,651 Chinese adults Tian, Tian Pei, Hualian Chen, Zhen Hailili, Gulisiya Wang, Shuxia Sun, Yong Yao, Hua Jianghong, Dai PeerJ Epidemiology PURPOSE: We aimed to assess if lipid accumulation product (LAP) could outperform body mass index (BMI) as a marker for diabetes diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed the results of a national physical examination project in Urumqi, China. This project was conducted in 442 community clinics in Urumqi from October 2016 to February 2017. RESULTS: LAP was highly correlated with diabetes. The subjects with higher amounts of LAP had a higher risk of diabetes, and the prevalence of diabetes in the fourth quartile of LAP was dramatically higher than in the first quartile (5.72% vs. 21.76%). The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) associated with diabetes in the fourth quartile of LAP was significantly higher than the AOR associated with diabetes in the first quartile, and when BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2) was compared with BMI < 28 kg/m(2) (3.24 (3.11, 3.37) vs. 1.65 (1.60, 1.70)). The LAP’s area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher than the BMI’s AUC when based on diabetes (0.655 vs. 0.604). In the normal BMI group, 34% of participants had a LAP value higher than the cutoff point found during ROC analysis. In this subgroup, we observed a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes that was similar to that of the subgroup with a BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2), and both of their LAP values were higher than the cutoff point. CONCLUSION: When use as a tool for diabetes diagnosis, LAP performed better than BMI, implying that LAP could be a preferable anthropometry assessment. PeerJ Inc. 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7017788/ /pubmed/32095339 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8483 Text en © 2020 Tian et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Tian, Tian
Pei, Hualian
Chen, Zhen
Hailili, Gulisiya
Wang, Shuxia
Sun, Yong
Yao, Hua
Jianghong, Dai
Comparison of lipid accumulation product and body mass index as indicators of diabetes diagnosis among 215,651 Chinese adults
title Comparison of lipid accumulation product and body mass index as indicators of diabetes diagnosis among 215,651 Chinese adults
title_full Comparison of lipid accumulation product and body mass index as indicators of diabetes diagnosis among 215,651 Chinese adults
title_fullStr Comparison of lipid accumulation product and body mass index as indicators of diabetes diagnosis among 215,651 Chinese adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of lipid accumulation product and body mass index as indicators of diabetes diagnosis among 215,651 Chinese adults
title_short Comparison of lipid accumulation product and body mass index as indicators of diabetes diagnosis among 215,651 Chinese adults
title_sort comparison of lipid accumulation product and body mass index as indicators of diabetes diagnosis among 215,651 chinese adults
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095339
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8483
work_keys_str_mv AT tiantian comparisonoflipidaccumulationproductandbodymassindexasindicatorsofdiabetesdiagnosisamong215651chineseadults
AT peihualian comparisonoflipidaccumulationproductandbodymassindexasindicatorsofdiabetesdiagnosisamong215651chineseadults
AT chenzhen comparisonoflipidaccumulationproductandbodymassindexasindicatorsofdiabetesdiagnosisamong215651chineseadults
AT haililigulisiya comparisonoflipidaccumulationproductandbodymassindexasindicatorsofdiabetesdiagnosisamong215651chineseadults
AT wangshuxia comparisonoflipidaccumulationproductandbodymassindexasindicatorsofdiabetesdiagnosisamong215651chineseadults
AT sunyong comparisonoflipidaccumulationproductandbodymassindexasindicatorsofdiabetesdiagnosisamong215651chineseadults
AT yaohua comparisonoflipidaccumulationproductandbodymassindexasindicatorsofdiabetesdiagnosisamong215651chineseadults
AT jianghongdai comparisonoflipidaccumulationproductandbodymassindexasindicatorsofdiabetesdiagnosisamong215651chineseadults