Cargando…

What is the Optimum Pattern of Pressurisation to Gain Maximum Penetration of Methylmethacrylate Cement into the Reamed Acetabulum?

Introduction The cemented polyethylene cup has remained the standard acetabular implant for 50 years although there has been little research into cementing techniques. In the past, cement was previously inserted by sequential manual pressurisation (thumbing) but this technique was prone to contamina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocos, Brett, Whitehouse, Michael R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082954
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6654
_version_ 1783497271552245760
author Rocos, Brett
Whitehouse, Michael R
author_facet Rocos, Brett
Whitehouse, Michael R
author_sort Rocos, Brett
collection PubMed
description Introduction The cemented polyethylene cup has remained the standard acetabular implant for 50 years although there has been little research into cementing techniques. In the past, cement was previously inserted by sequential manual pressurisation (thumbing) but this technique was prone to contamination of the cement leading to weakening of fixation. In recent times, third-generation techniques using sealed pressurisation with rim preparation have been espoused with similar results. We were interested in establishing whether repeated cycles of compression of cement allowing adequate time for relaxation increases its depth of penetration, and the optimum period of relaxation required to achieve this goal. Method A single mix of polymethylmethacrylate cement at dough stage was inserted into a model of the reamed acetabulum. Cyclical pressurisation of the cement with 50 N followed nine different patterns to simulate thumbing, constant pressure, and the application of a sealed and unsealed acetabular cup implant. Results A constant load was as effective as all variations of repeated cycles of load and relaxation except for 50 N pressure applied for four seconds with four second intervals. A four second interval of relaxation achieved significantly more penetration than five or three seconds. Following two minutes of constant pressure, the application of a sealed or unsealed thrust of the plunger had no effect on cement penetration. Conclusion This study suggests that optimal polymethylmethacrylate cement penetration into the acetabulum occurs with cycled application of load for four seconds followed by four seconds of relaxation. The subsequent pressurisation with either a flanged or unflanged acetabular implant does not appear to improve cement penetration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7017929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70179292020-02-20 What is the Optimum Pattern of Pressurisation to Gain Maximum Penetration of Methylmethacrylate Cement into the Reamed Acetabulum? Rocos, Brett Whitehouse, Michael R Cureus Orthopedics Introduction The cemented polyethylene cup has remained the standard acetabular implant for 50 years although there has been little research into cementing techniques. In the past, cement was previously inserted by sequential manual pressurisation (thumbing) but this technique was prone to contamination of the cement leading to weakening of fixation. In recent times, third-generation techniques using sealed pressurisation with rim preparation have been espoused with similar results. We were interested in establishing whether repeated cycles of compression of cement allowing adequate time for relaxation increases its depth of penetration, and the optimum period of relaxation required to achieve this goal. Method A single mix of polymethylmethacrylate cement at dough stage was inserted into a model of the reamed acetabulum. Cyclical pressurisation of the cement with 50 N followed nine different patterns to simulate thumbing, constant pressure, and the application of a sealed and unsealed acetabular cup implant. Results A constant load was as effective as all variations of repeated cycles of load and relaxation except for 50 N pressure applied for four seconds with four second intervals. A four second interval of relaxation achieved significantly more penetration than five or three seconds. Following two minutes of constant pressure, the application of a sealed or unsealed thrust of the plunger had no effect on cement penetration. Conclusion This study suggests that optimal polymethylmethacrylate cement penetration into the acetabulum occurs with cycled application of load for four seconds followed by four seconds of relaxation. The subsequent pressurisation with either a flanged or unflanged acetabular implant does not appear to improve cement penetration. Cureus 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7017929/ /pubmed/32082954 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6654 Text en Copyright © 2020, Rocos et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Rocos, Brett
Whitehouse, Michael R
What is the Optimum Pattern of Pressurisation to Gain Maximum Penetration of Methylmethacrylate Cement into the Reamed Acetabulum?
title What is the Optimum Pattern of Pressurisation to Gain Maximum Penetration of Methylmethacrylate Cement into the Reamed Acetabulum?
title_full What is the Optimum Pattern of Pressurisation to Gain Maximum Penetration of Methylmethacrylate Cement into the Reamed Acetabulum?
title_fullStr What is the Optimum Pattern of Pressurisation to Gain Maximum Penetration of Methylmethacrylate Cement into the Reamed Acetabulum?
title_full_unstemmed What is the Optimum Pattern of Pressurisation to Gain Maximum Penetration of Methylmethacrylate Cement into the Reamed Acetabulum?
title_short What is the Optimum Pattern of Pressurisation to Gain Maximum Penetration of Methylmethacrylate Cement into the Reamed Acetabulum?
title_sort what is the optimum pattern of pressurisation to gain maximum penetration of methylmethacrylate cement into the reamed acetabulum?
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082954
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6654
work_keys_str_mv AT rocosbrett whatistheoptimumpatternofpressurisationtogainmaximumpenetrationofmethylmethacrylatecementintothereamedacetabulum
AT whitehousemichaelr whatistheoptimumpatternofpressurisationtogainmaximumpenetrationofmethylmethacrylatecementintothereamedacetabulum