Cargando…

Cognitively unimpaired adults’ reactions to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results

IMPORTANCE: Clinical guidelines currently recommend against amyloid imaging for cognitively unimpaired persons. The goal of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) prevention, together with advances in understanding the pathophysiology of AD, however, has led to trials testing drugs in cognitively unimpaired perso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Largent, Emily A., Harkins, Kristin, van Dyck, Christopher H., Hachey, Sara, Sankar, Pamela, Karlawish, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229137
_version_ 1783497295430418432
author Largent, Emily A.
Harkins, Kristin
van Dyck, Christopher H.
Hachey, Sara
Sankar, Pamela
Karlawish, Jason
author_facet Largent, Emily A.
Harkins, Kristin
van Dyck, Christopher H.
Hachey, Sara
Sankar, Pamela
Karlawish, Jason
author_sort Largent, Emily A.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Clinical guidelines currently recommend against amyloid imaging for cognitively unimpaired persons. The goal of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) prevention, together with advances in understanding the pathophysiology of AD, however, has led to trials testing drugs in cognitively unimpaired persons who show evidence of AD biomarkers. Assuming the eventual success of such trials, millions of patients will be affected. There is a need to understand the effects of biomarker disclosure on those individuals. DESIGN: The Study of Knowledge and Reactions to Amyloid Testing (SOKRATES) involved 2 semi-structured telephone interviews with individuals who received amyloid PET scan results as part of screening for research participation. Post-disclosure interviews were conducted at 4 to 12 weeks and again 1 year later. Data were collected from November 5, 2014 to November 30, 2016. Interviews were transcribed and coded in NVivo 12.0. PARTICIPANTS: 80 adults aged 65 and older: 50 who received “elevated” and 30 who received “not-elevated” amyloid PET scan results. MAIN OUTCOMES: Interviews examined four domains: (1) comprehension of the amyloid PET scan result; (2) implications of the result for sense of self, memory, and future; (3) sharing of results with others; and (4) AD risk-reduction behaviors. RESULTS: Participants who received an elevated amyloid PET scan result viewed the result as more serious and sensitive than other medical test results given its unique implications for identity, self-determination, and stigma. In contrast, participants who received a not-elevated amyloid PET scan result described feeling relief and reinterpreted perceived memory impairments as normal aging. Participants with elevated amyloid reported contemplating and making more changes to health behaviors and future plans than their peers with not-elevated amyloid. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of persons with preclinical AD, a stage of the disease defined by the presence of biomarkers in the absence of cognitive impairment, will need to address matters of identity, stigma, and life-planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7018056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70180562020-02-26 Cognitively unimpaired adults’ reactions to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results Largent, Emily A. Harkins, Kristin van Dyck, Christopher H. Hachey, Sara Sankar, Pamela Karlawish, Jason PLoS One Research Article IMPORTANCE: Clinical guidelines currently recommend against amyloid imaging for cognitively unimpaired persons. The goal of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) prevention, together with advances in understanding the pathophysiology of AD, however, has led to trials testing drugs in cognitively unimpaired persons who show evidence of AD biomarkers. Assuming the eventual success of such trials, millions of patients will be affected. There is a need to understand the effects of biomarker disclosure on those individuals. DESIGN: The Study of Knowledge and Reactions to Amyloid Testing (SOKRATES) involved 2 semi-structured telephone interviews with individuals who received amyloid PET scan results as part of screening for research participation. Post-disclosure interviews were conducted at 4 to 12 weeks and again 1 year later. Data were collected from November 5, 2014 to November 30, 2016. Interviews were transcribed and coded in NVivo 12.0. PARTICIPANTS: 80 adults aged 65 and older: 50 who received “elevated” and 30 who received “not-elevated” amyloid PET scan results. MAIN OUTCOMES: Interviews examined four domains: (1) comprehension of the amyloid PET scan result; (2) implications of the result for sense of self, memory, and future; (3) sharing of results with others; and (4) AD risk-reduction behaviors. RESULTS: Participants who received an elevated amyloid PET scan result viewed the result as more serious and sensitive than other medical test results given its unique implications for identity, self-determination, and stigma. In contrast, participants who received a not-elevated amyloid PET scan result described feeling relief and reinterpreted perceived memory impairments as normal aging. Participants with elevated amyloid reported contemplating and making more changes to health behaviors and future plans than their peers with not-elevated amyloid. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of persons with preclinical AD, a stage of the disease defined by the presence of biomarkers in the absence of cognitive impairment, will need to address matters of identity, stigma, and life-planning. Public Library of Science 2020-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7018056/ /pubmed/32053667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229137 Text en © 2020 Largent et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Largent, Emily A.
Harkins, Kristin
van Dyck, Christopher H.
Hachey, Sara
Sankar, Pamela
Karlawish, Jason
Cognitively unimpaired adults’ reactions to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results
title Cognitively unimpaired adults’ reactions to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results
title_full Cognitively unimpaired adults’ reactions to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results
title_fullStr Cognitively unimpaired adults’ reactions to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results
title_full_unstemmed Cognitively unimpaired adults’ reactions to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results
title_short Cognitively unimpaired adults’ reactions to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results
title_sort cognitively unimpaired adults’ reactions to disclosure of amyloid pet scan results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229137
work_keys_str_mv AT largentemilya cognitivelyunimpairedadultsreactionstodisclosureofamyloidpetscanresults
AT harkinskristin cognitivelyunimpairedadultsreactionstodisclosureofamyloidpetscanresults
AT vandyckchristopherh cognitivelyunimpairedadultsreactionstodisclosureofamyloidpetscanresults
AT hacheysara cognitivelyunimpairedadultsreactionstodisclosureofamyloidpetscanresults
AT sankarpamela cognitivelyunimpairedadultsreactionstodisclosureofamyloidpetscanresults
AT karlawishjason cognitivelyunimpairedadultsreactionstodisclosureofamyloidpetscanresults