Cargando…

Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states

The limited capacity of recent memory inevitably leads to partial memory of past stimuli. There is also evidence that behavioral and neural responses to novel or rare stimuli are dependent on one’s memory of past stimuli. Thus, these responses may serve as a probe of different individuals’ rememberi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levi-Aharoni, Hadar, Shriki, Oren, Tishby, Naftali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007065
_version_ 1783497305334218752
author Levi-Aharoni, Hadar
Shriki, Oren
Tishby, Naftali
author_facet Levi-Aharoni, Hadar
Shriki, Oren
Tishby, Naftali
author_sort Levi-Aharoni, Hadar
collection PubMed
description The limited capacity of recent memory inevitably leads to partial memory of past stimuli. There is also evidence that behavioral and neural responses to novel or rare stimuli are dependent on one’s memory of past stimuli. Thus, these responses may serve as a probe of different individuals’ remembering and forgetting characteristics. Here, we utilize two lossy compression models of stimulus sequences that inherently involve forgetting, which in addition to being a necessity under many conditions, also has theoretical and behavioral advantages. One model is based on a simple stimulus counter and the other on the Information Bottleneck (IB) framework which suggests a more general, theoretically justifiable principle for biological and cognitive phenomena. These models are applied to analyze a novelty-detection event-related potential commonly known as the P300. The trial-by-trial variations of the P300 response, recorded in an auditory oddball paradigm, were subjected to each model to extract two stimulus-compression parameters for each subject: memory length and representation accuracy. These parameters were then utilized to estimate the subjects’ recent memory capacity limit under the task conditions. The results, along with recently published findings on single neurons and the IB model, underscore how a lossy compression framework can be utilized to account for trial-by-trial variability of neural responses at different spatial scales and in different individuals, while at the same time providing estimates of individual memory characteristics at different levels of representation using a theoretically-based parsimonious model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7018098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70180982020-02-26 Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states Levi-Aharoni, Hadar Shriki, Oren Tishby, Naftali PLoS Comput Biol Research Article The limited capacity of recent memory inevitably leads to partial memory of past stimuli. There is also evidence that behavioral and neural responses to novel or rare stimuli are dependent on one’s memory of past stimuli. Thus, these responses may serve as a probe of different individuals’ remembering and forgetting characteristics. Here, we utilize two lossy compression models of stimulus sequences that inherently involve forgetting, which in addition to being a necessity under many conditions, also has theoretical and behavioral advantages. One model is based on a simple stimulus counter and the other on the Information Bottleneck (IB) framework which suggests a more general, theoretically justifiable principle for biological and cognitive phenomena. These models are applied to analyze a novelty-detection event-related potential commonly known as the P300. The trial-by-trial variations of the P300 response, recorded in an auditory oddball paradigm, were subjected to each model to extract two stimulus-compression parameters for each subject: memory length and representation accuracy. These parameters were then utilized to estimate the subjects’ recent memory capacity limit under the task conditions. The results, along with recently published findings on single neurons and the IB model, underscore how a lossy compression framework can be utilized to account for trial-by-trial variability of neural responses at different spatial scales and in different individuals, while at the same time providing estimates of individual memory characteristics at different levels of representation using a theoretically-based parsimonious model. Public Library of Science 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7018098/ /pubmed/32012146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007065 Text en © 2020 Levi-Aharoni et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Levi-Aharoni, Hadar
Shriki, Oren
Tishby, Naftali
Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states
title Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states
title_full Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states
title_fullStr Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states
title_full_unstemmed Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states
title_short Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states
title_sort surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007065
work_keys_str_mv AT leviaharonihadar surpriseresponseasaprobeforcompressedmemorystates
AT shrikioren surpriseresponseasaprobeforcompressedmemorystates
AT tishbynaftali surpriseresponseasaprobeforcompressedmemorystates