Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity Questionnaire

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to determine validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS-T) Questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The translation and back translation steps of the study were based on the Beaton guidelines. Sixty-eight pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: TÖRE, Nurten Gizem, GÜMÜŞSOY, Mesken, OSKAY, Deran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1808-170
_version_ 1783497324900646912
author TÖRE, Nurten Gizem
GÜMÜŞSOY, Mesken
OSKAY, Deran
author_facet TÖRE, Nurten Gizem
GÜMÜŞSOY, Mesken
OSKAY, Deran
author_sort TÖRE, Nurten Gizem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to determine validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS-T) Questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The translation and back translation steps of the study were based on the Beaton guidelines. Sixty-eight patients between 18 and 65 years old with cold intolerance after amputation, replantation, multiple crush syndrome, and peripheral nerve injury were included in the study. Patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), the SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the single questions assessing the cold sensitivity and cold intolerance once and the final version of the CISS-T twice with a 7-day interval. RESULTS: The internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.844) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.938) of CISS-T were assessed and both were considerably high. Also, the correlations between the scores of the CISS-T, DASH-T, SF-36-T, and the single questions were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The CISS-T showed an excellent correlation with the single questions (rho = 0.8 and 0.877), a good and negative correlation with the pain subscale of the SF-36 (rho = 0.617), and a moderate correlation with the DASH-T (rho = 0.592). CONCLUSION: As a result, the CISS-T is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the severity of cold intolerance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7018297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70182972020-03-23 Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity Questionnaire TÖRE, Nurten Gizem GÜMÜŞSOY, Mesken OSKAY, Deran Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to determine validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS-T) Questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The translation and back translation steps of the study were based on the Beaton guidelines. Sixty-eight patients between 18 and 65 years old with cold intolerance after amputation, replantation, multiple crush syndrome, and peripheral nerve injury were included in the study. Patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), the SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the single questions assessing the cold sensitivity and cold intolerance once and the final version of the CISS-T twice with a 7-day interval. RESULTS: The internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.844) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.938) of CISS-T were assessed and both were considerably high. Also, the correlations between the scores of the CISS-T, DASH-T, SF-36-T, and the single questions were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The CISS-T showed an excellent correlation with the single questions (rho = 0.8 and 0.877), a good and negative correlation with the pain subscale of the SF-36 (rho = 0.617), and a moderate correlation with the DASH-T (rho = 0.592). CONCLUSION: As a result, the CISS-T is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the severity of cold intolerance. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7018297/ /pubmed/30866612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1808-170 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
TÖRE, Nurten Gizem
GÜMÜŞSOY, Mesken
OSKAY, Deran
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity Questionnaire
title Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity Questionnaire
title_full Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity Questionnaire
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity Questionnaire
title_short Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity Questionnaire
title_sort validity and reliability of the turkish version of the cold intolerance symptom severity questionnaire
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1808-170
work_keys_str_mv AT torenurtengizem validityandreliabilityoftheturkishversionofthecoldintolerancesymptomseverityquestionnaire
AT gumussoymesken validityandreliabilityoftheturkishversionofthecoldintolerancesymptomseverityquestionnaire
AT oskayderan validityandreliabilityoftheturkishversionofthecoldintolerancesymptomseverityquestionnaire