Cargando…

Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study

BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine whether or not there is a difference between the version of the bone and cartilage surfaces of the glenoid. Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices were examined in order to evaluate the measurements taken based on both the cartilage and bone joint surfaces. MATERI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DEVECİ, Alper, DURA, Yahya Can, SÖZMEN CILIZ, Deniz, ÖZDEMİR, Guzelali, KILIÇ, Enver, CEYHAN, Erman, KULAKOĞLU, Burak, TURAN, Sualp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1811-6
_version_ 1783497333235777536
author DEVECİ, Alper
DURA, Yahya Can
SÖZMEN CILIZ, Deniz
ÖZDEMİR, Guzelali
KILIÇ, Enver
CEYHAN, Erman
KULAKOĞLU, Burak
TURAN, Sualp
author_facet DEVECİ, Alper
DURA, Yahya Can
SÖZMEN CILIZ, Deniz
ÖZDEMİR, Guzelali
KILIÇ, Enver
CEYHAN, Erman
KULAKOĞLU, Burak
TURAN, Sualp
author_sort DEVECİ, Alper
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine whether or not there is a difference between the version of the bone and cartilage surfaces of the glenoid. Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices were examined in order to evaluate the measurements taken based on both the cartilage and bone joint surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was made of the MRI scans of 182 patients. All of the reviewers independently measured the glenoid version angles of all of the patients from 1–182. The process was then repeated, with each reviewer taking second measurements of the angles from 1–182. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was applied to evaluate the interaction and relationships between the measurements taken from the bone and cartilage. The intra- and interobserver interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were assessed. Analysis of variance was applied to determine any interobserver significant differences. RESULTS: The mean glenoid version was determined as –3.58 ± 4.08° in the bone-based measurements and –5.81 ± 4.30° in the cartilage-based measurements. The cartilage- and bone-based measurements were found to have inter- and intraobserver reliability. A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean cartilage-based version and the mean bone-based version. Changes in the cartilage- and bone-based measurements were correlated; however, this change was not linear. CONCLUSION: The cartilage-based version showed a significant difference from the bone- based version. Therefore, in the preoperative planning and evaluation of glenoid-based pathologies, it would be more appropriate to evaluate both the bone and cartilage surface on MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7018334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70183342020-03-23 Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study DEVECİ, Alper DURA, Yahya Can SÖZMEN CILIZ, Deniz ÖZDEMİR, Guzelali KILIÇ, Enver CEYHAN, Erman KULAKOĞLU, Burak TURAN, Sualp Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine whether or not there is a difference between the version of the bone and cartilage surfaces of the glenoid. Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices were examined in order to evaluate the measurements taken based on both the cartilage and bone joint surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was made of the MRI scans of 182 patients. All of the reviewers independently measured the glenoid version angles of all of the patients from 1–182. The process was then repeated, with each reviewer taking second measurements of the angles from 1–182. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was applied to evaluate the interaction and relationships between the measurements taken from the bone and cartilage. The intra- and interobserver interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were assessed. Analysis of variance was applied to determine any interobserver significant differences. RESULTS: The mean glenoid version was determined as –3.58 ± 4.08° in the bone-based measurements and –5.81 ± 4.30° in the cartilage-based measurements. The cartilage- and bone-based measurements were found to have inter- and intraobserver reliability. A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean cartilage-based version and the mean bone-based version. Changes in the cartilage- and bone-based measurements were correlated; however, this change was not linear. CONCLUSION: The cartilage-based version showed a significant difference from the bone- based version. Therefore, in the preoperative planning and evaluation of glenoid-based pathologies, it would be more appropriate to evaluate both the bone and cartilage surface on MRI. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7018334/ /pubmed/31549497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1811-6 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
DEVECİ, Alper
DURA, Yahya Can
SÖZMEN CILIZ, Deniz
ÖZDEMİR, Guzelali
KILIÇ, Enver
CEYHAN, Erman
KULAKOĞLU, Burak
TURAN, Sualp
Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study
title Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study
title_full Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study
title_fullStr Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study
title_full_unstemmed Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study
title_short Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study
title_sort is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? an mri study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1811-6
work_keys_str_mv AT devecialper istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy
AT durayahyacan istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy
AT sozmencilizdeniz istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy
AT ozdemirguzelali istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy
AT kilicenver istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy
AT ceyhanerman istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy
AT kulakogluburak istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy
AT turansualp istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy