Cargando…
Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study
BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine whether or not there is a difference between the version of the bone and cartilage surfaces of the glenoid. Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices were examined in order to evaluate the measurements taken based on both the cartilage and bone joint surfaces. MATERI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1811-6 |
_version_ | 1783497333235777536 |
---|---|
author | DEVECİ, Alper DURA, Yahya Can SÖZMEN CILIZ, Deniz ÖZDEMİR, Guzelali KILIÇ, Enver CEYHAN, Erman KULAKOĞLU, Burak TURAN, Sualp |
author_facet | DEVECİ, Alper DURA, Yahya Can SÖZMEN CILIZ, Deniz ÖZDEMİR, Guzelali KILIÇ, Enver CEYHAN, Erman KULAKOĞLU, Burak TURAN, Sualp |
author_sort | DEVECİ, Alper |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine whether or not there is a difference between the version of the bone and cartilage surfaces of the glenoid. Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices were examined in order to evaluate the measurements taken based on both the cartilage and bone joint surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was made of the MRI scans of 182 patients. All of the reviewers independently measured the glenoid version angles of all of the patients from 1–182. The process was then repeated, with each reviewer taking second measurements of the angles from 1–182. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was applied to evaluate the interaction and relationships between the measurements taken from the bone and cartilage. The intra- and interobserver interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were assessed. Analysis of variance was applied to determine any interobserver significant differences. RESULTS: The mean glenoid version was determined as –3.58 ± 4.08° in the bone-based measurements and –5.81 ± 4.30° in the cartilage-based measurements. The cartilage- and bone-based measurements were found to have inter- and intraobserver reliability. A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean cartilage-based version and the mean bone-based version. Changes in the cartilage- and bone-based measurements were correlated; however, this change was not linear. CONCLUSION: The cartilage-based version showed a significant difference from the bone- based version. Therefore, in the preoperative planning and evaluation of glenoid-based pathologies, it would be more appropriate to evaluate both the bone and cartilage surface on MRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7018334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70183342020-03-23 Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study DEVECİ, Alper DURA, Yahya Can SÖZMEN CILIZ, Deniz ÖZDEMİR, Guzelali KILIÇ, Enver CEYHAN, Erman KULAKOĞLU, Burak TURAN, Sualp Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine whether or not there is a difference between the version of the bone and cartilage surfaces of the glenoid. Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices were examined in order to evaluate the measurements taken based on both the cartilage and bone joint surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was made of the MRI scans of 182 patients. All of the reviewers independently measured the glenoid version angles of all of the patients from 1–182. The process was then repeated, with each reviewer taking second measurements of the angles from 1–182. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was applied to evaluate the interaction and relationships between the measurements taken from the bone and cartilage. The intra- and interobserver interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were assessed. Analysis of variance was applied to determine any interobserver significant differences. RESULTS: The mean glenoid version was determined as –3.58 ± 4.08° in the bone-based measurements and –5.81 ± 4.30° in the cartilage-based measurements. The cartilage- and bone-based measurements were found to have inter- and intraobserver reliability. A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean cartilage-based version and the mean bone-based version. Changes in the cartilage- and bone-based measurements were correlated; however, this change was not linear. CONCLUSION: The cartilage-based version showed a significant difference from the bone- based version. Therefore, in the preoperative planning and evaluation of glenoid-based pathologies, it would be more appropriate to evaluate both the bone and cartilage surface on MRI. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7018334/ /pubmed/31549497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1811-6 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article DEVECİ, Alper DURA, Yahya Can SÖZMEN CILIZ, Deniz ÖZDEMİR, Guzelali KILIÇ, Enver CEYHAN, Erman KULAKOĞLU, Burak TURAN, Sualp Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study |
title | Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study |
title_full | Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study |
title_fullStr | Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study |
title_short | Is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? An MRI study |
title_sort | is the version angle of the glenoid different in bone and cartilage? an mri study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1811-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devecialper istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy AT durayahyacan istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy AT sozmencilizdeniz istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy AT ozdemirguzelali istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy AT kilicenver istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy AT ceyhanerman istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy AT kulakogluburak istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy AT turansualp istheversionangleoftheglenoiddifferentinboneandcartilageanmristudy |