Cargando…

Ovarian stimulation modalities in poor responders

In a group of IVF/ICSI cycles, despite the appropriate ovarian stimulation, the number of oocytes collected is below the expected value. This condition is defined as poor ovarian response (POR) to stimulation. POR brings the risk of cycle cancellation with an estimated rate of 20%. Infertility exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	ÖZKAN, Zehra Sema
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31385487 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1905-179

Ejemplares similares

Treatment modalities for poor ovarian responders
por: Di Guardo, Federica, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Luteal phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders
por: Zhang, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of mild ovarian stimulation with conventional ovarian stimulation in poor responders
por: Yoo, Ji Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
por: Haahr, Thor, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Effectiveness of corifollitropin alfa used for ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients
por: Selman, Helmy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

What Is the Best Regimen for Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders in ART/IVF?
por: Blumenfeld, Zeev
Publicado: (2020)

Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
por: Zhang, John
Publicado: (2015)

Double or dual stimulation in poor ovarian responders: where do we stand?
por: Polat, Mehtap, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pregnancy Outcomes in Double Stimulation versus Two Consecutive Mild Stimulations for IVF in Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Li, Jingzhe, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

ANDRO-IVF: a novel protocol for poor responders to IVF controlled ovarian stimulation
por: Bercaire, Ludmila, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Predicting IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders
por: Lebovitz, Oshrit, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
por: Massin, N, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with or without clomiphene citrate for poor ovarian responders: a retrospective cohort study
por: Liu, Ahui, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial
por: Llácer, Joaquín, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Live Birth Rates in Poor Responders’ Group after Previous Treatment with Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Compared with Poor Responders Used Only Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Before in Vitro Fertilization
por: Stojkovska, Snezhana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

LH supplementation of ovarian stimulation protocols influences follicular fluid steroid composition contributing to the improvement of ovarian response in poor responder women
por: Marchiani, S., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Perifollicular Vascularity in Poor Ovarian Responders in In vitro Fertilization Cycles
por: Majeed, Asifa, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of pregnancy outcome after letrozole versus clomiphene treatment for mild ovarian stimulation protocol in poor responders
por: Eftekhar, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Type and dose of gonadotropins in poor ovarian responders: does it matter?
por: Boudry, Liese, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy
por: Merviel, Philippe, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

“Short agonist stop” protocol, an ovarian stimulation for poor responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF): A pilot study
por: Mauries, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Pilehvari, Shamim, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT
por: Ebrahimi, Mahbod, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Efficacies of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols in poor ovarian responders classified by the POSEIDON criteria
por: Li, Fei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Role of Overweight and Obesity in In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes of Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Vural, Fisun, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations
por: Liu, Xiaoping, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The best execution of the DuoStim strategy (double stimulation in the follicular and luteal phase of the same ovarian cycle) in patients who are poor ovarian responders
por: Luo, Yanqun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effect of varying doses of tamoxifen on ovarian histopathology, serum VEGF, and endothelin 1 levels in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an experimental study
por: Pala, Şehmus, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Datta, Adrija Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative Effectiveness of Mild or Conventional GnRH-Antagonist Protocols for Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders (Poseidon Group 4)
por: Le, Hoang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of the efficacy between bilateral proximal tubal occlusion and total salpingectomy on ovarian reserve and the cholinergic system: an experimental study
por: ATILGAN, Remzi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Ovarian Reserve Markers to Identify Poor Responders in the Context of Poseidon Classification
por: Grisendi, Valentina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The impact of dehydroepiandrosterone in poor ovarian responders on assisted reproduction technology treatment
por: Monteiro, Cecilia de Souza, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Letrozole as co-treatment agent in ovarian stimulation antagonist protocol in poor responders: A double-blind randomized clinical trial
por: Moini, Ashraf, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Low Dose Growth Hormone Adjuvant Treatment With Ultra-Long Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Responders Showed Non-inferior Pregnancy Outcome Compared With Normal Responders
por: Lee, Yi-Xuan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Does daily co administration of gonadotropins and letrozole during the ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome for poor and sub optimal responders?
por: Shapira, Moran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Minimal Ovarian Stimulation in-vitro Fertilization versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Propensity Score Adjusted Prospective Observational Study
por: de Souza, Tatiane Oliveira, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comment on “The Role of Overweight and Obesity in In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes of Poor Ovarian Responders”
por: Orvieto, Raoul
Publicado: (2015)

Dehydroepiandrosterone Ameliorates Abnormal Mitochondrial Dynamics and Mitophagy of Cumulus Cells in Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Li, Chia-Jung, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Weaned Sows with Small Ovarian Follicles Respond Poorly to the GnRH Agonist Buserelin
por: Lopes, Tania P., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_1i1nn8k2loska18mauhiif0h4r