Cargando…

Neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study aimed to examine whether the combination of neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT) techniques and chemotherapy with capecitabine is associated with better clinical and dosimetric outcomes compared to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: JANKARASHVILI, Natalia, KAKHADZE, Sophio, TOPESHASHVILI, Maia, TURKIASHVILI, Lasha, TCHIABRISHVILI, Mariam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1812-185
_version_ 1783497340276965376
author JANKARASHVILI, Natalia
KAKHADZE, Sophio
TOPESHASHVILI, Maia
TURKIASHVILI, Lasha
TCHIABRISHVILI, Mariam
author_facet JANKARASHVILI, Natalia
KAKHADZE, Sophio
TOPESHASHVILI, Maia
TURKIASHVILI, Lasha
TCHIABRISHVILI, Mariam
author_sort JANKARASHVILI, Natalia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study aimed to examine whether the combination of neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT) techniques and chemotherapy with capecitabine is associated with better clinical and dosimetric outcomes compared to the standard treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 59 patients with cT2–T4 rectal cancer. In the standard arm, patients (n = 37) were treated preoperatively with image-guided VMAT plus capecitabine. In the SIB arm, patients (n = 22) were treated with the SIB-VMAT technique plus capecitabine. All patients underwent radical surgical resection after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: In the standard arm, cT0N0 was reached in 12 patients (32.4%), primary tumor clinical downstaging was observed in 22 patients (59.5%), and disease stability was achieved in 3 patients (8.1%). In the SIB arm, cT0N0 was reached in 15 patients (68.2%), primary tumor clinical downstaging was observed in 6 patients (27.3%), and disease stability was achieved in 1 patient (4.5%) (P = 0.028). Complete pathological response was observed in 11 patients (29.7%) in the standard arm and in 13 patients (59.1%) in the SIB arm (P = 0.026). In the SIB arm mild diarrhea appeared in 59.1%, moderate in 40.9%, and severe in 0% of the cases. In the standard arm mild, moderate, and severe diarrhea rates were in 54.1%, 43.2%, and 2.7%, respectively. In the SIB arm mild, moderate, and severe cystitis appeared in 63.6%, 22.7%, and 13.6%, while in the standard group mild cystitis developed in 67.6%, moderate in 24.3%, and severe in 8.1%. Mild, moderate, and severe radiation dermatitis rates were 45.5%, 45.5%, and 9.1% in the SIB group and 40.5%, 48.6%, and 10.8% in the standard group, respectively. CONCLUSION: The SIB-VMAT technique is effective and safe for irradiating locally advanced rectal cancer. Its effectiveness is expressed in higher clinical and pathological complete response rates and safety with the same rates of acute toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7018366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70183662020-03-23 Neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer JANKARASHVILI, Natalia KAKHADZE, Sophio TOPESHASHVILI, Maia TURKIASHVILI, Lasha TCHIABRISHVILI, Mariam Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study aimed to examine whether the combination of neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT) techniques and chemotherapy with capecitabine is associated with better clinical and dosimetric outcomes compared to the standard treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 59 patients with cT2–T4 rectal cancer. In the standard arm, patients (n = 37) were treated preoperatively with image-guided VMAT plus capecitabine. In the SIB arm, patients (n = 22) were treated with the SIB-VMAT technique plus capecitabine. All patients underwent radical surgical resection after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: In the standard arm, cT0N0 was reached in 12 patients (32.4%), primary tumor clinical downstaging was observed in 22 patients (59.5%), and disease stability was achieved in 3 patients (8.1%). In the SIB arm, cT0N0 was reached in 15 patients (68.2%), primary tumor clinical downstaging was observed in 6 patients (27.3%), and disease stability was achieved in 1 patient (4.5%) (P = 0.028). Complete pathological response was observed in 11 patients (29.7%) in the standard arm and in 13 patients (59.1%) in the SIB arm (P = 0.026). In the SIB arm mild diarrhea appeared in 59.1%, moderate in 40.9%, and severe in 0% of the cases. In the standard arm mild, moderate, and severe diarrhea rates were in 54.1%, 43.2%, and 2.7%, respectively. In the SIB arm mild, moderate, and severe cystitis appeared in 63.6%, 22.7%, and 13.6%, while in the standard group mild cystitis developed in 67.6%, moderate in 24.3%, and severe in 8.1%. Mild, moderate, and severe radiation dermatitis rates were 45.5%, 45.5%, and 9.1% in the SIB group and 40.5%, 48.6%, and 10.8% in the standard group, respectively. CONCLUSION: The SIB-VMAT technique is effective and safe for irradiating locally advanced rectal cancer. Its effectiveness is expressed in higher clinical and pathological complete response rates and safety with the same rates of acute toxicity. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7018366/ /pubmed/31651118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1812-185 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
JANKARASHVILI, Natalia
KAKHADZE, Sophio
TOPESHASHVILI, Maia
TURKIASHVILI, Lasha
TCHIABRISHVILI, Mariam
Neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer
title Neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full Neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer
title_short Neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer
title_sort neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1812-185
work_keys_str_mv AT jankarashvilinatalia neoadjuvantvolumetricmodulatedarcradiochemotherapywithasimultaneousintegratedboosttechniquecomparedtostandardchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT kakhadzesophio neoadjuvantvolumetricmodulatedarcradiochemotherapywithasimultaneousintegratedboosttechniquecomparedtostandardchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT topeshashvilimaia neoadjuvantvolumetricmodulatedarcradiochemotherapywithasimultaneousintegratedboosttechniquecomparedtostandardchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT turkiashvililasha neoadjuvantvolumetricmodulatedarcradiochemotherapywithasimultaneousintegratedboosttechniquecomparedtostandardchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT tchiabrishvilimariam neoadjuvantvolumetricmodulatedarcradiochemotherapywithasimultaneousintegratedboosttechniquecomparedtostandardchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedrectalcancer