Cargando…
Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) carries a greater per-act risk of HIV acquisition than receptive vaginal intercourse (RVI) and may influence HIV epidemics driven by heterosexual sex. This systematic review explores the association between RAI and incident HIV among women, globally. We searched Emba...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31486008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0 |
_version_ | 1783497393452351488 |
---|---|
author | Stannah, James Silhol, Romain Elmes, Jocelyn Owen, Branwen Shacklett, Barbara L. Anton, Peter McGowan, Ian van der Straten, Ariane Dimitrov, Dobromir Baggaley, Rebecca F. Boily, Marie-Claude |
author_facet | Stannah, James Silhol, Romain Elmes, Jocelyn Owen, Branwen Shacklett, Barbara L. Anton, Peter McGowan, Ian van der Straten, Ariane Dimitrov, Dobromir Baggaley, Rebecca F. Boily, Marie-Claude |
author_sort | Stannah, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) carries a greater per-act risk of HIV acquisition than receptive vaginal intercourse (RVI) and may influence HIV epidemics driven by heterosexual sex. This systematic review explores the association between RAI and incident HIV among women, globally. We searched Embase and Medline through September 2018 for longitudinal studies reporting crude (cRR) or adjusted (aRR) relative risks of HIV acquisition by RAI practice among women. Of 27,563 articles identified, 17 eligible studies were included. We pooled independent study estimates using random-effects models. Women reporting RAI were more likely to acquire HIV than women not reporting RAI (pooled cRR = 1.56 95% CI 1.03–2.38, N = 18, I(2) = 72%; pooled aRR = 2.23, 1.01–4.92, N = 5, I(2) = 70%). In subgroup analyses the association was lower for women in Africa (pooled cRR = 1.16, N = 13, I(2) = 21%) than outside Africa (pooled cRR = 4.10, N = 5, I(2) = 79%) and for high-risk (pooled aRR = 1.69, N = 4, I(2) = 63%) than general-risk women (pooled aRR = 8.50, N = 1). Interview method slightly influenced cRR estimates (p value = 0.04). In leave-one-out sensitivity analyses pooled estimates were generally robust to removing individual study estimates. Main limitations included poor exposure definition, incomplete adjustment for confounders, particularly condom use, and use of non-confidential interview methods. More and better data are needed to explain differences in risk by world region and risk population. Women require better counselling and greater choice in prevention modalities that are effective during RVI and RAI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7018785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70187852020-02-28 Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Stannah, James Silhol, Romain Elmes, Jocelyn Owen, Branwen Shacklett, Barbara L. Anton, Peter McGowan, Ian van der Straten, Ariane Dimitrov, Dobromir Baggaley, Rebecca F. Boily, Marie-Claude AIDS Behav Original Paper Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) carries a greater per-act risk of HIV acquisition than receptive vaginal intercourse (RVI) and may influence HIV epidemics driven by heterosexual sex. This systematic review explores the association between RAI and incident HIV among women, globally. We searched Embase and Medline through September 2018 for longitudinal studies reporting crude (cRR) or adjusted (aRR) relative risks of HIV acquisition by RAI practice among women. Of 27,563 articles identified, 17 eligible studies were included. We pooled independent study estimates using random-effects models. Women reporting RAI were more likely to acquire HIV than women not reporting RAI (pooled cRR = 1.56 95% CI 1.03–2.38, N = 18, I(2) = 72%; pooled aRR = 2.23, 1.01–4.92, N = 5, I(2) = 70%). In subgroup analyses the association was lower for women in Africa (pooled cRR = 1.16, N = 13, I(2) = 21%) than outside Africa (pooled cRR = 4.10, N = 5, I(2) = 79%) and for high-risk (pooled aRR = 1.69, N = 4, I(2) = 63%) than general-risk women (pooled aRR = 8.50, N = 1). Interview method slightly influenced cRR estimates (p value = 0.04). In leave-one-out sensitivity analyses pooled estimates were generally robust to removing individual study estimates. Main limitations included poor exposure definition, incomplete adjustment for confounders, particularly condom use, and use of non-confidential interview methods. More and better data are needed to explain differences in risk by world region and risk population. Women require better counselling and greater choice in prevention modalities that are effective during RVI and RAI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-09-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7018785/ /pubmed/31486008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Stannah, James Silhol, Romain Elmes, Jocelyn Owen, Branwen Shacklett, Barbara L. Anton, Peter McGowan, Ian van der Straten, Ariane Dimitrov, Dobromir Baggaley, Rebecca F. Boily, Marie-Claude Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | increases in hiv incidence following receptive anal intercourse among women: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31486008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stannahjames increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT silholromain increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT elmesjocelyn increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT owenbranwen increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shacklettbarbaral increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT antonpeter increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mcgowanian increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanderstratenariane increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dimitrovdobromir increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baggaleyrebeccaf increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT boilymarieclaude increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |