Cargando…

Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) carries a greater per-act risk of HIV acquisition than receptive vaginal intercourse (RVI) and may influence HIV epidemics driven by heterosexual sex. This systematic review explores the association between RAI and incident HIV among women, globally. We searched Emba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stannah, James, Silhol, Romain, Elmes, Jocelyn, Owen, Branwen, Shacklett, Barbara L., Anton, Peter, McGowan, Ian, van der Straten, Ariane, Dimitrov, Dobromir, Baggaley, Rebecca F., Boily, Marie-Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31486008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0
_version_ 1783497393452351488
author Stannah, James
Silhol, Romain
Elmes, Jocelyn
Owen, Branwen
Shacklett, Barbara L.
Anton, Peter
McGowan, Ian
van der Straten, Ariane
Dimitrov, Dobromir
Baggaley, Rebecca F.
Boily, Marie-Claude
author_facet Stannah, James
Silhol, Romain
Elmes, Jocelyn
Owen, Branwen
Shacklett, Barbara L.
Anton, Peter
McGowan, Ian
van der Straten, Ariane
Dimitrov, Dobromir
Baggaley, Rebecca F.
Boily, Marie-Claude
author_sort Stannah, James
collection PubMed
description Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) carries a greater per-act risk of HIV acquisition than receptive vaginal intercourse (RVI) and may influence HIV epidemics driven by heterosexual sex. This systematic review explores the association between RAI and incident HIV among women, globally. We searched Embase and Medline through September 2018 for longitudinal studies reporting crude (cRR) or adjusted (aRR) relative risks of HIV acquisition by RAI practice among women. Of 27,563 articles identified, 17 eligible studies were included. We pooled independent study estimates using random-effects models. Women reporting RAI were more likely to acquire HIV than women not reporting RAI (pooled cRR = 1.56 95% CI 1.03–2.38, N = 18, I(2) = 72%; pooled aRR = 2.23, 1.01–4.92, N = 5, I(2) = 70%). In subgroup analyses the association was lower for women in Africa (pooled cRR = 1.16, N = 13, I(2) = 21%) than outside Africa (pooled cRR = 4.10, N = 5, I(2) = 79%) and for high-risk (pooled aRR = 1.69, N = 4, I(2) = 63%) than general-risk women (pooled aRR = 8.50, N = 1). Interview method slightly influenced cRR estimates (p value = 0.04). In leave-one-out sensitivity analyses pooled estimates were generally robust to removing individual study estimates. Main limitations included poor exposure definition, incomplete adjustment for confounders, particularly condom use, and use of non-confidential interview methods. More and better data are needed to explain differences in risk by world region and risk population. Women require better counselling and greater choice in prevention modalities that are effective during RVI and RAI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7018785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70187852020-02-28 Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Stannah, James Silhol, Romain Elmes, Jocelyn Owen, Branwen Shacklett, Barbara L. Anton, Peter McGowan, Ian van der Straten, Ariane Dimitrov, Dobromir Baggaley, Rebecca F. Boily, Marie-Claude AIDS Behav Original Paper Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) carries a greater per-act risk of HIV acquisition than receptive vaginal intercourse (RVI) and may influence HIV epidemics driven by heterosexual sex. This systematic review explores the association between RAI and incident HIV among women, globally. We searched Embase and Medline through September 2018 for longitudinal studies reporting crude (cRR) or adjusted (aRR) relative risks of HIV acquisition by RAI practice among women. Of 27,563 articles identified, 17 eligible studies were included. We pooled independent study estimates using random-effects models. Women reporting RAI were more likely to acquire HIV than women not reporting RAI (pooled cRR = 1.56 95% CI 1.03–2.38, N = 18, I(2) = 72%; pooled aRR = 2.23, 1.01–4.92, N = 5, I(2) = 70%). In subgroup analyses the association was lower for women in Africa (pooled cRR = 1.16, N = 13, I(2) = 21%) than outside Africa (pooled cRR = 4.10, N = 5, I(2) = 79%) and for high-risk (pooled aRR = 1.69, N = 4, I(2) = 63%) than general-risk women (pooled aRR = 8.50, N = 1). Interview method slightly influenced cRR estimates (p value = 0.04). In leave-one-out sensitivity analyses pooled estimates were generally robust to removing individual study estimates. Main limitations included poor exposure definition, incomplete adjustment for confounders, particularly condom use, and use of non-confidential interview methods. More and better data are needed to explain differences in risk by world region and risk population. Women require better counselling and greater choice in prevention modalities that are effective during RVI and RAI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-09-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7018785/ /pubmed/31486008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Stannah, James
Silhol, Romain
Elmes, Jocelyn
Owen, Branwen
Shacklett, Barbara L.
Anton, Peter
McGowan, Ian
van der Straten, Ariane
Dimitrov, Dobromir
Baggaley, Rebecca F.
Boily, Marie-Claude
Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Increases in HIV Incidence Following Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort increases in hiv incidence following receptive anal intercourse among women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31486008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02651-0
work_keys_str_mv AT stannahjames increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT silholromain increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elmesjocelyn increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT owenbranwen increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shacklettbarbaral increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT antonpeter increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcgowanian increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanderstratenariane increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dimitrovdobromir increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baggaleyrebeccaf increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boilymarieclaude increasesinhivincidencefollowingreceptiveanalintercourseamongwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis