Cargando…
The Use of Computer Simulation Modeling to Estimate Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparative Validation of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation Model
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation (CDS), a Microsoft Excel(®)-based patient-level simulation for type 2 diabetes mellitus based on risk equations from the revised United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model (UKPDS-OM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0156-x |
_version_ | 1783497415122223104 |
---|---|
author | Su, Zhuo T. Bartelt-Hofer, Jose Brown, Stephen Lew, Elisheva Sauriol, Luc Annemans, Lieven Grima, Daniel T. |
author_facet | Su, Zhuo T. Bartelt-Hofer, Jose Brown, Stephen Lew, Elisheva Sauriol, Luc Annemans, Lieven Grima, Daniel T. |
author_sort | Su, Zhuo T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation (CDS), a Microsoft Excel(®)-based patient-level simulation for type 2 diabetes mellitus based on risk equations from the revised United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model (UKPDS-OM2, also known as UKPDS 82). METHODS: Three levels of validation were conducted. Internal validation was assessed through independent review and model stress-testing. External validation was addressed by populating the CDS with baseline characteristics and treatment effects from three major diabetes clinical trials used in the Fifth Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge (MH5) for computer simulation models. Cross-validation of predicted outcomes was tested versus eight models that participated in the MH5. Simulated results were compared with observed clinical outcomes via the coefficient of determination (R(2)) for both the absolute risk of each clinical outcome and the difference in absolute risk between control and intervention arm in each trial. We ensured transparency of all model inputs and assumptions in reporting. RESULTS: The CDS could be used to predict 18 of 39 single and composite endpoints across the three trials. The model obtained an R(2) of 0.637 for predicted versus observed absolute risks, and an R(2) of 0.442 for predicted versus observed risk differences between control and intervention. Among the other eight models, only one obtained a higher R(2) value under both definitions, albeit based on only four predicted endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The CDS provides good predictions of diabetes-related complications when compared to observed trial outcomes and previously validated models. The model has value as a validated tool in cost-effectiveness evaluations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0156-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7018921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70189212020-02-28 The Use of Computer Simulation Modeling to Estimate Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparative Validation of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation Model Su, Zhuo T. Bartelt-Hofer, Jose Brown, Stephen Lew, Elisheva Sauriol, Luc Annemans, Lieven Grima, Daniel T. Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation (CDS), a Microsoft Excel(®)-based patient-level simulation for type 2 diabetes mellitus based on risk equations from the revised United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model (UKPDS-OM2, also known as UKPDS 82). METHODS: Three levels of validation were conducted. Internal validation was assessed through independent review and model stress-testing. External validation was addressed by populating the CDS with baseline characteristics and treatment effects from three major diabetes clinical trials used in the Fifth Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge (MH5) for computer simulation models. Cross-validation of predicted outcomes was tested versus eight models that participated in the MH5. Simulated results were compared with observed clinical outcomes via the coefficient of determination (R(2)) for both the absolute risk of each clinical outcome and the difference in absolute risk between control and intervention arm in each trial. We ensured transparency of all model inputs and assumptions in reporting. RESULTS: The CDS could be used to predict 18 of 39 single and composite endpoints across the three trials. The model obtained an R(2) of 0.637 for predicted versus observed absolute risks, and an R(2) of 0.442 for predicted versus observed risk differences between control and intervention. Among the other eight models, only one obtained a higher R(2) value under both definitions, albeit based on only four predicted endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The CDS provides good predictions of diabetes-related complications when compared to observed trial outcomes and previously validated models. The model has value as a validated tool in cost-effectiveness evaluations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0156-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7018921/ /pubmed/31254274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0156-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Su, Zhuo T. Bartelt-Hofer, Jose Brown, Stephen Lew, Elisheva Sauriol, Luc Annemans, Lieven Grima, Daniel T. The Use of Computer Simulation Modeling to Estimate Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparative Validation of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation Model |
title | The Use of Computer Simulation Modeling to Estimate Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparative Validation of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation Model |
title_full | The Use of Computer Simulation Modeling to Estimate Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparative Validation of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation Model |
title_fullStr | The Use of Computer Simulation Modeling to Estimate Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparative Validation of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation Model |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Computer Simulation Modeling to Estimate Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparative Validation of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation Model |
title_short | The Use of Computer Simulation Modeling to Estimate Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparative Validation of the Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation Model |
title_sort | use of computer simulation modeling to estimate complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparative validation of the cornerstone diabetes simulation model |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7018921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0156-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suzhuot theuseofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT bartelthoferjose theuseofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT brownstephen theuseofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT lewelisheva theuseofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT sauriolluc theuseofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT annemanslieven theuseofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT grimadanielt theuseofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT suzhuot useofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT bartelthoferjose useofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT brownstephen useofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT lewelisheva useofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT sauriolluc useofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT annemanslieven useofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel AT grimadanielt useofcomputersimulationmodelingtoestimatecomplicationsinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellituscomparativevalidationofthecornerstonediabetessimulationmodel |