Cargando…
Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion
Objectives: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is defined as a threefold increase in the amylase concentration in abdominal drains on or after the third postoperative day (POD). However, additional lipase fluid analysis is widely used despite lacking evidence. In this study, drain amylase and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861508 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010007 |
_version_ | 1783497489389715456 |
---|---|
author | Müssle, Benjamin Oehme, Florian Schade, Stephanie Sommer, Marian Bogner, Andreas Hempel, Sebastian Pochhammer, Julius Kahlert, Christoph Distler, Marius Weitz, Jürgen Welsch, Thilo |
author_facet | Müssle, Benjamin Oehme, Florian Schade, Stephanie Sommer, Marian Bogner, Andreas Hempel, Sebastian Pochhammer, Julius Kahlert, Christoph Distler, Marius Weitz, Jürgen Welsch, Thilo |
author_sort | Müssle, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is defined as a threefold increase in the amylase concentration in abdominal drains on or after the third postoperative day (POD). However, additional lipase fluid analysis is widely used despite lacking evidence. In this study, drain amylase and lipase levels were compared regarding their value in detecting POPF. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all patients who underwent pancreatic resections at our center between 2005 and 2016. Drain fluid analysis was performed from day 2 to 5. Results: 990 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 333 (34%) patients developed a POPF. The median amylase and lipase concentrations at POD 3 in cases with POPF were 11.55 µmol/(s·L) (≈13 ×-fold increase) and 39 µmol/(s·L) (≈39 ×-fold increase), respectively. Seven patients with subsequent POPF (2%) were missed with amylase analysis on POD 3, but detected using 3-fold lipase analysis. The false-positive rate of lipase was 51/424 = 12%. A cutoff lipase value at POD 3 of > 4.88 yielded a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 89% for development of a POPF. Increased body mass index turned out as risk factor for the development of POPF in a multivariable model. Conclusions: Threefold-elevated lipase concentration may be used as an indicator of a POPF. However, the additional detection of POPF using simultaneous lipase analysis is marginal. Therefore, assessment of lipase concentration does not provide added clinical value and only results in extra costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7019284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70192842020-03-04 Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion Müssle, Benjamin Oehme, Florian Schade, Stephanie Sommer, Marian Bogner, Andreas Hempel, Sebastian Pochhammer, Julius Kahlert, Christoph Distler, Marius Weitz, Jürgen Welsch, Thilo J Clin Med Article Objectives: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is defined as a threefold increase in the amylase concentration in abdominal drains on or after the third postoperative day (POD). However, additional lipase fluid analysis is widely used despite lacking evidence. In this study, drain amylase and lipase levels were compared regarding their value in detecting POPF. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all patients who underwent pancreatic resections at our center between 2005 and 2016. Drain fluid analysis was performed from day 2 to 5. Results: 990 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 333 (34%) patients developed a POPF. The median amylase and lipase concentrations at POD 3 in cases with POPF were 11.55 µmol/(s·L) (≈13 ×-fold increase) and 39 µmol/(s·L) (≈39 ×-fold increase), respectively. Seven patients with subsequent POPF (2%) were missed with amylase analysis on POD 3, but detected using 3-fold lipase analysis. The false-positive rate of lipase was 51/424 = 12%. A cutoff lipase value at POD 3 of > 4.88 yielded a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 89% for development of a POPF. Increased body mass index turned out as risk factor for the development of POPF in a multivariable model. Conclusions: Threefold-elevated lipase concentration may be used as an indicator of a POPF. However, the additional detection of POPF using simultaneous lipase analysis is marginal. Therefore, assessment of lipase concentration does not provide added clinical value and only results in extra costs. MDPI 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7019284/ /pubmed/31861508 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010007 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Müssle, Benjamin Oehme, Florian Schade, Stephanie Sommer, Marian Bogner, Andreas Hempel, Sebastian Pochhammer, Julius Kahlert, Christoph Distler, Marius Weitz, Jürgen Welsch, Thilo Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion |
title | Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion |
title_full | Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion |
title_fullStr | Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion |
title_full_unstemmed | Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion |
title_short | Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion |
title_sort | drain amylase or lipase for the detection of popf—adding evidence to an ongoing discussion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861508 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT musslebenjamin drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT oehmeflorian drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT schadestephanie drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT sommermarian drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT bognerandreas drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT hempelsebastian drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT pochhammerjulius drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT kahlertchristoph drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT distlermarius drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT weitzjurgen drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion AT welschthilo drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion |