Cargando…

Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion

Objectives: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is defined as a threefold increase in the amylase concentration in abdominal drains on or after the third postoperative day (POD). However, additional lipase fluid analysis is widely used despite lacking evidence. In this study, drain amylase and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müssle, Benjamin, Oehme, Florian, Schade, Stephanie, Sommer, Marian, Bogner, Andreas, Hempel, Sebastian, Pochhammer, Julius, Kahlert, Christoph, Distler, Marius, Weitz, Jürgen, Welsch, Thilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010007
_version_ 1783497489389715456
author Müssle, Benjamin
Oehme, Florian
Schade, Stephanie
Sommer, Marian
Bogner, Andreas
Hempel, Sebastian
Pochhammer, Julius
Kahlert, Christoph
Distler, Marius
Weitz, Jürgen
Welsch, Thilo
author_facet Müssle, Benjamin
Oehme, Florian
Schade, Stephanie
Sommer, Marian
Bogner, Andreas
Hempel, Sebastian
Pochhammer, Julius
Kahlert, Christoph
Distler, Marius
Weitz, Jürgen
Welsch, Thilo
author_sort Müssle, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description Objectives: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is defined as a threefold increase in the amylase concentration in abdominal drains on or after the third postoperative day (POD). However, additional lipase fluid analysis is widely used despite lacking evidence. In this study, drain amylase and lipase levels were compared regarding their value in detecting POPF. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all patients who underwent pancreatic resections at our center between 2005 and 2016. Drain fluid analysis was performed from day 2 to 5. Results: 990 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 333 (34%) patients developed a POPF. The median amylase and lipase concentrations at POD 3 in cases with POPF were 11.55 µmol/(s·L) (≈13 ×-fold increase) and 39 µmol/(s·L) (≈39 ×-fold increase), respectively. Seven patients with subsequent POPF (2%) were missed with amylase analysis on POD 3, but detected using 3-fold lipase analysis. The false-positive rate of lipase was 51/424 = 12%. A cutoff lipase value at POD 3 of > 4.88 yielded a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 89% for development of a POPF. Increased body mass index turned out as risk factor for the development of POPF in a multivariable model. Conclusions: Threefold-elevated lipase concentration may be used as an indicator of a POPF. However, the additional detection of POPF using simultaneous lipase analysis is marginal. Therefore, assessment of lipase concentration does not provide added clinical value and only results in extra costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7019284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70192842020-03-04 Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion Müssle, Benjamin Oehme, Florian Schade, Stephanie Sommer, Marian Bogner, Andreas Hempel, Sebastian Pochhammer, Julius Kahlert, Christoph Distler, Marius Weitz, Jürgen Welsch, Thilo J Clin Med Article Objectives: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is defined as a threefold increase in the amylase concentration in abdominal drains on or after the third postoperative day (POD). However, additional lipase fluid analysis is widely used despite lacking evidence. In this study, drain amylase and lipase levels were compared regarding their value in detecting POPF. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all patients who underwent pancreatic resections at our center between 2005 and 2016. Drain fluid analysis was performed from day 2 to 5. Results: 990 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 333 (34%) patients developed a POPF. The median amylase and lipase concentrations at POD 3 in cases with POPF were 11.55 µmol/(s·L) (≈13 ×-fold increase) and 39 µmol/(s·L) (≈39 ×-fold increase), respectively. Seven patients with subsequent POPF (2%) were missed with amylase analysis on POD 3, but detected using 3-fold lipase analysis. The false-positive rate of lipase was 51/424 = 12%. A cutoff lipase value at POD 3 of > 4.88 yielded a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 89% for development of a POPF. Increased body mass index turned out as risk factor for the development of POPF in a multivariable model. Conclusions: Threefold-elevated lipase concentration may be used as an indicator of a POPF. However, the additional detection of POPF using simultaneous lipase analysis is marginal. Therefore, assessment of lipase concentration does not provide added clinical value and only results in extra costs. MDPI 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7019284/ /pubmed/31861508 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010007 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Müssle, Benjamin
Oehme, Florian
Schade, Stephanie
Sommer, Marian
Bogner, Andreas
Hempel, Sebastian
Pochhammer, Julius
Kahlert, Christoph
Distler, Marius
Weitz, Jürgen
Welsch, Thilo
Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion
title Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion
title_full Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion
title_fullStr Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion
title_full_unstemmed Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion
title_short Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF—Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion
title_sort drain amylase or lipase for the detection of popf—adding evidence to an ongoing discussion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010007
work_keys_str_mv AT musslebenjamin drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT oehmeflorian drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT schadestephanie drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT sommermarian drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT bognerandreas drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT hempelsebastian drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT pochhammerjulius drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT kahlertchristoph drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT distlermarius drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT weitzjurgen drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion
AT welschthilo drainamylaseorlipaseforthedetectionofpopfaddingevidencetoanongoingdiscussion