Cargando…
Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study
Platelet function (PF) plays a pivotal role in both hemostasis and thrombosis, and manual light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is considered the standard of care for platelet function testing but is an error-prone and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to test the agreement regarding maximum aggreg...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31773967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029619885184 |
_version_ | 1783497515863113728 |
---|---|
author | Stratmann, Jan Karmal, Lida Zwinge, Birga Miesbach, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Stratmann, Jan Karmal, Lida Zwinge, Birga Miesbach, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Stratmann, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Platelet function (PF) plays a pivotal role in both hemostasis and thrombosis, and manual light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is considered the standard of care for platelet function testing but is an error-prone and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to test the agreement regarding maximum aggregation (MA), velocity (VEL), and lag-phase (LagP) of platelet aggregation of the automated Sysmex CS-2100i analyzer (Siemens, Germany) against the APACT 4004 (Elitech, France) in samples derived from healthy participants and patients with hemostaseologic disorders. In total, 123 patient-derived samples were investigated, including 42 patients with acetylsalicylic acid and/or clopidogrel intake and 20 patients with other hemostaseologic disorders. Both MA and VEL showed good or excellent intermethod correlation. Agreement between the testing methods was only partially achieved, and values were indicative for a systematic bias to lower measurements below a threshold of 50% MA with the CS-2100i compared to the APACT 4004. All patients with impaired PF in the APACT 4004 were successfully identified with the CS-2100i, and reference values for automated LTA are provided. Conclusively, automated LTA with the CS-2100i is a highly standardized and reliable PF testing method and represents a decisive step in the simplification of platelet function testing in clinical routine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7019398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70193982020-02-27 Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study Stratmann, Jan Karmal, Lida Zwinge, Birga Miesbach, Wolfgang Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Article Platelet function (PF) plays a pivotal role in both hemostasis and thrombosis, and manual light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is considered the standard of care for platelet function testing but is an error-prone and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to test the agreement regarding maximum aggregation (MA), velocity (VEL), and lag-phase (LagP) of platelet aggregation of the automated Sysmex CS-2100i analyzer (Siemens, Germany) against the APACT 4004 (Elitech, France) in samples derived from healthy participants and patients with hemostaseologic disorders. In total, 123 patient-derived samples were investigated, including 42 patients with acetylsalicylic acid and/or clopidogrel intake and 20 patients with other hemostaseologic disorders. Both MA and VEL showed good or excellent intermethod correlation. Agreement between the testing methods was only partially achieved, and values were indicative for a systematic bias to lower measurements below a threshold of 50% MA with the CS-2100i compared to the APACT 4004. All patients with impaired PF in the APACT 4004 were successfully identified with the CS-2100i, and reference values for automated LTA are provided. Conclusively, automated LTA with the CS-2100i is a highly standardized and reliable PF testing method and represents a decisive step in the simplification of platelet function testing in clinical routine. SAGE Publications 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7019398/ /pubmed/31773967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029619885184 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stratmann, Jan Karmal, Lida Zwinge, Birga Miesbach, Wolfgang Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study |
title | Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method
Comparison Study |
title_full | Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method
Comparison Study |
title_fullStr | Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method
Comparison Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method
Comparison Study |
title_short | Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method
Comparison Study |
title_sort | platelet aggregation testing on a routine coagulation analyzer: a method
comparison study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31773967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029619885184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stratmannjan plateletaggregationtestingonaroutinecoagulationanalyzeramethodcomparisonstudy AT karmallida plateletaggregationtestingonaroutinecoagulationanalyzeramethodcomparisonstudy AT zwingebirga plateletaggregationtestingonaroutinecoagulationanalyzeramethodcomparisonstudy AT miesbachwolfgang plateletaggregationtestingonaroutinecoagulationanalyzeramethodcomparisonstudy |