Cargando…

Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study

Platelet function (PF) plays a pivotal role in both hemostasis and thrombosis, and manual light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is considered the standard of care for platelet function testing but is an error-prone and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to test the agreement regarding maximum aggreg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stratmann, Jan, Karmal, Lida, Zwinge, Birga, Miesbach, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31773967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029619885184
_version_ 1783497515863113728
author Stratmann, Jan
Karmal, Lida
Zwinge, Birga
Miesbach, Wolfgang
author_facet Stratmann, Jan
Karmal, Lida
Zwinge, Birga
Miesbach, Wolfgang
author_sort Stratmann, Jan
collection PubMed
description Platelet function (PF) plays a pivotal role in both hemostasis and thrombosis, and manual light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is considered the standard of care for platelet function testing but is an error-prone and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to test the agreement regarding maximum aggregation (MA), velocity (VEL), and lag-phase (LagP) of platelet aggregation of the automated Sysmex CS-2100i analyzer (Siemens, Germany) against the APACT 4004 (Elitech, France) in samples derived from healthy participants and patients with hemostaseologic disorders. In total, 123 patient-derived samples were investigated, including 42 patients with acetylsalicylic acid and/or clopidogrel intake and 20 patients with other hemostaseologic disorders. Both MA and VEL showed good or excellent intermethod correlation. Agreement between the testing methods was only partially achieved, and values were indicative for a systematic bias to lower measurements below a threshold of 50% MA with the CS-2100i compared to the APACT 4004. All patients with impaired PF in the APACT 4004 were successfully identified with the CS-2100i, and reference values for automated LTA are provided. Conclusively, automated LTA with the CS-2100i is a highly standardized and reliable PF testing method and represents a decisive step in the simplification of platelet function testing in clinical routine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7019398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70193982020-02-27 Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study Stratmann, Jan Karmal, Lida Zwinge, Birga Miesbach, Wolfgang Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Article Platelet function (PF) plays a pivotal role in both hemostasis and thrombosis, and manual light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is considered the standard of care for platelet function testing but is an error-prone and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to test the agreement regarding maximum aggregation (MA), velocity (VEL), and lag-phase (LagP) of platelet aggregation of the automated Sysmex CS-2100i analyzer (Siemens, Germany) against the APACT 4004 (Elitech, France) in samples derived from healthy participants and patients with hemostaseologic disorders. In total, 123 patient-derived samples were investigated, including 42 patients with acetylsalicylic acid and/or clopidogrel intake and 20 patients with other hemostaseologic disorders. Both MA and VEL showed good or excellent intermethod correlation. Agreement between the testing methods was only partially achieved, and values were indicative for a systematic bias to lower measurements below a threshold of 50% MA with the CS-2100i compared to the APACT 4004. All patients with impaired PF in the APACT 4004 were successfully identified with the CS-2100i, and reference values for automated LTA are provided. Conclusively, automated LTA with the CS-2100i is a highly standardized and reliable PF testing method and represents a decisive step in the simplification of platelet function testing in clinical routine. SAGE Publications 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7019398/ /pubmed/31773967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029619885184 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Stratmann, Jan
Karmal, Lida
Zwinge, Birga
Miesbach, Wolfgang
Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study
title Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study
title_full Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study
title_fullStr Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study
title_short Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study
title_sort platelet aggregation testing on a routine coagulation analyzer: a method comparison study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31773967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029619885184
work_keys_str_mv AT stratmannjan plateletaggregationtestingonaroutinecoagulationanalyzeramethodcomparisonstudy
AT karmallida plateletaggregationtestingonaroutinecoagulationanalyzeramethodcomparisonstudy
AT zwingebirga plateletaggregationtestingonaroutinecoagulationanalyzeramethodcomparisonstudy
AT miesbachwolfgang plateletaggregationtestingonaroutinecoagulationanalyzeramethodcomparisonstudy