Cargando…
Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis
Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) represent a rare diagnosis of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. Evidence from the current literature regarding their epidemiology, biology, and management is of variable quality and conflicting. Based on available data, the MiNEN has an ag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010273 |
_version_ | 1783497518654423040 |
---|---|
author | Frizziero, Melissa Chakrabarty, Bipasha Nagy, Bence Lamarca, Angela Hubner, Richard A. Valle, Juan W. McNamara, Mairéad G. |
author_facet | Frizziero, Melissa Chakrabarty, Bipasha Nagy, Bence Lamarca, Angela Hubner, Richard A. Valle, Juan W. McNamara, Mairéad G. |
author_sort | Frizziero, Melissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) represent a rare diagnosis of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. Evidence from the current literature regarding their epidemiology, biology, and management is of variable quality and conflicting. Based on available data, the MiNEN has an aggressive biological behaviour, mostly driven by its (often high-grade) neuroendocrine component, and a dismal prognosis. In most cases, the non-neuroendocrine component is of adenocarcinoma histology. Due to limitations in diagnostic methods and poor awareness within the scientific community, the incidence of MiNENs may be underestimated. In the absence of data from clinical trials, MiNENs are commonly treated according to the standard of care for pure neuroendocrine carcinomas or adenocarcinomas from the same sites of origin, based on the assumption of a biological similarity to their pure counterparts. However, little is known about the molecular aberrations of MiNENs, and their pathogenesis remains controversial; molecular/genetic studies conducted so far point towards a common monoclonal origin of the two components. In addition, mutations in tumour-associated genes, including TP53, BRAF, and KRAS, and microsatellite instability have emerged as potential drivers of MiNENs. This systematic review (91 full manuscripts or abstracts in English language) summarises the current reported literature on clinical, pathological, survival, and molecular/genetic data on MiNENs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7019410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70194102020-03-09 Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis Frizziero, Melissa Chakrabarty, Bipasha Nagy, Bence Lamarca, Angela Hubner, Richard A. Valle, Juan W. McNamara, Mairéad G. J Clin Med Review Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) represent a rare diagnosis of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. Evidence from the current literature regarding their epidemiology, biology, and management is of variable quality and conflicting. Based on available data, the MiNEN has an aggressive biological behaviour, mostly driven by its (often high-grade) neuroendocrine component, and a dismal prognosis. In most cases, the non-neuroendocrine component is of adenocarcinoma histology. Due to limitations in diagnostic methods and poor awareness within the scientific community, the incidence of MiNENs may be underestimated. In the absence of data from clinical trials, MiNENs are commonly treated according to the standard of care for pure neuroendocrine carcinomas or adenocarcinomas from the same sites of origin, based on the assumption of a biological similarity to their pure counterparts. However, little is known about the molecular aberrations of MiNENs, and their pathogenesis remains controversial; molecular/genetic studies conducted so far point towards a common monoclonal origin of the two components. In addition, mutations in tumour-associated genes, including TP53, BRAF, and KRAS, and microsatellite instability have emerged as potential drivers of MiNENs. This systematic review (91 full manuscripts or abstracts in English language) summarises the current reported literature on clinical, pathological, survival, and molecular/genetic data on MiNENs. MDPI 2020-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7019410/ /pubmed/31963850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010273 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Frizziero, Melissa Chakrabarty, Bipasha Nagy, Bence Lamarca, Angela Hubner, Richard A. Valle, Juan W. McNamara, Mairéad G. Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis |
title | Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis |
title_full | Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis |
title_short | Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis |
title_sort | mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review of a controversial and underestimated diagnosis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frizzieromelissa mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis AT chakrabartybipasha mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis AT nagybence mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis AT lamarcaangela mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis AT hubnerricharda mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis AT vallejuanw mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis AT mcnamaramaireadg mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis |