Cargando…

Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) represent a rare diagnosis of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. Evidence from the current literature regarding their epidemiology, biology, and management is of variable quality and conflicting. Based on available data, the MiNEN has an ag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frizziero, Melissa, Chakrabarty, Bipasha, Nagy, Bence, Lamarca, Angela, Hubner, Richard A., Valle, Juan W., McNamara, Mairéad G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010273
_version_ 1783497518654423040
author Frizziero, Melissa
Chakrabarty, Bipasha
Nagy, Bence
Lamarca, Angela
Hubner, Richard A.
Valle, Juan W.
McNamara, Mairéad G.
author_facet Frizziero, Melissa
Chakrabarty, Bipasha
Nagy, Bence
Lamarca, Angela
Hubner, Richard A.
Valle, Juan W.
McNamara, Mairéad G.
author_sort Frizziero, Melissa
collection PubMed
description Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) represent a rare diagnosis of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. Evidence from the current literature regarding their epidemiology, biology, and management is of variable quality and conflicting. Based on available data, the MiNEN has an aggressive biological behaviour, mostly driven by its (often high-grade) neuroendocrine component, and a dismal prognosis. In most cases, the non-neuroendocrine component is of adenocarcinoma histology. Due to limitations in diagnostic methods and poor awareness within the scientific community, the incidence of MiNENs may be underestimated. In the absence of data from clinical trials, MiNENs are commonly treated according to the standard of care for pure neuroendocrine carcinomas or adenocarcinomas from the same sites of origin, based on the assumption of a biological similarity to their pure counterparts. However, little is known about the molecular aberrations of MiNENs, and their pathogenesis remains controversial; molecular/genetic studies conducted so far point towards a common monoclonal origin of the two components. In addition, mutations in tumour-associated genes, including TP53, BRAF, and KRAS, and microsatellite instability have emerged as potential drivers of MiNENs. This systematic review (91 full manuscripts or abstracts in English language) summarises the current reported literature on clinical, pathological, survival, and molecular/genetic data on MiNENs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7019410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70194102020-03-09 Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis Frizziero, Melissa Chakrabarty, Bipasha Nagy, Bence Lamarca, Angela Hubner, Richard A. Valle, Juan W. McNamara, Mairéad G. J Clin Med Review Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) represent a rare diagnosis of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. Evidence from the current literature regarding their epidemiology, biology, and management is of variable quality and conflicting. Based on available data, the MiNEN has an aggressive biological behaviour, mostly driven by its (often high-grade) neuroendocrine component, and a dismal prognosis. In most cases, the non-neuroendocrine component is of adenocarcinoma histology. Due to limitations in diagnostic methods and poor awareness within the scientific community, the incidence of MiNENs may be underestimated. In the absence of data from clinical trials, MiNENs are commonly treated according to the standard of care for pure neuroendocrine carcinomas or adenocarcinomas from the same sites of origin, based on the assumption of a biological similarity to their pure counterparts. However, little is known about the molecular aberrations of MiNENs, and their pathogenesis remains controversial; molecular/genetic studies conducted so far point towards a common monoclonal origin of the two components. In addition, mutations in tumour-associated genes, including TP53, BRAF, and KRAS, and microsatellite instability have emerged as potential drivers of MiNENs. This systematic review (91 full manuscripts or abstracts in English language) summarises the current reported literature on clinical, pathological, survival, and molecular/genetic data on MiNENs. MDPI 2020-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7019410/ /pubmed/31963850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010273 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Frizziero, Melissa
Chakrabarty, Bipasha
Nagy, Bence
Lamarca, Angela
Hubner, Richard A.
Valle, Juan W.
McNamara, Mairéad G.
Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis
title Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis
title_full Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis
title_fullStr Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis
title_short Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of a Controversial and Underestimated Diagnosis
title_sort mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review of a controversial and underestimated diagnosis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31963850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010273
work_keys_str_mv AT frizzieromelissa mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis
AT chakrabartybipasha mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis
AT nagybence mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis
AT lamarcaangela mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis
AT hubnerricharda mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis
AT vallejuanw mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis
AT mcnamaramaireadg mixedneuroendocrinenonneuroendocrineneoplasmsasystematicreviewofacontroversialandunderestimateddiagnosis