Cargando…
The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Respiratory muscle dysfunction is an important health problem with high morbidity and mortality and associated costs in patients with bronchiectasis (BC). The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of therapeutic respiratory muscle training (RMT) interventions on improving sputum c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952338 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010231 |
_version_ | 1783497574895845376 |
---|---|
author | Martín-Valero, Rocio Jimenez-Cebrian, Ana Maria Moral-Munoz, Jose A de-la-Casa-Almeida, Maria Rodriguez-Huguet, Manuel Casuso-Holgado, Maria Jesus |
author_facet | Martín-Valero, Rocio Jimenez-Cebrian, Ana Maria Moral-Munoz, Jose A de-la-Casa-Almeida, Maria Rodriguez-Huguet, Manuel Casuso-Holgado, Maria Jesus |
author_sort | Martín-Valero, Rocio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Respiratory muscle dysfunction is an important health problem with high morbidity and mortality and associated costs in patients with bronchiectasis (BC). The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of therapeutic respiratory muscle training (RMT) interventions on improving sputum clearance, ventilator function, muscle strength and functional capacity in BC. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Two independent investigators searched using several electronic databases. The methodological quality of nine studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Study selection/eligibility criteria: The following were included: randomised controlled trials, randomised crossover trials and pilot studies of patients with BC that used the intervention as RMT (inspiratory/expiratory) and evaluations of respiratory muscle strength (maximal expiratory pressure/maximal inspiratory pressure). This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017075101). Nine studies were included, five of which obtained an A recommendation grade, three with B, and one with C. Study quality was poor to good (mean PEDro Score of 6.375 out of 10). Studies had small sample sizes (8–98). Results show improvements on PImax in favour of therapeutic respiratory muscle training intervention (MD = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.38, 10.77; p < 0.01; I(2) = 92%). However, high heterogeneity was identified on meta-analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7019679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70196792020-03-09 The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Martín-Valero, Rocio Jimenez-Cebrian, Ana Maria Moral-Munoz, Jose A de-la-Casa-Almeida, Maria Rodriguez-Huguet, Manuel Casuso-Holgado, Maria Jesus J Clin Med Review Background: Respiratory muscle dysfunction is an important health problem with high morbidity and mortality and associated costs in patients with bronchiectasis (BC). The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of therapeutic respiratory muscle training (RMT) interventions on improving sputum clearance, ventilator function, muscle strength and functional capacity in BC. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Two independent investigators searched using several electronic databases. The methodological quality of nine studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Study selection/eligibility criteria: The following were included: randomised controlled trials, randomised crossover trials and pilot studies of patients with BC that used the intervention as RMT (inspiratory/expiratory) and evaluations of respiratory muscle strength (maximal expiratory pressure/maximal inspiratory pressure). This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017075101). Nine studies were included, five of which obtained an A recommendation grade, three with B, and one with C. Study quality was poor to good (mean PEDro Score of 6.375 out of 10). Studies had small sample sizes (8–98). Results show improvements on PImax in favour of therapeutic respiratory muscle training intervention (MD = 6.08; 95% CI = 1.38, 10.77; p < 0.01; I(2) = 92%). However, high heterogeneity was identified on meta-analysis. MDPI 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7019679/ /pubmed/31952338 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010231 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Martín-Valero, Rocio Jimenez-Cebrian, Ana Maria Moral-Munoz, Jose A de-la-Casa-Almeida, Maria Rodriguez-Huguet, Manuel Casuso-Holgado, Maria Jesus The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Efficacy of Therapeutic Respiratory Muscle Training Interventions in People with Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of therapeutic respiratory muscle training interventions in people with bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952338 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinvalerorocio theefficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jimenezcebriananamaria theefficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT moralmunozjosea theefficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT delacasaalmeidamaria theefficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rodriguezhuguetmanuel theefficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT casusoholgadomariajesus theefficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT martinvalerorocio efficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jimenezcebriananamaria efficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT moralmunozjosea efficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT delacasaalmeidamaria efficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rodriguezhuguetmanuel efficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT casusoholgadomariajesus efficacyoftherapeuticrespiratorymuscletraininginterventionsinpeoplewithbronchiectasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |