Differences in the Head Roll Test, Bow and Lean Test, and Null Plane between Persistent and Transient Geotropic Direction-Changing Positional Nystagmus

Background: Persistent geotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) has the characteristics of cupulopathy, but its underlying pathogenesis is not known. We investigated the relationship of the results of the head roll test, bow and lean test, and side of the null plane between persistent and transient geotropic DCPN to determine the lesion side of persistent geotropic DCPN and understand its mechanism. Methods: We enrolled 25 patients with persistent geotropic DCPN and 41 with transient geotropic DCPN. We compared the results of the head roll test, bow and lean test, and side of the null plane between the two groups. Results: The rates of bowing and leaning nystagmus were significantly higher in the persistent DCPN group. Only 16.0% of the persistent DCPN patients had stronger nystagmus in the head roll test and the null plane on the same side. The rates of the direction of bowing nystagmus in the bow and lean test and stronger nystagmus in the head roll test on the same side were also significantly lower in persistent DCPN than in transient DCPN. Conclusion: It was difficult to determine the lesion side in persistent geotropic DCPN using the direction of stronger nystagmus in the head roll test and null plane when the direction of the stronger nystagmus and null plane were opposite. Further study is needed to understand the position of the cupula according to head rotation and the anatomical position in persistent geotropic DCPN.