Cargando…
Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials
Clinical applications of ginger with an expectation of clinical benefits are receiving significant attention. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion in terms of the clinical effects of ginger in all reported areas. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic rev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31935866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12010157 |
_version_ | 1783497634889072640 |
---|---|
author | Anh, Nguyen Hoang Kim, Sun Jo Long, Nguyen Phuoc Min, Jung Eun Yoon, Young Cheol Lee, Eun Goo Kim, Mina Kim, Tae Joon Yang, Yoon Young Son, Eui Young Yoon, Sang Jun Diem, Nguyen Co Kim, Hyung Min Kwon, Sung Won |
author_facet | Anh, Nguyen Hoang Kim, Sun Jo Long, Nguyen Phuoc Min, Jung Eun Yoon, Young Cheol Lee, Eun Goo Kim, Mina Kim, Tae Joon Yang, Yoon Young Son, Eui Young Yoon, Sang Jun Diem, Nguyen Co Kim, Hyung Min Kwon, Sung Won |
author_sort | Anh, Nguyen Hoang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical applications of ginger with an expectation of clinical benefits are receiving significant attention. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion in terms of the clinical effects of ginger in all reported areas. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline, randomized controlled trials on the effects of ginger were investigated. Accordingly, 109 eligible papers were fully extracted in terms of study design, population characteristics, evaluation systems, adverse effects, and main outcomes. The reporting quality of the included studies was assessed based on the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials and integrated together with studies that investigated the same subjects. The included studies that examined the improvement of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, inflammation, metabolic syndromes, digestive function, and colorectal cancer’s markers were consistently supported, whereas other expected functions were relatively controversial. Nevertheless, only 43 clinical trials (39.4%) met the criterion of having a ‘high quality of evidence.’ In addition to the quality assessment result, small populations and unstandardized evaluation systems were the observed shortcomings in ginger clinical trials. Further studies with adequate designs are warranted to validate the reported clinical functions of ginger. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7019938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70199382020-03-09 Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials Anh, Nguyen Hoang Kim, Sun Jo Long, Nguyen Phuoc Min, Jung Eun Yoon, Young Cheol Lee, Eun Goo Kim, Mina Kim, Tae Joon Yang, Yoon Young Son, Eui Young Yoon, Sang Jun Diem, Nguyen Co Kim, Hyung Min Kwon, Sung Won Nutrients Review Clinical applications of ginger with an expectation of clinical benefits are receiving significant attention. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion in terms of the clinical effects of ginger in all reported areas. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline, randomized controlled trials on the effects of ginger were investigated. Accordingly, 109 eligible papers were fully extracted in terms of study design, population characteristics, evaluation systems, adverse effects, and main outcomes. The reporting quality of the included studies was assessed based on the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials and integrated together with studies that investigated the same subjects. The included studies that examined the improvement of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, inflammation, metabolic syndromes, digestive function, and colorectal cancer’s markers were consistently supported, whereas other expected functions were relatively controversial. Nevertheless, only 43 clinical trials (39.4%) met the criterion of having a ‘high quality of evidence.’ In addition to the quality assessment result, small populations and unstandardized evaluation systems were the observed shortcomings in ginger clinical trials. Further studies with adequate designs are warranted to validate the reported clinical functions of ginger. MDPI 2020-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7019938/ /pubmed/31935866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12010157 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Anh, Nguyen Hoang Kim, Sun Jo Long, Nguyen Phuoc Min, Jung Eun Yoon, Young Cheol Lee, Eun Goo Kim, Mina Kim, Tae Joon Yang, Yoon Young Son, Eui Young Yoon, Sang Jun Diem, Nguyen Co Kim, Hyung Min Kwon, Sung Won Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | ginger on human health: a comprehensive systematic review of 109 randomized controlled trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31935866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12010157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anhnguyenhoang gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT kimsunjo gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT longnguyenphuoc gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT minjungeun gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT yoonyoungcheol gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT leeeungoo gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT kimmina gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT kimtaejoon gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT yangyoonyoung gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT soneuiyoung gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT yoonsangjun gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT diemnguyenco gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT kimhyungmin gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials AT kwonsungwon gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials |