Cargando…

Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials

Clinical applications of ginger with an expectation of clinical benefits are receiving significant attention. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion in terms of the clinical effects of ginger in all reported areas. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anh, Nguyen Hoang, Kim, Sun Jo, Long, Nguyen Phuoc, Min, Jung Eun, Yoon, Young Cheol, Lee, Eun Goo, Kim, Mina, Kim, Tae Joon, Yang, Yoon Young, Son, Eui Young, Yoon, Sang Jun, Diem, Nguyen Co, Kim, Hyung Min, Kwon, Sung Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31935866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12010157
_version_ 1783497634889072640
author Anh, Nguyen Hoang
Kim, Sun Jo
Long, Nguyen Phuoc
Min, Jung Eun
Yoon, Young Cheol
Lee, Eun Goo
Kim, Mina
Kim, Tae Joon
Yang, Yoon Young
Son, Eui Young
Yoon, Sang Jun
Diem, Nguyen Co
Kim, Hyung Min
Kwon, Sung Won
author_facet Anh, Nguyen Hoang
Kim, Sun Jo
Long, Nguyen Phuoc
Min, Jung Eun
Yoon, Young Cheol
Lee, Eun Goo
Kim, Mina
Kim, Tae Joon
Yang, Yoon Young
Son, Eui Young
Yoon, Sang Jun
Diem, Nguyen Co
Kim, Hyung Min
Kwon, Sung Won
author_sort Anh, Nguyen Hoang
collection PubMed
description Clinical applications of ginger with an expectation of clinical benefits are receiving significant attention. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion in terms of the clinical effects of ginger in all reported areas. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline, randomized controlled trials on the effects of ginger were investigated. Accordingly, 109 eligible papers were fully extracted in terms of study design, population characteristics, evaluation systems, adverse effects, and main outcomes. The reporting quality of the included studies was assessed based on the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials and integrated together with studies that investigated the same subjects. The included studies that examined the improvement of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, inflammation, metabolic syndromes, digestive function, and colorectal cancer’s markers were consistently supported, whereas other expected functions were relatively controversial. Nevertheless, only 43 clinical trials (39.4%) met the criterion of having a ‘high quality of evidence.’ In addition to the quality assessment result, small populations and unstandardized evaluation systems were the observed shortcomings in ginger clinical trials. Further studies with adequate designs are warranted to validate the reported clinical functions of ginger.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7019938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70199382020-03-09 Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials Anh, Nguyen Hoang Kim, Sun Jo Long, Nguyen Phuoc Min, Jung Eun Yoon, Young Cheol Lee, Eun Goo Kim, Mina Kim, Tae Joon Yang, Yoon Young Son, Eui Young Yoon, Sang Jun Diem, Nguyen Co Kim, Hyung Min Kwon, Sung Won Nutrients Review Clinical applications of ginger with an expectation of clinical benefits are receiving significant attention. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion in terms of the clinical effects of ginger in all reported areas. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline, randomized controlled trials on the effects of ginger were investigated. Accordingly, 109 eligible papers were fully extracted in terms of study design, population characteristics, evaluation systems, adverse effects, and main outcomes. The reporting quality of the included studies was assessed based on the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials and integrated together with studies that investigated the same subjects. The included studies that examined the improvement of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, inflammation, metabolic syndromes, digestive function, and colorectal cancer’s markers were consistently supported, whereas other expected functions were relatively controversial. Nevertheless, only 43 clinical trials (39.4%) met the criterion of having a ‘high quality of evidence.’ In addition to the quality assessment result, small populations and unstandardized evaluation systems were the observed shortcomings in ginger clinical trials. Further studies with adequate designs are warranted to validate the reported clinical functions of ginger. MDPI 2020-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7019938/ /pubmed/31935866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12010157 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Anh, Nguyen Hoang
Kim, Sun Jo
Long, Nguyen Phuoc
Min, Jung Eun
Yoon, Young Cheol
Lee, Eun Goo
Kim, Mina
Kim, Tae Joon
Yang, Yoon Young
Son, Eui Young
Yoon, Sang Jun
Diem, Nguyen Co
Kim, Hyung Min
Kwon, Sung Won
Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials
title Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort ginger on human health: a comprehensive systematic review of 109 randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31935866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12010157
work_keys_str_mv AT anhnguyenhoang gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kimsunjo gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT longnguyenphuoc gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT minjungeun gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yoonyoungcheol gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT leeeungoo gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kimmina gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kimtaejoon gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangyoonyoung gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT soneuiyoung gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yoonsangjun gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT diemnguyenco gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kimhyungmin gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kwonsungwon gingeronhumanhealthacomprehensivesystematicreviewof109randomizedcontrolledtrials