Cargando…

Simulation Informed CAD for 3D Nanoprinting

A promising 3D nanoprinting method, used to deposit nanoscale mesh style objects, is prone to non-linear distortions which limits the complexity and variety of deposit geometries. The method, focused electron beam-induced deposition (FEBID), uses a nanoscale electron probe for continuous dissociatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fowlkes, Jason D., Winkler, Robert, Mutunga, Eva, Rack, Philip D., Plank, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi11010008
_version_ 1783497670226083840
author Fowlkes, Jason D.
Winkler, Robert
Mutunga, Eva
Rack, Philip D.
Plank, Harald
author_facet Fowlkes, Jason D.
Winkler, Robert
Mutunga, Eva
Rack, Philip D.
Plank, Harald
author_sort Fowlkes, Jason D.
collection PubMed
description A promising 3D nanoprinting method, used to deposit nanoscale mesh style objects, is prone to non-linear distortions which limits the complexity and variety of deposit geometries. The method, focused electron beam-induced deposition (FEBID), uses a nanoscale electron probe for continuous dissociation of surface adsorbed precursor molecules which drives highly localized deposition. Three dimensional objects are deposited using a 2D digital scanning pattern—the digital beam speed controls deposition into the third, or out-of-plane dimension. Multiple computer-aided design (CAD) programs exist for FEBID mesh object definition but rely on the definition of nodes and interconnecting linear nanowires. Thus, a method is needed to prevent non-linear/bending nanowires for accurate geometric synthesis. An analytical model is derived based on simulation results, calibrated using real experiments, to ensure linear nanowire deposition to compensate for implicit beam heating that takes place during FEBID. The model subsequently compensates and informs the exposure file containing the pixel-by-pixel scanning instructions, ensuring nanowire linearity by appropriately adjusting the patterning beam speeds. The derivation of the model is presented, based on a critical mass balance revealed by simulations and the strategy used to integrate the physics-based analytical model into an existing 3D nanoprinting CAD program is overviewed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7020084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70200842020-03-09 Simulation Informed CAD for 3D Nanoprinting Fowlkes, Jason D. Winkler, Robert Mutunga, Eva Rack, Philip D. Plank, Harald Micromachines (Basel) Communication A promising 3D nanoprinting method, used to deposit nanoscale mesh style objects, is prone to non-linear distortions which limits the complexity and variety of deposit geometries. The method, focused electron beam-induced deposition (FEBID), uses a nanoscale electron probe for continuous dissociation of surface adsorbed precursor molecules which drives highly localized deposition. Three dimensional objects are deposited using a 2D digital scanning pattern—the digital beam speed controls deposition into the third, or out-of-plane dimension. Multiple computer-aided design (CAD) programs exist for FEBID mesh object definition but rely on the definition of nodes and interconnecting linear nanowires. Thus, a method is needed to prevent non-linear/bending nanowires for accurate geometric synthesis. An analytical model is derived based on simulation results, calibrated using real experiments, to ensure linear nanowire deposition to compensate for implicit beam heating that takes place during FEBID. The model subsequently compensates and informs the exposure file containing the pixel-by-pixel scanning instructions, ensuring nanowire linearity by appropriately adjusting the patterning beam speeds. The derivation of the model is presented, based on a critical mass balance revealed by simulations and the strategy used to integrate the physics-based analytical model into an existing 3D nanoprinting CAD program is overviewed. MDPI 2019-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7020084/ /pubmed/31861480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi11010008 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Fowlkes, Jason D.
Winkler, Robert
Mutunga, Eva
Rack, Philip D.
Plank, Harald
Simulation Informed CAD for 3D Nanoprinting
title Simulation Informed CAD for 3D Nanoprinting
title_full Simulation Informed CAD for 3D Nanoprinting
title_fullStr Simulation Informed CAD for 3D Nanoprinting
title_full_unstemmed Simulation Informed CAD for 3D Nanoprinting
title_short Simulation Informed CAD for 3D Nanoprinting
title_sort simulation informed cad for 3d nanoprinting
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi11010008
work_keys_str_mv AT fowlkesjasond simulationinformedcadfor3dnanoprinting
AT winklerrobert simulationinformedcadfor3dnanoprinting
AT mutungaeva simulationinformedcadfor3dnanoprinting
AT rackphilipd simulationinformedcadfor3dnanoprinting
AT plankharald simulationinformedcadfor3dnanoprinting