Cargando…

Should we treat sepsis-induced DIC with anticoagulants?

BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common complication in sepsis because of crosstalk between the immune system and the coagulation system. Several anticoagulant agents have been tested in an attempt to improve the survival of patients with sepsis and sepsis-induced DIC. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Inata, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-0435-8
_version_ 1783497730193096704
author Inata, Yu
author_facet Inata, Yu
author_sort Inata, Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common complication in sepsis because of crosstalk between the immune system and the coagulation system. Several anticoagulant agents have been tested in an attempt to improve the survival of patients with sepsis and sepsis-induced DIC. Here, we discuss the rationale against using anticoagulation therapy in septic DIC. MAIN BODY OF THE ABSTRACT: Coagulopathy and DIC are associated with increased mortality in sepsis. Several anticoagulant agents have been tested in an attempt to improve the survival of patients with sepsis and sepsis-induced DIC, but have proven largely ineffective. This is because of two major factors. First, the coagulation system is complex and closely related to the immune system. When we manipulate one of the factors involved in these systems, we may disturb the delicate homeostasis between them. A second factor may be failure to identify patients who will benefit from anticoagulation therapy. This may be attributed partly to the fact that there is no gold standard for the diagnosis of DIC, and there are consequently several diagnostic criteria, none of which are specifically designed for sepsis-induced DIC. Application of precision medicine, of the kind currently being applied in other intensive care fields, may be the key to overcoming these challenges. Until we know the precise target population, we should not use anticoagulation therapy in sepsis-induced DIC outside a research setting. SHORT CONCLUSION: There is no strong evidence to support the effectiveness of routine anticoagulation therapy in sepsis-induced DIC, and it should not be used clinically until more is known regarding the population of patients who may benefit from it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7020366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70203662020-02-20 Should we treat sepsis-induced DIC with anticoagulants? Inata, Yu J Intensive Care Commentary BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common complication in sepsis because of crosstalk between the immune system and the coagulation system. Several anticoagulant agents have been tested in an attempt to improve the survival of patients with sepsis and sepsis-induced DIC. Here, we discuss the rationale against using anticoagulation therapy in septic DIC. MAIN BODY OF THE ABSTRACT: Coagulopathy and DIC are associated with increased mortality in sepsis. Several anticoagulant agents have been tested in an attempt to improve the survival of patients with sepsis and sepsis-induced DIC, but have proven largely ineffective. This is because of two major factors. First, the coagulation system is complex and closely related to the immune system. When we manipulate one of the factors involved in these systems, we may disturb the delicate homeostasis between them. A second factor may be failure to identify patients who will benefit from anticoagulation therapy. This may be attributed partly to the fact that there is no gold standard for the diagnosis of DIC, and there are consequently several diagnostic criteria, none of which are specifically designed for sepsis-induced DIC. Application of precision medicine, of the kind currently being applied in other intensive care fields, may be the key to overcoming these challenges. Until we know the precise target population, we should not use anticoagulation therapy in sepsis-induced DIC outside a research setting. SHORT CONCLUSION: There is no strong evidence to support the effectiveness of routine anticoagulation therapy in sepsis-induced DIC, and it should not be used clinically until more is known regarding the population of patients who may benefit from it. BioMed Central 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7020366/ /pubmed/32082582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-0435-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Inata, Yu
Should we treat sepsis-induced DIC with anticoagulants?
title Should we treat sepsis-induced DIC with anticoagulants?
title_full Should we treat sepsis-induced DIC with anticoagulants?
title_fullStr Should we treat sepsis-induced DIC with anticoagulants?
title_full_unstemmed Should we treat sepsis-induced DIC with anticoagulants?
title_short Should we treat sepsis-induced DIC with anticoagulants?
title_sort should we treat sepsis-induced dic with anticoagulants?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-0435-8
work_keys_str_mv AT inatayu shouldwetreatsepsisinduceddicwithanticoagulants