Cargando…

Sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator

BACKGROUND: The distribution of prey in the ocean is spatially and temporally patchy. How predators respond to this prey patchiness may have consequences on their foraging success, and thus physical condition. The recent ability to record fine-scale movements of marine animals combined with novel ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lidgard, D. C., Bowen, W. D., Iverson, S. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-0196-y
_version_ 1783497778022842368
author Lidgard, D. C.
Bowen, W. D.
Iverson, S. J.
author_facet Lidgard, D. C.
Bowen, W. D.
Iverson, S. J.
author_sort Lidgard, D. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The distribution of prey in the ocean is spatially and temporally patchy. How predators respond to this prey patchiness may have consequences on their foraging success, and thus physical condition. The recent ability to record fine-scale movements of marine animals combined with novel home-range analyses that incorporate the dimension of time should permit a better understanding of how individuals utilise different regions of space and the consequences on their foraging success. METHODS: Over a six-year study, we used T-LoCoH (Time-Local Convex Hull) home-range software to model archival GPS (Global Positioning System) data from 81 grey seals to investigate the fine-scale spatio-temporal use of space and the distribution of apparent foraging effort. Regions of home-ranges were classified according to the frequency of return visits (site fidelity) and duration of visits (intensity of use). Generalized linear mixed -effects models were used to test hypotheses on seasonal changes in foraging distribution and behaviour and the role of space-use and state on determining foraging success. RESULTS: Male grey seals had larger home-ranges and core areas than females, and both sexes showed a contraction in home-range and core area in fall leading up to the breeding season compared with summer. Heavier individuals had smaller core areas than lighter ones, suggesting access to higher quality habitat might be limited to those individuals with greater foraging experience and competitive ability. The size of the home-range or core area was not an important predictor of the rate of mass gain. A fine-scale spatio-temporal analysis of habitat use within the home-range provided evidence of intra-annual site fidelity at presumed foraging locations, suggesting predictably in prey distribution. Neither sex nor season were useful predictors for classifying behaviour. Rather, individual identity explained much of the variation in fine-scale behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how upper-trophic level marine predators use space provides opportunities to explore the consequences of variation in foraging tactics and their success on fitness. Having knowledge of the drivers that shape this intraspecific variation can contribute toward predicting how these predators may respond to both natural and man-made environmental forcing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7020581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70205812020-02-20 Sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator Lidgard, D. C. Bowen, W. D. Iverson, S. J. Mov Ecol Research BACKGROUND: The distribution of prey in the ocean is spatially and temporally patchy. How predators respond to this prey patchiness may have consequences on their foraging success, and thus physical condition. The recent ability to record fine-scale movements of marine animals combined with novel home-range analyses that incorporate the dimension of time should permit a better understanding of how individuals utilise different regions of space and the consequences on their foraging success. METHODS: Over a six-year study, we used T-LoCoH (Time-Local Convex Hull) home-range software to model archival GPS (Global Positioning System) data from 81 grey seals to investigate the fine-scale spatio-temporal use of space and the distribution of apparent foraging effort. Regions of home-ranges were classified according to the frequency of return visits (site fidelity) and duration of visits (intensity of use). Generalized linear mixed -effects models were used to test hypotheses on seasonal changes in foraging distribution and behaviour and the role of space-use and state on determining foraging success. RESULTS: Male grey seals had larger home-ranges and core areas than females, and both sexes showed a contraction in home-range and core area in fall leading up to the breeding season compared with summer. Heavier individuals had smaller core areas than lighter ones, suggesting access to higher quality habitat might be limited to those individuals with greater foraging experience and competitive ability. The size of the home-range or core area was not an important predictor of the rate of mass gain. A fine-scale spatio-temporal analysis of habitat use within the home-range provided evidence of intra-annual site fidelity at presumed foraging locations, suggesting predictably in prey distribution. Neither sex nor season were useful predictors for classifying behaviour. Rather, individual identity explained much of the variation in fine-scale behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how upper-trophic level marine predators use space provides opportunities to explore the consequences of variation in foraging tactics and their success on fitness. Having knowledge of the drivers that shape this intraspecific variation can contribute toward predicting how these predators may respond to both natural and man-made environmental forcing. BioMed Central 2020-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7020581/ /pubmed/32082578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-0196-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lidgard, D. C.
Bowen, W. D.
Iverson, S. J.
Sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator
title Sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator
title_full Sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator
title_fullStr Sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator
title_full_unstemmed Sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator
title_short Sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator
title_sort sex-differences in fine-scale home-range use in an upper-trophic level marine predator
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-0196-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lidgarddc sexdifferencesinfinescalehomerangeuseinanuppertrophiclevelmarinepredator
AT bowenwd sexdifferencesinfinescalehomerangeuseinanuppertrophiclevelmarinepredator
AT iversonsj sexdifferencesinfinescalehomerangeuseinanuppertrophiclevelmarinepredator