Cargando…

Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to finding alternative ways for centers with nonavailability of ultrasonography or fluoroscopy for nonoperative pneumatic reduction of intussusceptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 cases of intussusceptions were included in the study in-between October 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanger, Ramesh, Singh, Aditya Pratap, Gupta, Arun Kumar, Barolia, Dinesh Kumar, Shukla, Arvind Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32139984
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_129_18
_version_ 1783497789051764736
author Tanger, Ramesh
Singh, Aditya Pratap
Gupta, Arun Kumar
Barolia, Dinesh Kumar
Shukla, Arvind Kumar
author_facet Tanger, Ramesh
Singh, Aditya Pratap
Gupta, Arun Kumar
Barolia, Dinesh Kumar
Shukla, Arvind Kumar
author_sort Tanger, Ramesh
collection PubMed
description AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to finding alternative ways for centers with nonavailability of ultrasonography or fluoroscopy for nonoperative pneumatic reduction of intussusceptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 cases of intussusceptions were included in the study in-between October 2016 and March 2018. We tried stethoscope-guided pneumatic reduction using locally assembled equipment. The intraluminal pressure was monitored and maintained below 100 mmHg. A total of two attempts of 3 min each were allowed. We compared our results with the control group who have been performing laparotomy for every case of intussusception. RESULTS: There were 35 males and 13 females in our study. The average age of the patients was 7.5 months. Intussusceptions were reduced in 38 (80%) patients but could not be reduced in 10 (20%) patients. Majority of the intussusceptions had symptoms of at least 2 days. There were no complications such as perforation in our study. CONCLUSION: Stethoscope-guided pneumatic reduction seems to be a feasible and alternative effective method for the treatment of intussusceptions in children where availability of ultrasonography and skilled radiologist with overburden of work is a great issue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7020676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70206762020-03-06 Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction Tanger, Ramesh Singh, Aditya Pratap Gupta, Arun Kumar Barolia, Dinesh Kumar Shukla, Arvind Kumar J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to finding alternative ways for centers with nonavailability of ultrasonography or fluoroscopy for nonoperative pneumatic reduction of intussusceptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 cases of intussusceptions were included in the study in-between October 2016 and March 2018. We tried stethoscope-guided pneumatic reduction using locally assembled equipment. The intraluminal pressure was monitored and maintained below 100 mmHg. A total of two attempts of 3 min each were allowed. We compared our results with the control group who have been performing laparotomy for every case of intussusception. RESULTS: There were 35 males and 13 females in our study. The average age of the patients was 7.5 months. Intussusceptions were reduced in 38 (80%) patients but could not be reduced in 10 (20%) patients. Majority of the intussusceptions had symptoms of at least 2 days. There were no complications such as perforation in our study. CONCLUSION: Stethoscope-guided pneumatic reduction seems to be a feasible and alternative effective method for the treatment of intussusceptions in children where availability of ultrasonography and skilled radiologist with overburden of work is a great issue. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7020676/ /pubmed/32139984 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_129_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tanger, Ramesh
Singh, Aditya Pratap
Gupta, Arun Kumar
Barolia, Dinesh Kumar
Shukla, Arvind Kumar
Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction
title Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction
title_full Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction
title_fullStr Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction
title_full_unstemmed Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction
title_short Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction
title_sort nonavailability of ultrasound: try stethoscope in pneumatic reduction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32139984
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_129_18
work_keys_str_mv AT tangerramesh nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction
AT singhadityapratap nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction
AT guptaarunkumar nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction
AT baroliadineshkumar nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction
AT shuklaarvindkumar nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction