Cargando…
Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction
AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to finding alternative ways for centers with nonavailability of ultrasonography or fluoroscopy for nonoperative pneumatic reduction of intussusceptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 cases of intussusceptions were included in the study in-between October 20...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32139984 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_129_18 |
_version_ | 1783497789051764736 |
---|---|
author | Tanger, Ramesh Singh, Aditya Pratap Gupta, Arun Kumar Barolia, Dinesh Kumar Shukla, Arvind Kumar |
author_facet | Tanger, Ramesh Singh, Aditya Pratap Gupta, Arun Kumar Barolia, Dinesh Kumar Shukla, Arvind Kumar |
author_sort | Tanger, Ramesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to finding alternative ways for centers with nonavailability of ultrasonography or fluoroscopy for nonoperative pneumatic reduction of intussusceptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 cases of intussusceptions were included in the study in-between October 2016 and March 2018. We tried stethoscope-guided pneumatic reduction using locally assembled equipment. The intraluminal pressure was monitored and maintained below 100 mmHg. A total of two attempts of 3 min each were allowed. We compared our results with the control group who have been performing laparotomy for every case of intussusception. RESULTS: There were 35 males and 13 females in our study. The average age of the patients was 7.5 months. Intussusceptions were reduced in 38 (80%) patients but could not be reduced in 10 (20%) patients. Majority of the intussusceptions had symptoms of at least 2 days. There were no complications such as perforation in our study. CONCLUSION: Stethoscope-guided pneumatic reduction seems to be a feasible and alternative effective method for the treatment of intussusceptions in children where availability of ultrasonography and skilled radiologist with overburden of work is a great issue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7020676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70206762020-03-06 Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction Tanger, Ramesh Singh, Aditya Pratap Gupta, Arun Kumar Barolia, Dinesh Kumar Shukla, Arvind Kumar J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to finding alternative ways for centers with nonavailability of ultrasonography or fluoroscopy for nonoperative pneumatic reduction of intussusceptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 cases of intussusceptions were included in the study in-between October 2016 and March 2018. We tried stethoscope-guided pneumatic reduction using locally assembled equipment. The intraluminal pressure was monitored and maintained below 100 mmHg. A total of two attempts of 3 min each were allowed. We compared our results with the control group who have been performing laparotomy for every case of intussusception. RESULTS: There were 35 males and 13 females in our study. The average age of the patients was 7.5 months. Intussusceptions were reduced in 38 (80%) patients but could not be reduced in 10 (20%) patients. Majority of the intussusceptions had symptoms of at least 2 days. There were no complications such as perforation in our study. CONCLUSION: Stethoscope-guided pneumatic reduction seems to be a feasible and alternative effective method for the treatment of intussusceptions in children where availability of ultrasonography and skilled radiologist with overburden of work is a great issue. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7020676/ /pubmed/32139984 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_129_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tanger, Ramesh Singh, Aditya Pratap Gupta, Arun Kumar Barolia, Dinesh Kumar Shukla, Arvind Kumar Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction |
title | Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction |
title_full | Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction |
title_fullStr | Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction |
title_short | Nonavailability of Ultrasound: Try Stethoscope in Pneumatic Reduction |
title_sort | nonavailability of ultrasound: try stethoscope in pneumatic reduction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32139984 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_129_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangerramesh nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction AT singhadityapratap nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction AT guptaarunkumar nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction AT baroliadineshkumar nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction AT shuklaarvindkumar nonavailabilityofultrasoundtrystethoscopeinpneumaticreduction |