Cargando…
One-Year Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Device Intervention in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: Sub-Analysis of the LIBERTY 360 Study
BACKGROUND: High-risk patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (PAD), including critical limb ischemia (CLI), are often excluded from peripheral endovascular device intervention clinical trials, leading to difficulty in translating trial results into real-world practice. There is a need for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103970 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S230934 |
_version_ | 1783497837625999360 |
---|---|
author | Mustapha, Jihad A Igyarto, Zsuzsanna O’Connor, David Armstrong, Ehrin J Iorio, Anthony R Driver, Vickie R Saab, Fadi Behrens, Ann N Martinsen, Brad J Adams, George L |
author_facet | Mustapha, Jihad A Igyarto, Zsuzsanna O’Connor, David Armstrong, Ehrin J Iorio, Anthony R Driver, Vickie R Saab, Fadi Behrens, Ann N Martinsen, Brad J Adams, George L |
author_sort | Mustapha, Jihad A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High-risk patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (PAD), including critical limb ischemia (CLI), are often excluded from peripheral endovascular device intervention clinical trials, leading to difficulty in translating trial results into real-world practice. There is a need for prospectively assessed studies to evaluate peripheral endovascular device intervention outcomes in CLI patients. METHODS: LIBERTY 360 is a prospective, observational, multi-center study designed to evaluate the procedural and long-term clinical outcomes of peripheral endovascular device intervention in real-world patients with symptomatic lower-extremity PAD. One thousand two hundred and four patients were enrolled and stratified based on Rutherford Classification (RC): RC2-3 (N=501), RC4-5 (N=603), and RC6 (N=100). For this sub-analysis, RC5 and RC6 patients (RC5-6; N=404) were pooled and 1-year outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Procedural complications rarely (1.7%) resulted in post-procedural hospitalization and 89.1% of RC5-6 patients were discharged to home. Considering the advanced disease state in RC5-6 patients, there was a high freedom from 1-year major adverse event rate of 65.5% (defined as target vessel revascularization, death to 30 days, and major target limb amputation). At 1 year, freedom from major amputation was 89.6%. Wounds identified at baseline on the target limb had completely healed in 172/243 (70.8%) of the RC5-6 subjects by 1 year. Additionally, the overall quality of life, as measured by VascuQoL, improved from baseline to 1 year. CONCLUSION: LIBERTY investigated real-world PAD patients with independent oversight of outcomes. This analysis of LIBERTY RC5-6 patients demonstrates that peripheral endovascular device intervention can be successful in CLI patients, with low rates of major amputation and improvement in wound healing and quality of life through 1-year follow-up. LIBERTY 360, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01855412, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01855412. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7020930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70209302020-02-26 One-Year Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Device Intervention in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: Sub-Analysis of the LIBERTY 360 Study Mustapha, Jihad A Igyarto, Zsuzsanna O’Connor, David Armstrong, Ehrin J Iorio, Anthony R Driver, Vickie R Saab, Fadi Behrens, Ann N Martinsen, Brad J Adams, George L Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research BACKGROUND: High-risk patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (PAD), including critical limb ischemia (CLI), are often excluded from peripheral endovascular device intervention clinical trials, leading to difficulty in translating trial results into real-world practice. There is a need for prospectively assessed studies to evaluate peripheral endovascular device intervention outcomes in CLI patients. METHODS: LIBERTY 360 is a prospective, observational, multi-center study designed to evaluate the procedural and long-term clinical outcomes of peripheral endovascular device intervention in real-world patients with symptomatic lower-extremity PAD. One thousand two hundred and four patients were enrolled and stratified based on Rutherford Classification (RC): RC2-3 (N=501), RC4-5 (N=603), and RC6 (N=100). For this sub-analysis, RC5 and RC6 patients (RC5-6; N=404) were pooled and 1-year outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Procedural complications rarely (1.7%) resulted in post-procedural hospitalization and 89.1% of RC5-6 patients were discharged to home. Considering the advanced disease state in RC5-6 patients, there was a high freedom from 1-year major adverse event rate of 65.5% (defined as target vessel revascularization, death to 30 days, and major target limb amputation). At 1 year, freedom from major amputation was 89.6%. Wounds identified at baseline on the target limb had completely healed in 172/243 (70.8%) of the RC5-6 subjects by 1 year. Additionally, the overall quality of life, as measured by VascuQoL, improved from baseline to 1 year. CONCLUSION: LIBERTY investigated real-world PAD patients with independent oversight of outcomes. This analysis of LIBERTY RC5-6 patients demonstrates that peripheral endovascular device intervention can be successful in CLI patients, with low rates of major amputation and improvement in wound healing and quality of life through 1-year follow-up. LIBERTY 360, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01855412, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01855412. Dove 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7020930/ /pubmed/32103970 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S230934 Text en © 2020 Mustapha et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mustapha, Jihad A Igyarto, Zsuzsanna O’Connor, David Armstrong, Ehrin J Iorio, Anthony R Driver, Vickie R Saab, Fadi Behrens, Ann N Martinsen, Brad J Adams, George L One-Year Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Device Intervention in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: Sub-Analysis of the LIBERTY 360 Study |
title | One-Year Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Device Intervention in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: Sub-Analysis of the LIBERTY 360 Study |
title_full | One-Year Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Device Intervention in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: Sub-Analysis of the LIBERTY 360 Study |
title_fullStr | One-Year Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Device Intervention in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: Sub-Analysis of the LIBERTY 360 Study |
title_full_unstemmed | One-Year Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Device Intervention in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: Sub-Analysis of the LIBERTY 360 Study |
title_short | One-Year Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Device Intervention in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: Sub-Analysis of the LIBERTY 360 Study |
title_sort | one-year outcomes of peripheral endovascular device intervention in critical limb ischemia patients: sub-analysis of the liberty 360 study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103970 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S230934 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mustaphajihada oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study AT igyartozsuzsanna oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study AT oconnordavid oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study AT armstrongehrinj oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study AT iorioanthonyr oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study AT drivervickier oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study AT saabfadi oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study AT behrensannn oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study AT martinsenbradj oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study AT adamsgeorgel oneyearoutcomesofperipheralendovasculardeviceinterventionincriticallimbischemiapatientssubanalysisoftheliberty360study |