Cargando…

Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres (CSM-TACE) and conventional TACE (cTACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-five HCC patients rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Bin, Xiang, Hua, Ma, Cong, Xiong, Bin, Ma, Yilong, Zhao, Chang, Yao, Yuanhui, Zhang, Zishu, Chen, Changyong, Li, Haiping, Long, Qingyun, Zhou, Jun, Luo, Chao, Qiu, Huaiming, Hu, Hongyao, Zhao, Hui, Zhou, Guofeng, Zheng, Chuansheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104076
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S187203
_version_ 1783497838799355904
author Liang, Bin
Xiang, Hua
Ma, Cong
Xiong, Bin
Ma, Yilong
Zhao, Chang
Yao, Yuanhui
Zhang, Zishu
Chen, Changyong
Li, Haiping
Long, Qingyun
Zhou, Jun
Luo, Chao
Qiu, Huaiming
Hu, Hongyao
Zhao, Hui
Zhou, Guofeng
Zheng, Chuansheng
author_facet Liang, Bin
Xiang, Hua
Ma, Cong
Xiong, Bin
Ma, Yilong
Zhao, Chang
Yao, Yuanhui
Zhang, Zishu
Chen, Changyong
Li, Haiping
Long, Qingyun
Zhou, Jun
Luo, Chao
Qiu, Huaiming
Hu, Hongyao
Zhao, Hui
Zhou, Guofeng
Zheng, Chuansheng
author_sort Liang, Bin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres (CSM-TACE) and conventional TACE (cTACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-five HCC patients receiving CSM-TACE or cTACE were consecutively enrolled in this multi-center, retrospective cohort study, and then divided into CSM-TACE group and cTACE group accordingly. Complete response (CR), objective response (ORR) and disease control response (DCR) was assessed according to mRECIST criteria at 1 month (M1), 3 months(M3) and 6 months(M6) after treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Liver function indexes and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. RESULTS: CR at M3 (P=0.020) and ORR at M1 (P<0.001), M3 (P<0.001) and M6 (P=0.017) after treatment were significantly higher in the CSM-TACE compared with cTACE group. DCRs, PFS (25.3 months vs 24.2 months, P=0.503) and OS (27.8 months vs 25.3 months, P=0.203) were similar between the two groups. CSM-TACE was independently correlated with higher ORR at M1 (P=0.002) and longer OS (P=0.023). Abnormal alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (P=0.049) was independently associated with lower ORR at M3, and history of alcohol intake (P=0.019) and largest nodule size ≥7 cm (P=0.015) independently correlated with lower ORR at M6 (P=0.015). Largest nodule size ≥7 cm (P=0.029) and abnormal albumin (ALB) (P=0.046) were independently associated with shorter PFS. Child-Pugh stage B/C (P=0.023), abnormal ALB (P=0.001), ALP (P=0.008) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (P=0.005) were independently associated with shorter OS. Most liver function indexes and AEs were similar between the two groups (P>0.05), except that ALP (P=0.005), total bilirubin (P=0.031), pain during procedure (P=0.034) and occurrence of fever post(treatment (P=0.017) were significantly elevated in the CSM-TACE compared with cTACE group. CONCLUSION: CSM-TACE presents with a better treatment response and similar survival profile compared with cTACE in HCC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7020935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70209352020-02-26 Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study Liang, Bin Xiang, Hua Ma, Cong Xiong, Bin Ma, Yilong Zhao, Chang Yao, Yuanhui Zhang, Zishu Chen, Changyong Li, Haiping Long, Qingyun Zhou, Jun Luo, Chao Qiu, Huaiming Hu, Hongyao Zhao, Hui Zhou, Guofeng Zheng, Chuansheng Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres (CSM-TACE) and conventional TACE (cTACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-five HCC patients receiving CSM-TACE or cTACE were consecutively enrolled in this multi-center, retrospective cohort study, and then divided into CSM-TACE group and cTACE group accordingly. Complete response (CR), objective response (ORR) and disease control response (DCR) was assessed according to mRECIST criteria at 1 month (M1), 3 months(M3) and 6 months(M6) after treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Liver function indexes and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. RESULTS: CR at M3 (P=0.020) and ORR at M1 (P<0.001), M3 (P<0.001) and M6 (P=0.017) after treatment were significantly higher in the CSM-TACE compared with cTACE group. DCRs, PFS (25.3 months vs 24.2 months, P=0.503) and OS (27.8 months vs 25.3 months, P=0.203) were similar between the two groups. CSM-TACE was independently correlated with higher ORR at M1 (P=0.002) and longer OS (P=0.023). Abnormal alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (P=0.049) was independently associated with lower ORR at M3, and history of alcohol intake (P=0.019) and largest nodule size ≥7 cm (P=0.015) independently correlated with lower ORR at M6 (P=0.015). Largest nodule size ≥7 cm (P=0.029) and abnormal albumin (ALB) (P=0.046) were independently associated with shorter PFS. Child-Pugh stage B/C (P=0.023), abnormal ALB (P=0.001), ALP (P=0.008) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (P=0.005) were independently associated with shorter OS. Most liver function indexes and AEs were similar between the two groups (P>0.05), except that ALP (P=0.005), total bilirubin (P=0.031), pain during procedure (P=0.034) and occurrence of fever post(treatment (P=0.017) were significantly elevated in the CSM-TACE compared with cTACE group. CONCLUSION: CSM-TACE presents with a better treatment response and similar survival profile compared with cTACE in HCC patients. Dove 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7020935/ /pubmed/32104076 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S187203 Text en © 2020 Liang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Liang, Bin
Xiang, Hua
Ma, Cong
Xiong, Bin
Ma, Yilong
Zhao, Chang
Yao, Yuanhui
Zhang, Zishu
Chen, Changyong
Li, Haiping
Long, Qingyun
Zhou, Jun
Luo, Chao
Qiu, Huaiming
Hu, Hongyao
Zhao, Hui
Zhou, Guofeng
Zheng, Chuansheng
Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study
title Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study
title_full Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study
title_short Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres(®) microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study
title_sort comparison of chemoembolization with callispheres(®) microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104076
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S187203
work_keys_str_mv AT liangbin comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT xianghua comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT macong comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT xiongbin comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT mayilong comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhaochang comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT yaoyuanhui comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhangzishu comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT chenchangyong comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT lihaiping comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT longqingyun comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhoujun comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT luochao comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT qiuhuaiming comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT huhongyao comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhaohui comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhouguofeng comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhengchuansheng comparisonofchemoembolizationwithcallispheresmicrospheresandconventionalchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaamulticenterretrospectivestudy