Cargando…
Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method
PURPOSE: This technical note presents an inexpensive tool and method for determining lead equivalency using digital radiography x‐ray equipment. METHODS: A test tool was developed using commercially available lead tape (3M™ Lead Foil Tape 421). The test tool consisted of nine varying lead thick squa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31916401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12810 |
_version_ | 1783497847979638784 |
---|---|
author | Wargo, Richard Ryan Aljabal, Areej Fawzi Lin, Pei‐Jan Paul |
author_facet | Wargo, Richard Ryan Aljabal, Areej Fawzi Lin, Pei‐Jan Paul |
author_sort | Wargo, Richard Ryan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This technical note presents an inexpensive tool and method for determining lead equivalency using digital radiography x‐ray equipment. METHODS: A test tool was developed using commercially available lead tape (3M™ Lead Foil Tape 421). The test tool consisted of nine varying lead thick squares arranged in a larger square (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 mm). It was imaged on a DR plate with a digital portable x‐ray unit across a range of energies (60–120 kVp) and two beam filtrations. Lead equivalency was determined by using the linear relationship between dose to the detector and pixel values in the raw images. The lead equivalency of the tape was validated using known lead thicknesses (physically measured with caliper). Additional lead equivalency measurements were made for protective eyewear, a thyroid shield, and a lead apron. RESULTS: The test tool and method measured the two known lead thicknesses to be –9.7% to 7.1% different from the actual values across the range of energies under normal x‐ray beam conditions and under a 1‐mm copper filtered x‐ray beam. The additional lead equivalency measurements of radiation protection apparel across energies ranged from –6% to 20% for both beam conditions when compared with the values provided by the manufacturer. CONCLUSION: This work validates the test tool and methodology as an inexpensive alternative to checking the lead equivalency of radiation protection apparel in a clinical setting. The methodology is equipment independent with a few prerequisites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7020982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70209822020-03-06 Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method Wargo, Richard Ryan Aljabal, Areej Fawzi Lin, Pei‐Jan Paul J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Note PURPOSE: This technical note presents an inexpensive tool and method for determining lead equivalency using digital radiography x‐ray equipment. METHODS: A test tool was developed using commercially available lead tape (3M™ Lead Foil Tape 421). The test tool consisted of nine varying lead thick squares arranged in a larger square (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 mm). It was imaged on a DR plate with a digital portable x‐ray unit across a range of energies (60–120 kVp) and two beam filtrations. Lead equivalency was determined by using the linear relationship between dose to the detector and pixel values in the raw images. The lead equivalency of the tape was validated using known lead thicknesses (physically measured with caliper). Additional lead equivalency measurements were made for protective eyewear, a thyroid shield, and a lead apron. RESULTS: The test tool and method measured the two known lead thicknesses to be –9.7% to 7.1% different from the actual values across the range of energies under normal x‐ray beam conditions and under a 1‐mm copper filtered x‐ray beam. The additional lead equivalency measurements of radiation protection apparel across energies ranged from –6% to 20% for both beam conditions when compared with the values provided by the manufacturer. CONCLUSION: This work validates the test tool and methodology as an inexpensive alternative to checking the lead equivalency of radiation protection apparel in a clinical setting. The methodology is equipment independent with a few prerequisites. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7020982/ /pubmed/31916401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12810 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Wargo, Richard Ryan Aljabal, Areej Fawzi Lin, Pei‐Jan Paul Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method |
title | Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method |
title_full | Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method |
title_fullStr | Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method |
title_short | Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method |
title_sort | evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31916401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wargorichardryan evaluationandverificationofasimplifiedleadequivalencymeasurementmethod AT aljabalareejfawzi evaluationandverificationofasimplifiedleadequivalencymeasurementmethod AT linpeijanpaul evaluationandverificationofasimplifiedleadequivalencymeasurementmethod |