Cargando…

Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method

PURPOSE: This technical note presents an inexpensive tool and method for determining lead equivalency using digital radiography x‐ray equipment. METHODS: A test tool was developed using commercially available lead tape (3M™ Lead Foil Tape 421). The test tool consisted of nine varying lead thick squa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wargo, Richard Ryan, Aljabal, Areej Fawzi, Lin, Pei‐Jan Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31916401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12810
_version_ 1783497847979638784
author Wargo, Richard Ryan
Aljabal, Areej Fawzi
Lin, Pei‐Jan Paul
author_facet Wargo, Richard Ryan
Aljabal, Areej Fawzi
Lin, Pei‐Jan Paul
author_sort Wargo, Richard Ryan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This technical note presents an inexpensive tool and method for determining lead equivalency using digital radiography x‐ray equipment. METHODS: A test tool was developed using commercially available lead tape (3M™ Lead Foil Tape 421). The test tool consisted of nine varying lead thick squares arranged in a larger square (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 mm). It was imaged on a DR plate with a digital portable x‐ray unit across a range of energies (60–120 kVp) and two beam filtrations. Lead equivalency was determined by using the linear relationship between dose to the detector and pixel values in the raw images. The lead equivalency of the tape was validated using known lead thicknesses (physically measured with caliper). Additional lead equivalency measurements were made for protective eyewear, a thyroid shield, and a lead apron. RESULTS: The test tool and method measured the two known lead thicknesses to be –9.7% to 7.1% different from the actual values across the range of energies under normal x‐ray beam conditions and under a 1‐mm copper filtered x‐ray beam. The additional lead equivalency measurements of radiation protection apparel across energies ranged from –6% to 20% for both beam conditions when compared with the values provided by the manufacturer. CONCLUSION: This work validates the test tool and methodology as an inexpensive alternative to checking the lead equivalency of radiation protection apparel in a clinical setting. The methodology is equipment independent with a few prerequisites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7020982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70209822020-03-06 Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method Wargo, Richard Ryan Aljabal, Areej Fawzi Lin, Pei‐Jan Paul J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Note PURPOSE: This technical note presents an inexpensive tool and method for determining lead equivalency using digital radiography x‐ray equipment. METHODS: A test tool was developed using commercially available lead tape (3M™ Lead Foil Tape 421). The test tool consisted of nine varying lead thick squares arranged in a larger square (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 mm). It was imaged on a DR plate with a digital portable x‐ray unit across a range of energies (60–120 kVp) and two beam filtrations. Lead equivalency was determined by using the linear relationship between dose to the detector and pixel values in the raw images. The lead equivalency of the tape was validated using known lead thicknesses (physically measured with caliper). Additional lead equivalency measurements were made for protective eyewear, a thyroid shield, and a lead apron. RESULTS: The test tool and method measured the two known lead thicknesses to be –9.7% to 7.1% different from the actual values across the range of energies under normal x‐ray beam conditions and under a 1‐mm copper filtered x‐ray beam. The additional lead equivalency measurements of radiation protection apparel across energies ranged from –6% to 20% for both beam conditions when compared with the values provided by the manufacturer. CONCLUSION: This work validates the test tool and methodology as an inexpensive alternative to checking the lead equivalency of radiation protection apparel in a clinical setting. The methodology is equipment independent with a few prerequisites. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7020982/ /pubmed/31916401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12810 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Wargo, Richard Ryan
Aljabal, Areej Fawzi
Lin, Pei‐Jan Paul
Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method
title Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method
title_full Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method
title_fullStr Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method
title_short Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method
title_sort evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31916401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12810
work_keys_str_mv AT wargorichardryan evaluationandverificationofasimplifiedleadequivalencymeasurementmethod
AT aljabalareejfawzi evaluationandverificationofasimplifiedleadequivalencymeasurementmethod
AT linpeijanpaul evaluationandverificationofasimplifiedleadequivalencymeasurementmethod