Cargando…
A pitfall of using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images
The circular‐edge technique using a low‐contrast cylindrical object is commonly used to measure the modulation transfer functions (MTFs) in computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. This method generally entails averaging multiple images of the cyli...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31957969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12821 |
_version_ | 1783497849126780928 |
---|---|
author | Narita, Akihiro Ohkubo, Masaki |
author_facet | Narita, Akihiro Ohkubo, Masaki |
author_sort | Narita, Akihiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The circular‐edge technique using a low‐contrast cylindrical object is commonly used to measure the modulation transfer functions (MTFs) in computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. This method generally entails averaging multiple images of the cylinder to reduce the image noise. We suspected that the cylinder edge shape depicted in the IR images might exhibit slight deformation with respect to the true shape because of the intrinsic nonlinearity of IR algorithms. Image averaging can reduce the image noise, but does not effectively improve the deformation of the edge shape; thereby causing errors in the MTF measurements. We address this issue and propose a method to correct the MTF. We scanned a phantom including cylindrical objects with a CT scanner (Ingenuity Elite, Philips Healthcare). We obtained cylinder images with iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithms. The images suggested that the depicted edge shape deforms and fluctuates depending on slice positions. Because of this deformation, image averaging can potentially cause additional blurring. We define the deformation function D that describes the additional blurring, and obtain D by analyzing multiple images. The MTF measured by the circular‐edge method (referred to as MTF') can be thought of as the multiplication of the true MTF by the Fourier transformation (FT) of D. We thus obtain the corrected MTF (MTF(corrected)) by dividing MTF' by the FT of D. We validate our correction method by comparing the calculated images based on the convolution theorem using MTF' and MTF(corrected) with the actual images obtained with the scanner. The calculated image using MTF(corrected) is more similar to the actual image compared with the image calculated using MTF', particularly in edge regions. We describe a pitfall in MTF measurement using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging, and suggest a method to correct it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7020989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70209892020-03-06 A pitfall of using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images Narita, Akihiro Ohkubo, Masaki J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging The circular‐edge technique using a low‐contrast cylindrical object is commonly used to measure the modulation transfer functions (MTFs) in computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. This method generally entails averaging multiple images of the cylinder to reduce the image noise. We suspected that the cylinder edge shape depicted in the IR images might exhibit slight deformation with respect to the true shape because of the intrinsic nonlinearity of IR algorithms. Image averaging can reduce the image noise, but does not effectively improve the deformation of the edge shape; thereby causing errors in the MTF measurements. We address this issue and propose a method to correct the MTF. We scanned a phantom including cylindrical objects with a CT scanner (Ingenuity Elite, Philips Healthcare). We obtained cylinder images with iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithms. The images suggested that the depicted edge shape deforms and fluctuates depending on slice positions. Because of this deformation, image averaging can potentially cause additional blurring. We define the deformation function D that describes the additional blurring, and obtain D by analyzing multiple images. The MTF measured by the circular‐edge method (referred to as MTF') can be thought of as the multiplication of the true MTF by the Fourier transformation (FT) of D. We thus obtain the corrected MTF (MTF(corrected)) by dividing MTF' by the FT of D. We validate our correction method by comparing the calculated images based on the convolution theorem using MTF' and MTF(corrected) with the actual images obtained with the scanner. The calculated image using MTF(corrected) is more similar to the actual image compared with the image calculated using MTF', particularly in edge regions. We describe a pitfall in MTF measurement using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging, and suggest a method to correct it. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7020989/ /pubmed/31957969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12821 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Narita, Akihiro Ohkubo, Masaki A pitfall of using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images |
title | A pitfall of using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images |
title_full | A pitfall of using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images |
title_fullStr | A pitfall of using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images |
title_full_unstemmed | A pitfall of using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images |
title_short | A pitfall of using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images |
title_sort | pitfall of using the circular‐edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed ct images |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31957969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naritaakihiro apitfallofusingthecircularedgetechniquewithimageaveragingforspatialresolutionmeasurementiniterativelyreconstructedctimages AT ohkubomasaki apitfallofusingthecircularedgetechniquewithimageaveragingforspatialresolutionmeasurementiniterativelyreconstructedctimages AT naritaakihiro pitfallofusingthecircularedgetechniquewithimageaveragingforspatialresolutionmeasurementiniterativelyreconstructedctimages AT ohkubomasaki pitfallofusingthecircularedgetechniquewithimageaveragingforspatialresolutionmeasurementiniterativelyreconstructedctimages |