Cargando…

Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification

Biplane radiography and associated shape-matching provides non-invasive, dynamic, 3D osteo- and arthrokinematic analysis. Due to the complexity of data acquisition, each system should be validated for the anatomy of interest. The purpose of this study was to assess our system’s acquisition methods a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kage, Craig C., Akbari-Shandiz, Mohsen, Foltz, Mary H., Lawrence, Rebekah L., Brandon, Taycia L., Helwig, Nathaniel E., Ellingson, Arin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7021291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228594
_version_ 1783497871569453056
author Kage, Craig C.
Akbari-Shandiz, Mohsen
Foltz, Mary H.
Lawrence, Rebekah L.
Brandon, Taycia L.
Helwig, Nathaniel E.
Ellingson, Arin M.
author_facet Kage, Craig C.
Akbari-Shandiz, Mohsen
Foltz, Mary H.
Lawrence, Rebekah L.
Brandon, Taycia L.
Helwig, Nathaniel E.
Ellingson, Arin M.
author_sort Kage, Craig C.
collection PubMed
description Biplane radiography and associated shape-matching provides non-invasive, dynamic, 3D osteo- and arthrokinematic analysis. Due to the complexity of data acquisition, each system should be validated for the anatomy of interest. The purpose of this study was to assess our system’s acquisition methods and validate a custom, automated 2D/3D shape-matching algorithm relative to radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for the cervical and lumbar spine. Additionally, two sources of RSA error were examined via a Monte Carlo simulation: 1) static bead centroid identification and 2) dynamic bead tracking error. Tantalum beads were implanted into a cadaver for RSA and cervical and lumbar spine flexion and lateral bending were passively simulated. A bead centroid identification reliability analysis was performed and a vertebral validation block was used to determine bead tracking accuracy. Our system’s overall root mean square error (RMSE) for the cervical spine ranged between 0.21–0.49mm and 0.42–1.80° and the lumbar spine ranged between 0.35–1.17mm and 0.49–1.06°. The RMSE associated with RSA ranged between 0.14–0.69mm and 0.96–2.33° for bead centroid identification and 0.25–1.19mm and 1.69–4.06° for dynamic bead tracking. The results of this study demonstrate our system’s ability to accurately quantify segmental spine motion. Additionally, RSA errors should be considered when interpreting biplane validation results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7021291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70212912020-02-26 Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification Kage, Craig C. Akbari-Shandiz, Mohsen Foltz, Mary H. Lawrence, Rebekah L. Brandon, Taycia L. Helwig, Nathaniel E. Ellingson, Arin M. PLoS One Research Article Biplane radiography and associated shape-matching provides non-invasive, dynamic, 3D osteo- and arthrokinematic analysis. Due to the complexity of data acquisition, each system should be validated for the anatomy of interest. The purpose of this study was to assess our system’s acquisition methods and validate a custom, automated 2D/3D shape-matching algorithm relative to radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for the cervical and lumbar spine. Additionally, two sources of RSA error were examined via a Monte Carlo simulation: 1) static bead centroid identification and 2) dynamic bead tracking error. Tantalum beads were implanted into a cadaver for RSA and cervical and lumbar spine flexion and lateral bending were passively simulated. A bead centroid identification reliability analysis was performed and a vertebral validation block was used to determine bead tracking accuracy. Our system’s overall root mean square error (RMSE) for the cervical spine ranged between 0.21–0.49mm and 0.42–1.80° and the lumbar spine ranged between 0.35–1.17mm and 0.49–1.06°. The RMSE associated with RSA ranged between 0.14–0.69mm and 0.96–2.33° for bead centroid identification and 0.25–1.19mm and 1.69–4.06° for dynamic bead tracking. The results of this study demonstrate our system’s ability to accurately quantify segmental spine motion. Additionally, RSA errors should be considered when interpreting biplane validation results. Public Library of Science 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7021291/ /pubmed/32059007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228594 Text en © 2020 Kage et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kage, Craig C.
Akbari-Shandiz, Mohsen
Foltz, Mary H.
Lawrence, Rebekah L.
Brandon, Taycia L.
Helwig, Nathaniel E.
Ellingson, Arin M.
Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification
title Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification
title_full Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification
title_fullStr Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification
title_short Validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification
title_sort validation of an automated shape-matching algorithm for biplane radiographic spine osteokinematics and radiostereometric analysis error quantification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7021291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228594
work_keys_str_mv AT kagecraigc validationofanautomatedshapematchingalgorithmforbiplaneradiographicspineosteokinematicsandradiostereometricanalysiserrorquantification
AT akbarishandizmohsen validationofanautomatedshapematchingalgorithmforbiplaneradiographicspineosteokinematicsandradiostereometricanalysiserrorquantification
AT foltzmaryh validationofanautomatedshapematchingalgorithmforbiplaneradiographicspineosteokinematicsandradiostereometricanalysiserrorquantification
AT lawrencerebekahl validationofanautomatedshapematchingalgorithmforbiplaneradiographicspineosteokinematicsandradiostereometricanalysiserrorquantification
AT brandontaycial validationofanautomatedshapematchingalgorithmforbiplaneradiographicspineosteokinematicsandradiostereometricanalysiserrorquantification
AT helwignathaniele validationofanautomatedshapematchingalgorithmforbiplaneradiographicspineosteokinematicsandradiostereometricanalysiserrorquantification
AT ellingsonarinm validationofanautomatedshapematchingalgorithmforbiplaneradiographicspineosteokinematicsandradiostereometricanalysiserrorquantification